Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gandhis acts of civil disobedience
Gandhis acts of civil disobedience
Gandhis acts of civil disobedience
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gandhis acts of civil disobedience
Gandhis acts of civil disobedience
Gandhis acts of civil disobedience
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
When India was in depression, the British East India company heavily taxed salt. Many civilians were not able to afford a necessity in cooking. In order to stand up for these monopolies, Mohandas Gandhi started the salt march. According to “Gandhi and the Salt March”, “Gandhi began a march from his communal village in western India to the coast to gather salt for free.” This explains how Gandhi stood up against the monopolies with his followers by walking through these marshes and boiling the water gained in order to produce salt which was illegal at the time.
This method worked because it peacefully angered oppressors, allowed people of all races and ethnicities to participate, and involved leaders persuaded people to make sacrifices for the greater good. One of the reasons peaceful protesting worked so well was that it irritated enemies of the cause without the use of violence. Boycotts and sanctions were one effective method of angering the oppressive governments. Gandhi staged a hartel in India and Martin Luther King Jr. helped start the Montgomery Bus Boycott in America (Doc A and B).
"If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so. "-Socrates. Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society because the society is not free unless it's able to check the government. As long as the protest of the law remains peaceful it is a good thing. It is the public telling the government that they will not let them gain to much power and crush their human rights.
Initiating a violent protest will alert their communities of the issue but in a negative way. While a peaceful protest is more likely to positively bring awareness to the issue and spark change. Standing alone can be hard because it means going against social proof. People who stand alone on certain issues and beliefs notify their communities to the existence of a
Most peaceful protests get media coverage and evoke emotions and support within the public, therefore forcing the public to deal
Another example of a protest would be the Black Lives Matters movement that has been going on recently. People from the movement have been blocking freeways and even coming to protest at the Minnesota State Fair and disturbing the peace of everybody there and causing them to have much more security. I am not against what they are standing up for in the slightest bit, I am more just against the fact that they are out blocking major roads and intersections and are showing up protesting at a family function like the state fair. Not all of the friendly protests are so bad but I think that if they are putting other people at risk or in danger no matter it be physical, or mental danger or even just losing their jobs that they have, that, in my opinion, would definitely create a more negative impact on
If slaves never disobeyed the former laws defending slavery, there would still be slavery in America. As a human being, one disobeys purposely to make an impact on certain issues or events that society disagrees on and that is how progress is made. Disobedience is indeed a valuable trait that promotes social progress. In order to change or make an impact there has to be some form of disobedience.
Although peaceful resistance against laws created by the government has been recently used more frequently to express political dissent towards a government and is done entirely by civilians of their nation, it has been effective over the decades as political figures such as Martin Luther King Junior has proved. Peaceful resistance has proven effective only when there has been a truly repressive control on those protesting against their government. This truly repressive control must be something worth fighting for in order to make a reform that would improve society. For example, when women fought for their right to be included in suffrage, they succeeded and did so because their belief of the government’s restriction on them was truly something
If people know their cause, and rally about it peacefully, then great reform will happen. Violence and Law breaking, is not an acceptable form of civil disobedience, it does not solve any problems, in fact it causes new ones to arise. Gandhi knew this:"No country has ever become, or will ever become, happy through victory in war. A nation does not rise that way;"("On Civil Disobedience" by Mahatmas K. Ghandi, 148).There are so many plausible reasons not to break the law, in fact, it rules out any reasons to break laws. Think about it, you can’t protest, or rally if you’re sitting in a jail cell, and you can’t show your opinion when your confined.
His efforts caused India to gain its independence in 1947. This happened in the very year he went on a hunger strike. Susan B. Anthony was one of the world most famous suffragettes in American history.
Protests and collective action have also been successful in bringing about political change. For example, the Arab Spring in 2010 saw people in several Middle Eastern countries take to the streets to demand political reforms and greater freedom. These protests ultimately led to the downfall of several long-standing authoritarian governments. From the American Civil Rights Movement to the Arab Spring, people have used protests to fight for their rights and to stop injustices, have better treatment, and bring about change. These events highlight the power of collective action and show that when people come together to demand change and justice,
Some protests in the past have worked. For example, the Boston Tea Party. This conflict started when the British enforced a selfish act called the Tea Act. This act was made just to get the British East India Company out of debt.
Why is cheerleading should not be considered a club but a sport just as any other team. Cheerleading is not just a blonde bimbo waving a sign in there air. Cheerleading is defined as an encourager for teams a team motivator as well as a person with special crowd pumping skills. Cheerleading consist of strength, skills, and dedication. Dancing is considered a sport so why isn’t cheerleading?
“You must be the change you wish to see in the world” These astonishing words that Mahatma Gandhi said made me suppose that Civil Disobedience is a Moral Responsibility of a citizen because when breaking certain laws, a citizen perhaps incorporate a good intention or a bad intention for breaking it. Citizens break the law occasionally to have their beliefs be heard so change can be assemble. Some ways that Civil Disobedience can be a Moral Responsibility would be breaking the law for the right intentions. An example of breaking the law for the right intentions could be The Salt March that Gandhi Created or, Rosa Parks standing up for her beliefs about her actions, MLK wanting equal rights with caucasian. Illegal Immigrants coming into the
CHAPTER TWO-LITERATURE REVIEW 2.0 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study is to explore whether incentive structures influence stakeholder participation in collective action and the extent to which incentives explain success or failure of collective action. This chapter will highlight and discuss literature from various resources including peer-reviewed articles, books, journals and other publications around the issues that are the focus of this study. The chapter starts with a brief discussion on how the concept of collective action is defined and proceeds to discuss some of the key theories that explain this concept.