When India was in depression, the British East India company heavily taxed salt. Many civilians were not able to afford a necessity in cooking. In order to stand up for these monopolies, Mohandas Gandhi started the salt march. According to “Gandhi and the Salt March”, “Gandhi began a march from his communal village in western India to the coast to gather salt for free.” This explains how Gandhi stood up against the monopolies with his followers by walking through these marshes and boiling the water gained in order to produce salt which was illegal at the time.
The sanctions enforced by Nelson Mandela in South Africa acted as a drain on the economy (Doc C). Dr. King also “took part in the lunch counter sit-ins . . . seeking to integrate lunch counters,” joining the black student protesters who refused to leave when demanded to and getting arrested (Doc E). Gandhi sent a letter to the British government telling them that he would stage a salt march whether they liked it or not unless they removed the unfair salt tax.
"If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so. "-Socrates. Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society because the society is not free unless it's able to check the government. As long as the protest of the law remains peaceful it is a good thing. It is the public telling the government that they will not let them gain to much power and crush their human rights.
Initiating a violent protest will alert their communities of the issue but in a negative way. While a peaceful protest is more likely to positively bring awareness to the issue and spark change. Standing alone can be hard because it means going against social proof. People who stand alone on certain issues and beliefs notify their communities to the existence of a
Most peaceful protests get media coverage and evoke emotions and support within the public, therefore forcing the public to deal
Another example of a protest would be the Black Lives Matters movement that has been going on recently. People from the movement have been blocking freeways and even coming to protest at the Minnesota State Fair and disturbing the peace of everybody there and causing them to have much more security. I am not against what they are standing up for in the slightest bit, I am more just against the fact that they are out blocking major roads and intersections and are showing up protesting at a family function like the state fair. Not all of the friendly protests are so bad but I think that if they are putting other people at risk or in danger no matter it be physical, or mental danger or even just losing their jobs that they have, that, in my opinion, would definitely create a more negative impact on
If slaves never disobeyed the former laws defending slavery, there would still be slavery in America. As a human being, one disobeys purposely to make an impact on certain issues or events that society disagrees on and that is how progress is made. Disobedience is indeed a valuable trait that promotes social progress. In order to change or make an impact there has to be some form of disobedience.
Although peaceful resistance against laws created by the government has been recently used more frequently to express political dissent towards a government and is done entirely by civilians of their nation, it has been effective over the decades as political figures such as Martin Luther King Junior has proved. Peaceful resistance has proven effective only when there has been a truly repressive control on those protesting against their government. This truly repressive control must be something worth fighting for in order to make a reform that would improve society. For example, when women fought for their right to be included in suffrage, they succeeded and did so because their belief of the government’s restriction on them was truly something
If people know their cause, and rally about it peacefully, then great reform will happen. Violence and Law breaking, is not an acceptable form of civil disobedience, it does not solve any problems, in fact it causes new ones to arise. Gandhi knew this:"No country has ever become, or will ever become, happy through victory in war. A nation does not rise that way;"("On Civil Disobedience" by Mahatmas K. Ghandi, 148).There are so many plausible reasons not to break the law, in fact, it rules out any reasons to break laws. Think about it, you can’t protest, or rally if you’re sitting in a jail cell, and you can’t show your opinion when your confined.
If there is injustice, then you don’t even start with protest, you actually first attempt to negotiate some form of agreement between you and the “oppressor.” If that doesn’t work, then you come up with a peaceful plan, and then go forward with the protests. If one doesn’t go forward with civil disobedience unless there is an injustice then it can only really positively affect society. In fact, sometimes direct action is the only course that could be taken in order to stimulate the negotiation process with “stubborn
Like a fever, opinions and information are contagious and spread fast because of online interaction. As a result of this, many times there is a collective mindset that is formed on a particular issue relating to a revolution. Having people all recognize that there is a problem provokes a more meaningful response than just going to a protest. This response is usually seen within prompting the government to act on a particular issue, allowing for more substantial change to happen within the country. If there is a national problem and the general consensus has the outlook that something must be done about the problem, the government will be more likely to fix this problem.
Protests and collective action have also been successful in bringing about political change. For example, the Arab Spring in 2010 saw people in several Middle Eastern countries take to the streets to demand political reforms and greater freedom. These protests ultimately led to the downfall of several long-standing authoritarian governments. From the American Civil Rights Movement to the Arab Spring, people have used protests to fight for their rights and to stop injustices, have better treatment, and bring about change. These events highlight the power of collective action and show that when people come together to demand change and justice,
Throughout history, civil disobedience has helped societies grow and accept social reforms. The case of Martin Luther King, Jr.’s Letter from Birmingham Jail, is an important formal written statement for the need of social change. Civil disobedience has been a useful leveraging tactic in ways to draw attention to the perceived injustice. It has had huge impacts on societies in ways to create tension that
“You must be the change you wish to see in the world” These astonishing words that Mahatma Gandhi said made me suppose that Civil Disobedience is a Moral Responsibility of a citizen because when breaking certain laws, a citizen perhaps incorporate a good intention or a bad intention for breaking it. Citizens break the law occasionally to have their beliefs be heard so change can be assemble. Some ways that Civil Disobedience can be a Moral Responsibility would be breaking the law for the right intentions. An example of breaking the law for the right intentions could be The Salt March that Gandhi Created or, Rosa Parks standing up for her beliefs about her actions, MLK wanting equal rights with caucasian. Illegal Immigrants coming into the
CHAPTER TWO-LITERATURE REVIEW 2.0 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study is to explore whether incentive structures influence stakeholder participation in collective action and the extent to which incentives explain success or failure of collective action. This chapter will highlight and discuss literature from various resources including peer-reviewed articles, books, journals and other publications around the issues that are the focus of this study. The chapter starts with a brief discussion on how the concept of collective action is defined and proceeds to discuss some of the key theories that explain this concept.
