ipl-logo

Social Contract Euthanasia Essay

1060 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Arguments against euthanasia

One of the most widely debated topics in contemporary society is euthanasia. Euthanasia is the practice of intentionally ending a person's life to relieve pain and suffering, and it is controversial because it raises questions about the right to die, the sanctity of life, and the role of medical professionals in end-of-life care. In this essay, we will examine the positions of each side of the ethical debate and evaluate them using the moral theories of Ethical Egoism and Social Contract Ethics.
There are two main positions in the euthanasia debate: there are those who support euthanasia, that are known as "pro-euthanasia advocates," and those who oppose/dislike euthanasia, known as "anti-euthanasia advocates". Pro-euthanasia advocates argue that individuals have a right to die with dignity, and that euthanasia can relieve unbearable suffering. Anti-euthanasia advocates argue that euthanasia is morally wrong because it violates the …show more content…

While individuals may feel a personal obligation to want to alleviate any suffering one may be feeling, they also have a national obligation to follow which includes the laws of their country. From a social contract perspective, individuals should prioritize their national obligation to follow the law over their personal obligation to alleviate suffering. This is another controversial topic/debate that can argued in its own right.
A social contract ethicist would more than likely take the positions that euthanasia is morally wrong because it conflicts with the social value of the sanctity of life and the legal obligation to follow the law. A social contract ethicist would argue that society should instead focus on improving end-of-life care and providing individuals with the support they need to alleviate suffering without resorting to

Show More
Related
439 Words | 2 Pages

Ethically, how does one support the legalization of euthanasia? The idea of committing suicide, assisted or not, has been debated by both governments and religious spearheads since the 1900s, with the focus on whether assisted suicide or euthanasia should be considered a crime in the eyes of God and the state. The article "Assisted Suicide - Between the Right to Life, the Obligation to Live and Social Acceptance" poses the question: "If there is a right to live, is there also a right to die?" This showcases the idea of ethics behind suicide. Humanity, as a whole, values life as one of the most sacred principles of existence.

Read More
2330 Words | 10 Pages

Physician assisted suicide and or euthanasia is a major ethical dilemma in both the medical and political atmospheres. With a multitude of arguments on both sides it can be hard to conclude for yourself exactly where to stand ethically when it comes to euthanasia. Moreover, it is important to think independently and separate your own personal beliefs from medical decisions. Secondly, it is essential to respect the choices people make for themselves or their loved ones. While physician assisted suicide goes against many people's beliefs, it is more important to protect someone's bodily autonomy (or, to put it more bluntly, freedom) than to cater to a particular value system that is not shared by everyone.

Read More
1482 Words | 6 Pages

In society, euthanasia is considered to be “a good death,” which in other words is a painless way to die. This particular practice relieves the suffering of an individual from any amount of pain, which allows a patient to die in peace. This procedure is not accepted in the greater part of the United States because there is a fear that there will be a lack of medical care if euthanasia became legal. However, when a patient is euthanized, they are relieved of suffering and do not have to deal with consequences. I believe active voluntary euthanasia should be accepted in order to give terminally ill patients a chance to die painlessly.

Read More
596 Words | 3 Pages

The opposition might say that euthanasia is considered murder and that it sends a message that life is not worth living. However, I believe that euthanasia should only be an option for the terminally ill, this gives the patient a choice if they accept or deny the use of it. Majority of patients who are terminally ill have asked for euthanasia in court but were denied the use of it. Euthanasia is like putting a pet down, except in human form. We put our cats and dogs down when they are suffering, so why should it be different for a human?

Read More
1386 Words | 6 Pages

Euthanasia a global issue that raises a number of on-going ethical debates that are either in opposition to euthanasia or argue that human beings have autonomy over their lives. Many people despise euthanasia as they perceive such deliberate

Read More
1526 Words | 7 Pages

When the person dies, all pain and suffering he or she was feeling ends. There are a lot of moral issues that come along with the idea of euthanasia. It seems as though a lot of humans today view euthanasia as a selfish way out, similar to the views on suicide. In James Rachels’ book, The Elements of Moral Philosophy, he says that euthanasia goes against “the dominant moral tradition in our culture. That tradition is Christianity” (2012, p. 100).

Read More
3125 Words | 13 Pages

Euthanasia is a highly controversial issue that entangle concerns over religious, moral, ethical and compassionate arguments. It is extremely ambiguous to draw a straight line of what is right or wrong because right to life or die is considered differently according to countries and states. There are some people who are terminally ill whether young or old, those who wish to end their lives because they suffer from unbearable pain or believe they are a burden on their family and friends. They ask for euthanasia but there are also others who condemn them that the act of euthanasia is a violation of a basic human right, a ‘right to life’. DEFINITION OF EUTHANASIA AND ITS TYPES Euthanasia can be defined as the practice of ending a life in a painless

Read More
652 Words | 3 Pages

Euthanasia is a debated issue as it involve someone’s life be for voluntary euthanasia or non-voluntary. A considerable size of society support Euthanasia mostly because they feel that as a democratic nation, we as free individuals, have the right to make our own decision. However the right to choose when to die does not belong to us. I believe euthanasia is wrong with the following reasons.

Read More
2437 Words | 10 Pages

The word Euthanasia comes from the Greek word for a good death. The definition of euthanasia is the practice of assisting someone who is hopelessly sick or injured die quick and as painlessly as possible. This is what people will turn to when they get in a bad accident and cannot recover or someone who develops an untreatable cancer. Using this method has split people into two sides; the people for it, and the people against it. On the topic of euthanasia there is many different arguments: is it ethical, religions, will people try and use it as suicide, or to legalize it and allow people to use it as a planning tool in case they get an unfortunately none cure-able disease later in life, and is it okay to use it on people who cannot give consent.

Read More
869 Words | 4 Pages

Euthanasia, also known as assisted suicide, is the act of permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured patients. This is never suggested by the caretaker rather than requested by the patient or their family. Few areas such as the Netherlands have already legalized this practice. This debate, as split as a fork in the road, is over whether or not this approach should be legalized worldwide on stances regarding religion, ethics, and self choice.     I see this as being extremely unethical on both religious and social morality levels.

Read More
2780 Words | 12 Pages

At the point when the patient's advantage clash with the patient's welfare, diverse social orders settle the contention in an extensive variety of conduct. Mostly, Western medicine concedes to the wishes of a rationally equipped patient to settle on his own choices, even in situations where the therapeutic group accepts that he is not acting in his own best advantage. In any case, numerous different social orders organize beneficence over autonomy. 1 Cases incorporate when a patient does not need a treatment because of, for instance, religious or social perspectives. Because of euthanasia, the patient, or relatives of a patient, may need to end the life of the patient.

Read More
1512 Words | 7 Pages

Everyone has the right to choose to live or die. Death is part of life that can 't be avoided. This is a natural phenomenon in the process of life is birth, aging, illness and death. Euthanasia, in some words "Mercy Killing or Physician assisted Suicide. " Euthanasia is to help patients who despair and cannot be cured to die peacefully and to have free from suffering.

Read More
1203 Words | 5 Pages

The legalisation of active euthanasia is most logical step in addressing a terminally ill individuals’ choice regarding a dignified death, as well as what seems to be the laws double standards and unfair-discrimination regarding the choice of dying when an individual’s life may be interrupted and when terminally

Read More
1016 Words | 5 Pages

In a few nations there is a divisive open discussion over the ethical, moral, and legitimate issues of euthanasia. The individuals who are against euthanasia may contend for the holiness of life, while defenders of euthanasia rights accentuate mitigating enduring, substantial respectability, determination toward oneself, and individual autonomy. Jurisdictions where euthanasia or supported suicide is legitimate incorporate the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Switzerland, Estonia, Albania, and the US states of Washington. CLASSIFICATION OF EUTHANASIA Euthanasia may be characterized consistent with if an individual

Read More
1443 Words | 6 Pages

The most common location for the euthanasia act is in Netherlands but also in some other locations around the world. In the Netherlands euthanasia is also allowed without a parents or guardians consent. My argument is that I am pro euthanasia just because when you put yourself in a person shoes you would understand what they been through and the suffering pain they endure every day after the cause of illness. My opinion on this topic is that if I was in this predicament I would want to be able to choose whether or not I would like to choose a quick and painless death than suffering from pain and suffering on a daily basis.    The cost for the medication or what the lethal dosing item is less than 100 dollars but the cost of a assisted suicide can cost up to 100,000 dollars just to insure proper care of the patient to help the family in grief.

Read More

More about Social Contract Euthanasia Essay

Related Topics

Open Document