Terminally Ill Patients Who Are in Extreme Pain Should Have the Right to Euthanasia
Repetitive phrase: Terminally ill patients should have the right to choose euthanasia
Imagine your best friend has two weeks to live and during those last two weeks they are in extreme and agonizing pain. Would you rather let them live through those two weeks only for them to die in the end in unbearable pain or use euthanasia to bring their inevitable death closer and let them die painlessly? The answer seems obvious, doesn’t it? But still % of patients are denied use of euthanasia when they are suffering from a terminal illness. Terminally ill patients should have the right to euthanasia.
First of all, it is possible to keep a terminally ill patient alive for months and years on end, however, during this period of time, the patient would be in unbearable pain. The situation is fundamentally torture to keep a patient alive if they do not want to be. If a patient wants and consents to euthanasia and their case is hopeless, euthanasia can make an impending death come closer. This, in the
…show more content…
The opposition might say that euthanasia is considered murder and that it sends a message that life is not worth living. However, I believe that euthanasia should only be an option for the terminally ill, this gives the patient a choice if they accept or deny the use of it. Majority of patients who are terminally ill have asked for euthanasia in court but were denied the use of it.
Euthanasia is like putting a pet down, except in human form. We put our cats and dogs down when they are suffering, so why should it be different for a human? The most popular reasons for putting a pet down are illness, violence, and financial struggle. The financial struggle of caring for a terminally ill person is a huge burden on families; in one year, $55 billion was spent in Medicare for only the last two months of a patient’s