ipl-logo

Social Differences Between North And South

846 Words4 Pages

Ever since the United States had been a single nation, there had been many differences between the North and the South. Among these differences included social, economic, and political differences. Social differences included the two sides of slavery - Abolition and the Pro-slavery groups. The belief of Abolition, which was against slavery was mostly in the North, while Pro-slavery, which supported the idea of keeping slavery was the central idea in the South. The economic differences between the North and the South was mainly between industrial/manufacturing and the South’s reliance on cotton. The North had been focused on industrial/manufacturing without using slaves, unlike the South which had relied on cotton picked by slaves. Political …show more content…

The North and the South had many civil variations between their separate sides of slavery, Abolition and Pro-slavery. Abolition was the idea highly against slavery and the idea wanting to abolish it with supporters such as Angelina Grimke who believed that “slavery was a sin”(The Abolitionist) and Frederick Douglas who said that his “first encounter of slavery would haunt him to his grave”(The Abolitionist). Grimke as well as Douglass’s experiences and thoughts of slavery were concerning because what they said means that slavery was really disturbing to them and if it was alarming to them to the point of them wanting to abolish it means that it was really discomforting to see. On the other hand, Pro-slavery groups had believed that slavery was the South’s way of life. The South argued during one of their disputes with the North that if Slavery was to be abolished, their economy would be destroyed (Deverell & White). During the time that the North had been arguing with the South to abolish slavery, the South believed that if slavery was to be abolished that their economy would be destroyed because their slaves were the only ones picking cotton and other crops but the South did not want wage labor instead they wanted the slaves to do the hard work while they get paid. Social diversities between the North and the South was not the only conflict differentiating the two but so was their economical

Show More
Related
744 Words | 3 Pages

For many years leading to the Civil War slavery has been an ongoing argument between the North and the South. Both regions have their own arguments for either side of their cases. The North was strongly against the idea of enslaving human beings while the South saw the advantages of owning slaves. James Henry Hammond demonstrates that slaves are less beneficial to the economy because they cost more than free labor, although he does contradict himself, Hinton Rowan continues to explain the North demand for southern merchandise.

Read More
255 Words | 2 Pages

While the South's economy relied on cotton and the Cotton Gin, the North had other plans to gain control once again. The North, an extremely anti-slavery section of America was

Read More
933 Words | 4 Pages

The United States was divided into two sections: the North and the South. The differences between these two regions were so profound that they eventually led to conflict and war. One key factor contributing to sectionalism was economic differences. The North was largely industrialized, while the South relied heavily on agriculture, particularly cotton production. This resulted in starkly different priorities for each region: the North prioritized tariffs and other policies that would protect their industries, while the South demanded free trade so that they could continue exporting their agricultural products.

Read More
655 Words | 3 Pages

In the South, a social hierarchy developed. Wealthy plantation owners were at the top, white subsistence farmers were in the middle, and enslaved black people at the bottom. In the North, there wasn’t a social hierarchy that was developed. The North was generally “Free Soil”, meaning they supported the idea of wage labor versus slavery. The European immigrants that came to the North were able to settle into the cities and start working.

Read More
524 Words | 3 Pages

So if you did not like slavery, you moved to the North, and this only helped divide the people by their opinions. On document 1 there are 2 maps, one of railroads, and one of slave density and cotton production. This divide made the country’s economy completely different. While the North had almost no cotton production, the south is full of plantations creating slave based profit. The North used factories and modern technology for profit and the South was almost purely dedicated to raw materials such as cotton, hay, and other cash crops.

Read More
1020 Words | 5 Pages

The two opposing sides were the North and the South. The North, known also as the Union, was against slavery of African Americans and wanted it abolished. The South, also known as the Confederacy, believed in slavery. The South depended on slave labor for agriculture and their economy. The North thought it was morally wrong to enslave a man or woman.

Read More
484 Words | 2 Pages

Nick Baxter What caused the Civil War? DBQ The Civil War was caused by three main reasons are economic differences, interpretation of Constitution, and moral beliefs. The North and the South were very different economically.

Read More
602 Words | 3 Pages

Aspects of the question to be examined: • The extent to which there were meaningful differences between why the respective Northern and Southern segments of the United States wanted to abolish slavery • For purposes of answering the question, the ‘The North’ of the United States is synonymous with the Union states and likewise ‘The South’ is defined as those states which comprised the Confederate States of America • The significance of slavery in Southern society and whether it was comparable to that of pre-abolition North • The role played by the contrasting institutions of the North and South in hastening or hindering the abolitionist movement Historical debates: • One group of scholars stress the role of morality and personal values. Leon F. Litwack says that it was the public adoption of ‘principles used to justify the American Revolution’ which ultimately doomed slavery in the North. Eugene Genovese also rejects the notion of ‘dollars and cents’ being the motivation towards maintaining slavery in the South. Stephen Haynes and James Stewart underscore the importance that religion

Read More
1650 Words | 7 Pages

The North advocated for the abolition of the institution of slavery whereas Southern States vehemently opposed this proposal (Burton, 2011). This opposition was attributable to the fact that Southern States heavily relied on slave labor to support its expansive agricultural sector. The slaves were of African American descent. In sharp contrast with the Northern States the

Read More
502 Words | 3 Pages

In the town of Pennsylvania, Gettysburg, 3,000 Union soldiers prepared to face 60,000 Confederate soldiers in battle. The Battle of Gettysburg is known to have been the day the Union regained its ground. An estimated 50,000 soldiers were killed, captured or wounded. The battle turned out to be a crushing defeat for the Confederacy. However, if the Confederacy turned out to be successful in conquering the Union at Gettysburg, the outcome of the Civil War would have been different than things turned out to be.

Read More
1265 Words | 6 Pages

The easiest way they could keep their revenues high and increase efficiency was through the use of slaves. The North on the other hand was more industrialized. This meant that the workers they required had to be skilled and intelligent. Unfortunately at the time, the slaves from Africa were not taught the skills and were not thought to possess the intelligence required of the working force in the North. This caused tension to start building between the two

Read More
580 Words | 3 Pages

The North and the South had different economies due to the region that they were in. The ways that they worked were also different because of the terrain and the supplies/resources that were found in the area. In the North, the work was mostly based on manufacturing and factory work. Since the South is closer to the equator, farming was ideal in the South. They also required slavery in the South for plantations.

Read More
1131 Words | 5 Pages

The North was heavily invested in industry and had many of the major ports where they controlled imports and exports. The South was mostly consisting of plantations and produced many of the items that were traded. Both of these areas worked hard yet “...the North grows rich, and powerful, and grand” while the South struggled to find its power. The South did not have much to influence society because they mostly relied on the North both economically and politically. The Middle and lower classes did not want to “keep up this unnatural inequality in wealth” and wanted the right to “give to each man his original right to property”.

Read More
594 Words | 3 Pages

Prior to the Civil War, the north and south viewed liberty and freedom differently. Slavery was one of the issues that they did not see eye to eye on but also territorial expansion and tariffs on imports from other countries brought great opposition as well. Most slaves worked as agricultural laborers, but they were also employed in factories and mines. The success of the southern states depended on enslaved labor, and that dependence made the structure on slavery in the south all the deeper and inescapable.

Read More
524 Words | 3 Pages

The north has Bad farmland therefore they didn't have great agriculture. South has great farmland which meant they had a very good economy for agriculture and cash crops and much more. Secound was there various differences in the economy of the North and South. In the North for economy their was immigrants,textiles,cotton, and

Read More

More about Social Differences Between North And South

Open Document