Instead of protesting read and understand the topic and examine how your freedom and persona marginalized and mitigated on a collective unconsciousness
Martin Luther King Jr., Cesar Chavez, and the Newsies strike of 1889 are all examples of ordinary people wanted their ideas to be heard, that all men are created equal. Each and everyone of us has a voice, a voice
Technology is advancing very rapidly, but that does not necessarily mean it is benefiting society. In the article, “ Is Google Making Us Stupid”, Nicholas Carr explores how the internet alters people’s mental abilities. Malcolm Gladwell writes an article titled, “ Small Change”, in which he draws attention to how the internet has changed the engagement of social activism. Carr’s argument that the internet alters mental abilities, changes thought processes, and destroys concentration, complicates Gladwell’s thesis that the internet loses the meaning of social activism, changes how activist are defined, and takes over activism on a social level. The arguments presented are similar but the outcomes of the internet vary between the two writers.
Peacefully protesting for their rights, the leaders of these well-known movements decided to lead their campaigns in a friendly and non-violent manner. By following this tactic, they believed, would
Due the human nature, the pursuits of liberty, justice, and happiness have always been major concerns of humans throughout the history regardless of the way individuals connected and organized. Before phones or emails were even invented, the underprivileged individuals or groups congregated through “close ties”. In the recent years, individuals with “weak ties” adopt a different approach on similar activism with the help of various social media. Although these events are meant for similar intentions, their different communication methods induce an enormous distinction on their impacts, says Malcolm Gladwell in “Small Change: Why the Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted”. He depicts that the movements by people bonding with “strong-ties”(Gladwell 405) tend to impact the society with substantial advancement through “high-risk activism”.
Commemorating the ten-year anniversary of the assassination of civil rights activist Martin Luther King Jr, Cesar Chavez addressed a religious organization through an article he published within their magazine. A peaceful protestor of civil rights, Chavez justifies his organization’s actions by contrasting nonviolent protest tactics with violent ones as well as providing the differing effects of each. Cesar Chavez attempts to gain the respect of this helpful organization, so its members will identify with his movement. Desperate to obtain the approval of this organization, Chavez defines nonviolent protesting and believes it naturally gains the respect of outsiders.
These historic events would not have taken place, had it not been for the small groups of citizens that brought about change. Margaret Mead was correct when she said, “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.” The Civil Rights Movement has proved this to be true.
Populist Movement Success or Failure In 1892, a group of middle class farmers in the South and Midwest evolved creating what was known as the populist party. The populists came together to discuss how the government was ignoring the economic problems they were facing, creating lots of anger among the party, and resulting in the formation of the populist movement. Throughout this Movement, the populists were unsuccessful in ways of not accomplishing everything they hoped to receive in the future. If the populists were not completely successful in their Movement, then what did the populists receive from the revolt?
Even ten years after Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was murdered for his anti-racist actions, the battle against discrimination continued. As a civil rights activist, Cesar Chavez fights for workers’ rights. In his article, Cesar Chavez employs a convincing tone, contrasts, and allusions to convince his readers that nonviolent protest is the right way to create change in a community. Using this logos he has created, Chavez uses a convincing tone to sway his readers into agreeing with him. By stating that “nonviolence has exactly the opposite effect,” Chavez leaves no room for any argument with his strong word choice.
The Lost Cause was a set of attitudes, beliefs, white Southern ideals and arguments that coalesced together to form the white Southern narrative of Reconstruction, and the American Civil War. According to Blight, “for many Southerners it became a natural extension of evangelical piety, a civil religion that helped them link their sense of loss to a Christian conception of history. ”(Blight, 257) Moreover, the basic precepts of the Lost Cause movement was founded upon the idea of Southern victimhood, and Federal aggression that resulted with the decline and ignominious fall
Bringing about social change is no easy task, and there are specific components that Dr. Martin Luther King outlines in his “Letter from the Birmingham Jail” that are necessary to nonviolently protest injustices. He mentions four main steps: the collection of information to demonstrate the injustice, negotiation, self-purification, and direct action. After trying to make changes from within the system through the demonstration of information and negotiation, one must complete self-purification. This step includes preparing and steeling oneself for suffering that will come during direct action, which is a physical demonstration and frequently involves breaking a law. Suffering is often inevitable and necessary while attempting to achieve
The “None of us will ever forget” about 9.11. Yes, this is shocking, thank goodness for people willing to help. Social Movement is a problem in society that brings people together to fix problems. Social Movement is important because it helps us protest and the idea of expression of those who are disenfranchised. Social Movements help people make their voices heard and bring their own positions into society.
Violent protest and nonviolent protest in Civil Right Movement In American history, the period of the 1960s always was considered a decade of great social change. This is the era that the group of lower class or color skin became stronger and more confident to assert themselves even though white people still dominated every aspect of American society. During this period, American Civil Rights Movements emerged everywhere, such as Native-Americans Movement, Women’s Movement, Latino Movement, and especially African Americans Movement. By that time, there are many varieties of actions that civil rights activists waged to seek to end racial inequality and secure rights in political, social, and economic for African Americans.
“The civil rights movement was based on faith. Many of us who were participants in this movement saw our involvement as an extension of our faith. We saw ourselves doing the work of the Almighty. Segregation and racial discrimination were not in keeping with our faith, so we had to do something.” -- John Lewis
I work at a college radio station currently to get high school credits, and the best way to get your message out in today's society is to have a voice. Whether it be like mine over the FM, or over the Facebook, peaceful protests are what keeps people from becoming outraged, furious and dangerous to those around them. When someone doesn't like something, they won't sit back and do nothing, they will complain, they will act out, and they will protest, and as being American citizens we have the right to do that, but we don't always go to the peaceful routes. Take in Ferguson Missouri for example. While the protests, and acts of rage were not due to that of a law, they were due to the act of hurt and pain for the loss of a community member, they still acted out.
