ipl-logo

A Rhetorical Analysis Of Article By Cesar Chavez

403 Words2 Pages

Even ten years after Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was murdered for his anti-racist actions, the battle against discrimination continued. As a civil rights activist, Cesar Chavez fights for workers’ rights. In his article, Cesar Chavez employs a convincing tone, contrasts, and allusions to convince his readers that nonviolent protest is the right way to create change in a community. Using this logos he has created, Chavez uses a convincing tone to sway his readers into agreeing with him. By stating that “nonviolence has exactly the opposite effect,” Chavez leaves no room for any argument with his strong word choice. His repeated use of the word “we” adds to his sense of collaboration. By showing the reader that he is not alone in his fight against oppression and discrimination, Chavez uses the implied “might in numbers” to his advantage. This same convincing tone can be seen in how he lists the benefits of nonviolence and problems of nonviolence and issues of nonviolence. He convinces by stating that “nonviolence is more powerful than violence” and it can “support you if you have a just and moral cause.” By refusing to give any ground to opposing viewpoints in his article, Cesar makes sure that the reader can understand all of his points without looking at any downsides. …show more content…

In addition, he contrasts the deaths that are the “[expenses] of violence” and the lack of casualties through nonviolent means of protest, further strengthening his

Show More
Related
222 Words | 1 Pages

The author speaks to your brain's logic. Showing how there is no benefit to violence. In paragraph 11, Chavez uses ethos to convey his message of nonviolence.

Read More
800 Words | 4 Pages

The Gospel of Cesar Chavez: My Faith in Action, by Mario T. Garcia, uses Cesar Chavez’s own words to express his spiritual and religious personality and how it led him to organize a movement for a change in the farm workers’ lifestyle of America. Through his experiences and observations with religion and spirituality growing up, Cesar created his own myth by conveying nonviolence and self-sacrifice as the basis of his American religious experience. Thus, paving the way towards reform for farm workers. To be able to understand Cesar’s motive behind his movement, violence and nonviolence needs to be distinguished. A violent movement is a protest that is set up to achieve a goal by using violent acts (riots, house raids, etc.).

Read More
412 Words | 2 Pages

The audience that Chavez is addressing is very familiar with Dr. King, and the troubles he went through so it is not hard at all to relate to the audience with ideas of Martin Luther King. “ Nonviolence provides the opportunity to stay on the offensive, and that is a crucial importance to win any contest.” With subject of violent an nonviolent means is so important to almost everyone that it makes almost everyone stand on their toes. With the subject Chavez does a good job of stating “we” instead of “I” because of

Read More
786 Words | 4 Pages

Cesar Chavez, in his excerpt He showed us the Way, utilizes strong pathos, ethos and logos statements, precise diction, and valuable patterns of development to convey the power nonviolence has in fights for freedoms and rights. First, Chavez provides strong pathos, ethos and logos to convey the power nonviolent actions have to change the world for the better. He applies ethos to show that nonviolence is something that people are drawn to. In fact Chaves presents a great nonviolent advocate who lived during the segregation: “Dr. King’s entire life was an example of power that nonviolences brings...”

Read More
404 Words | 2 Pages

In the moralistic article written by Cesar Chavez, he uses several exceptionally persuasive literary devices to convey his contempt of violence and his aspiration for nonviolent resistances. He expertly plays on pathos and logos by using sanguine diction, a cordial tone, and juxtaposition. Chavez’s entire emotional appeal is based on the optimistic diction he uses to show he desperately wishes for a peaceful conflict resolution to violent or unjust situations. For instance, he writes that “Dr. King’s entire life was an example of power that nonviolence brings to bear in the real world.”

Read More
651 Words | 3 Pages

The assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. devastated a large majority of people around the world. His works of nonviolent acts against racism motivated many, including civil rights activist Cesar Chavez, to solve matters without resorting to inhumane behaviors. Inspired by Dr. King Jr.’s work, Chavez and his union of labor workers devoted themselves to helping those in need through peaceful protests. Similar methods are proven to be successful; Mahatma Gandhi, for instance, gained a great deal of supporters because of his pacifism and tranquil methods of boycotting against British domination. Despite brutal and savage methods of persuasion slowly gaining support, Chavez proves that nonviolent actions are superior; he does so by using ethos in order to uphold moral standards, logos (in reference to the past), and pathos to appeal to the emotions of his audience.

Read More
503 Words | 3 Pages

The Cesar Chavez article, that was published in a religious magazine, on the tenth anniversary of the assassination of Dr. Luther King Jr. advocated that people should use nonviolence to show power in their work. Chavez introduces anaphora when making an argument towards people that use violence as a solution for their problems. By using anaphora, Chavez repeats the word “nonviolence” as a frequency to get his point across. At the beginning of Chavez’s essay, he makes a claim that people should put Dr. King as an example of a nonviolence leader for equal rights.

Read More
154 Words | 1 Pages

In the excerpt “He Showed Us the Way” the author, Cesar Chavez, advocates nonviolence during a trying time is the true way to deal with struggles and injustices. First of all, Chavez explains Dr. King’s example is the right way to deal with struggling times that the colored faced. Human life is sacred and no one has any right to take violence toward another; in fact, violence does more damage in a situation then does nonviolence. Nonviolence is the way to accomplish justices morally and so much more powerful then violence. On the other hand, violence creates more violence and injustices.

Read More
662 Words | 3 Pages

The civil rights movement was a strong topic of discussion in politics during the mid-twentieth century. Martin Luther King Jr., one of the most influential leaders of the civil rights movement, was assassinated which caused many protests and calls for violence. In Cesar Chavez’s speech, he is telling the people that nonviolence resistance is the best way to go about the situation. Chavez’s uses juxtaposition, diction, and rhetorical appeals to strongly convey his argument about nonviolent resistance. To begin with, Chavez uses juxtaposition to contrast the effects of violent and nonviolent resistance.

Read More
636 Words | 3 Pages

To achieve this, Chavez connects and sympathizes with his audience: “We advocate militant nonviolence as our means of achieving justice for our people, but we are not blind to the feelings of frustration, impatience and anger which seethe inside every farm worker.” This line evokes feelings of justice because it convinces people to advocate for the causes they feel passionately about. He also uses adjectives like frustration, impatience, seethe, and anger to drive their motivations. Chavez also uses an admonishing manner to convince his readers: “Our conviction is that human life is a very special possession given by God to man and that no one has the right to take it for any reason or for any cause, however just it may be.” This line allows the reader to be inspired and rally for the civil cause.

Read More
691 Words | 3 Pages

A religious magazine article written by Cesar Chavez in remembrance of Martin Luther King Jr.’s tenth anniversary of his death. Cesar Chavez helped continue King's message of fighting for equal rights in a peaceful manner. Chavez helped to develop his argument of the fight for equal rights by using comparison while still highlighting King's major argumentative points of equal rights for everyone, including minorities. Chavez feels as though society today still is not fully grasping the aspect of equal rights and wants to help develop equality, especially minority groups. Chavez uses aggressive diction, comparing and contrasting, and pathos to help explain his side of the argument of the civil rights movement.

Read More
701 Words | 3 Pages

Towards the end of the excerpt, he writes that “the poor, the workers, the people of the land” get killed in violent revolutions (Paragraph 12). In order to connect emotionally with his audience, Chavez appeals to the real-life conditions of the general public and how violent resistance will end up killing them before it accomplishes any goal. Life over cause shows as a theme in his writing, where protesting peacefully keeps your resistance alive, and violent revolts end up killing it. Third, comparing violent protest to nonviolent, Chavez uses longevity to emphasize why violence does not work. Stating that violence provides a temporary solution, Chavez says that ”people suffer from violence” and non-violence brings people together (Paragraph 11).

Read More
429 Words | 2 Pages

Cesar Chavez was a civil rights leader, who was a huge advocate for using nonviolent methods to achieve what you want. On the Tenth anniversary of MLKs death, Cesar Chavez wrote an article to a religious magazine expressing his support for the methods of non-violence that Martin Luther King used by using Allusions, Juxtaposition, and diction to advocate that using non-violence is more beneficial than violence. Chavez uses an allusion to Martin Luther King Jr. to honor and bring more attention to his article. “Dr. King's entire life was an example of power that non-violence brings to bear in the real world”. MLK used many methods of non-violence such as speeches and peaceful protest to fight for equal rights and end segregation.

Read More
845 Words | 4 Pages

Chavez asserts repeatedly that nonviolence is the only way for change to happen. The repeated use of “we”, “us” and “our” conveys the message to the audience that he is one of them. Chavez can relate to the farm workers based on his credibility (ethos) because of his past. Chavez went to work on the farm fields at a young age and knew exactly how the frustrated workers felt.

Read More
409 Words | 2 Pages

In the first paragraph Chavez mentions Dr. Martin Luther King Junior, stating that Dr. King’s “entire life was an example of power that nonviolence brings…” This reference to Dr. King causes those who know of his impact to realize that he lead a strong historical example of what nonviolence could achieve. By using Dr. King as an example it indicates that Chavez thinks that if nonviolence had heavily impacted the past, then it would most likely do the same in the present and future. Chavez also makes a reference to Gandhi and his nonviolent boycott in India, claiming that what he taught “is the most nearly perfect instrument of nonviolent change.” By using the word perfect to describe Gandhi’s teachings of nonviolence, it further supports Chavez’s stance for nonviolent resistance.

Read More

More about A Rhetorical Analysis Of Article By Cesar Chavez

Related Topics

Open Document