Sociological Interpretation Of The Constitution Essay

1646 Words7 Pages

The words, “In order to form a more perfect Union,” are typically overlooked as just a saying that introduces the Constitution. Yet, now as I am more informed, those words stand out to me as a vague justification for the drafting of the United States Constitution. Following the Revolutionary War, freedom from the British throne gave to the United States the adoption of the Articles of Confederation in 1777. This was the first constitution to rule over our nation. Under the Articles the states held the majority of power and the federal government had only had few limited powers. There were many problems found within the Articles during the short time they were put in authority. Therefore, to correct these issues delegates came together in May …show more content…

This term basically means to agree reluctantly. Many people may have done this in 1787 when the Constitution was ratified and people do this now; maybe to federal laws such as the Affordable Care Act or State laws such as same sex marriage. I think this term diminishes, in a way, the idea of sociological legitimacy. The majority of people may completely disagree with the legalistic or moralistic ways of a law but are choosing to stay silent and just deal with it. People do this all for different reasons really, some of them being self-preservation, routine, and …show more content…

Maryland introduced the existence of implied powers. The enumerated powers, specifically listed in the Constitution, were very vague which gave government officials the idea of an extension. Many times, today and in history, judicial powers come from a different interpretation or an extension. In the constitution, there are long explanations of what congress and the executive branches can and cannot do, but it is not so specific for the judicial branch. Through the sociological acceptance, therefore legitimacy, the judicial branch has become what it is today where is decides the stances on major political