More handpicked essays just for you.
Socrates critique of democracy the republic
The use of rhetoric in plato socrates
The use of rhetoric in plato socrates
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Socrates critique of democracy the republic
Out of the three quotes, Socrates quote, best outlines my philosophy. In the words of Socrates, “An individual must do what his city or country demands of him or he must change their view of what is just.” This quote is basically saying that we have to follow what the majority of society believes, or change the view of society to what our definition of “just” is. Slavery is a great example because at one point it was accepted by the majority of society. Then much of society started to rebel against the idea, and realized that owning another human being was wrong.
The next is moderation, which was “a certain kind of order and mastery of … pleasure and desires ”. To describe it well to Glaucon, Socrates used the phrase “stronger than himself”. He explained that moderation was “used when that which [was] better by nature [was] master over that which [was] worse”. What he meant by that was men with this virtue could control the things that were bad and would not let these things to control their body and soul. Socrates then told Glaucon to look at their “young city” and he could find moderation.
In Euthyphro, Scorates had a method to find the true meaning of a word or subject. Socrates was a wise man because he use to always ask question until he reach an answer that fit everything they he belief in. This method was turn into Socratic Method that is use to question people. This is known as Socratic Method and is use to find the definition or true nature of what is justice. Socratic Method makes a person think in more detail when trying to find a meaning to a subject.
Regarding these ideals, it is necessary to analyze Krishna’s actions, Socrates’ daimonion’s actions, and the similarities and differences between the two. A few similarities can be gleaned from these two things, the advice and the daimonion. For example, they are both out of the body. Krishna comes to Arjuna, to contact him and to speak with him directly.
I believe that Socrates may be guilty of trying to corrupt the young people because he did encourage them to ask questions and not follow others’ blindly. Socrates did not overtly challenge the gods and their word, however he did encourage people, especially young people, to make their own opinions based on various information, and, in the end, follow their own thoughts. I feel as though the types of questions Socrates was asking were not harmful because he was only testing Euthyphros on how he knew all of his facts, and wanted proof of his opinions. Therefore, I believe people should question, should analyze information, and should form their own judgments rather than listening to someone else’s opinion and blindly following that
Socrates taught his pupils how to think by questioning and evaluating certain aspects of life in Athens from a more technical perspective. This new outlook could’ve caused young people in the community to find flaws with Athens and the government, and try to go against the standard, traditional ways of the community. By instructing his pupils to question how and where they live, Socrates was posed as a threat to the government. The government and other people in power believed that the youth, that was taught by Socrates may try to break away from the standards that were set, which can eventually lead to havoc within the
Making enemies and becoming the topic of conversation, the Athenians began to view Socrates as a threat to their beliefs and way of life and sought to end it. In order to end this, Socrates was accused of blasphemy (Mod1SlideC7). Socrates’s accusers took him to court and after Socrates did not play their game by asking to be sent into exile, and in the end, he was sentenced to death. After reading the textbook and Plato’s writing influenced by Socrates, I realized that in the period of his life Socrates was indeed truly a threat to the Athens society, because he looked for answers that no one else bothered to find which challenged their culture.
I find that truth now, is that you’re too stubborn to accept the lord as your god. I also know that evil is the absence of god. Therefore, everyone that has an absence of god in their lives is evil.” “Or maybe you need to take into effect that not everyone has to believe what you say,” Socrates said, “many people are not part of your religion are not evil. I believe the ignorance born of people like you who are ignorant.
Todd Eckerson and coauthoring students’ Jamie Linz, Charles Lugton, Robbie Miller, Lauren Polo, and Morgan Stair’s ‘Socrates Was a Bad Teacher’ is an evaluation of the teaching methods of the late great Socrates with respect to his interlocutor Meno. The authors of this article deem Socrates to be a bad teacher for three primary reasons. The first being his lack of communication of the expectations of his interlocutor in their dialogue. The second fault of Socrates is his presumptive judgements of Meno and his treatment of Meno accordingly. Lastly, the third reason as to why the authors deem Socrates a bad teacher is his willingness to give up on students.
“In a word, all that the soul undertakes and endures, if directed by wisdom, ends in happiness, but if directed by ignorance, it ends in the opposite” (Meno 88c). Although Meno and On Free Choice of the Will could not be on further ends of the spectrum, one arguing virtue and the other arguing evil, the arguments within these texts are analogous to each other; both are about the inability to learn a concept. Socrates argues that virtue is not wisdom and cannot be learned; it is a gift from the gods. Augustine argues that evil cannot be learned, as it is a simply a result of one’s lack of good will. Although one argument may not be more correct than the other, Augustine presents the stronger argument.
I found the story of Socrates trial, on pages 43-46, to be incredible. I always knew that history was full of surprises and amazing events. However, I had no idea that Athens had such a robust debate environment at 399 B.C.E. It seems like Athens was dealing with the same kind of political corruption that we, in modern society, must face in our politics today. It really proves the saying, “history repeats itself.”
Socrates: How good to see you Alekto, I have been looking forward to this discussion. Alekto: I too have been looking forward to this, it seems difficult for me to wrap my head around this concept. Socrates: Hopefully I will give you some good insight and be able to open your mind up.
In his innocent eyes, all he did was go out to talk and question the Athenian people. Although at times there may have been youth following him as he went out to question others, they simply were just there to listen. In the event that the youth may have come up with ideas of their own based off of Socrates’s conversations they heard, that is not direct teaching from Socrates. This is like when a parent tells their child not to touch a hot stove, yet the kid goes and touches it anyway. Children have a mind of their own regardless of what they have been told is right or wrong.
Socratic Dialogue The following conversation is one that takes place between Socrates and a Psychologist who believes that males are superior to women. John: It is quite unfortunate that we have tunnel vision when trying to achieve an egalitarian society in regards to males and females. Socrates: Before tackling your initial proposition, may I ask how you differentiate between male and female.
Philosophical thinking uses three acts of the mind: understanding, judgement, and reason. In order to have a sound argument all of the concepts must be applied. Socrates didn’t want to please the people by saying or doing what they wanted him to say or do. Socrates thought it was not important to seek wealth or fame; he was concerned with truth and virtue. He wanted to create an impact on humanity by relying on the truth and shining a light in people’s lives, even if they put him on trial.
