In the intercalary chapter number 25, Steinbeck shows the decay of morals and also physical decay in the chapter. He contrasts land that is used naturally for its nutrients, and land used, or in Steinbeck’s eyes, wasted for profits. The chapter has some apocalyptic overtones throughout. Steinbeck uses vivid imagery and harsh statements to convey his message. The chapter seems to show how there are consequences for interrupting the lands life force to line ones pockets.
Any successful piece ever published makes use of rhetorical strategies; that is being able to use language to effectively pull your reader in, and maintain their interest in order for the author to drive their point home. Two well developed examples of this are Matthew Crawford’s The World Beyond Your Head, and in Cathy Davidson’s Now You See It. In both of these books the authors are able to use rhetorical strategies in similar but unique ways to manipulate the reader.
Based on the readings and videos that you read/watched during week one, how would you describe “rhetoric”? What is “the rhetorical situation” and how do you see an awareness of this concept affecting your writing and behaviors? The word “rhetoric” is considered as the art of using language effectively and persuasively in any form of communication. So, it is omnipresent in our life.
Recognizing the enormity of conflict can often be difficult. In lines 41-73 of Book 22 of the Odyssey, Homer uses diction and juxtaposition of language to contrast the calm and flattery tone of Eurymachus with the harsh and stark tone of Odysseus, and to illustrate the magnitude of the conflict, as well as dialogue to illuminate conflict between the suitors and Odysseus. Homer utilizes these literary techniques to underscore the tension between the characters in the passage. Book 22 begins with Odysseus confronting the suitors about his dismay at them for occupying his palace with Penelope while he departed. Eurymachus then uses a calm tone full of flattery in an attempt to mitigate the conflict with Odysseus.
There are many examples of rhetorical devices and strategies presented within this speech, but the few that stand out the most are the use of pathos, anaphoras, and point of view. Elie Wiesel utilizes these rhetorical strategies throughout the speech to make the audience feel guilty as well as to come to an understanding of the atrocious events that occurred. Elie Wiesel structures the speech to move people and hopefully create peace activists like himself. Elie begins the speech by describing how a young boy who should be ignorant of most evils had come to know pain and anguish for the prematurely.
A and B are passing by on a street corner and disregard each other because they are on their phones. The narrator has a speech about the use of phones and how it affects life in present time. Choosing this path they are missing the opportunity to meet each other. This gives an example of how technology can distract us from bigger events. In the Act 2 The exact scene happens, but this time they are not on their phones.
Payton Ike Perine English 10 Hon 22 February 2023 Disintegration of the black body in America American writer and activist, Ta-Nehisi Paul Coates, attempts to address the issues that have plagued him his entire life in the article titled "Letter to My Son," in which he writes a letter to his 15-year-old son Samori Toure. The letter explains what it means to inhabit a black body and find a way to live within it in the United States. After 150 years since the end of the Civil War and ratification of the Thirteenth Amendment, he dissects the story of America's most immense movement, in a time when African Americans are viewed as inferior due to the color of their skin. Coates recounts different times in his own life when his innocence was lost, his internal sense of terror was threatened, and a wall of rage was erected around him. Throughout the use of syntax, figurative language, ethos, and pathos,
Amir is faced with a difficult task and he’s not willing to occupy. He use excuses, such as his life in San Francisco to make Rahim Khan understand that he can’t redeem himself. My reaction throughout the book is feeling entirely operated or manipulated. Reasons for my saying is the author's attempts at metaphor, symbolism, and foreshadowing are inelegant.
The key to happiness depends on whom you ask, but who is right? A19th-century French writer, Gustave Flaubert, believes: stupidity, selfishness, and good health dictate whether someone can feel happy, and that if “stupidity is lacking, all is lost”. He gives very specific and objective measures of happiness, but, how can a subjective emotion be governed by objective reasoning? Additionally, the reason we feel a specific emotion is due to an assortment of variables; how we were raised as children, how are parents act, how are friends act and even the weather effects our mood. Gustave Flaubert strongly believes stupidity is the strongest requirement for achieving happiness.
#CATmageddon: A Rhetorical Analysis As Aristotle said: “Quitting smoking is rather a marathon than a sprint. It is not a one-time attempt, but a longer effort.” The Truth is a national campaign designed to inhibit the use of tobacco in American teens. The campaign is made by Truth Initiative formerly known as the American Legacy Foundation, a public health nonprofit group created in 1999 as a result of “the Master Settlement Agreement between U.S. tobacco companies, 46 U.S. states, the District of Columbia, and five territories. Truth produces television and online content to promote anti-tobacco messages” (Wikipedia).
Really? Is all I can say to you how can you live with the knowledge of knowing your children breath no more because of your hatred for their father. Medea a true woman moves on with what they have left and makes the person regret what they have done to you by showing them that you do not need them to survive. The epitome of revenge is killing them with kindness and burying them with a smile. Jason was nothing more than a bed companion to you that was brought by simple want not need you left everything behind for one soul not anticipating the future.
In life difficulties may arise, but an “instructive eye” of a “tender parent” is a push needed in everyone’s life. Abigail Adams believed, when she wrote a letter to her son, that difficulties are needed to succeed. She offers a motherly hand to her son to not repent his voyage to France and continue down the path he is going. She uses forms of rhetoric like pathos, metaphors, and allusions to give her son a much needed push in his quest to success.
Euripides forwards Medea’s revenge through her use of Rhetoric in her dialogue. Rhetoric is language used intended to persuade or influence another person’s decisions or ideology. Medea’s use of Rhetoric conveys her cunning and deceitful nature in the play: she appeals to the ethical standpoint of the all-female Chorus, she appeals to the emotion of Creon to persuade him and Aegeus for her own advantage. Jason’s use of Rhetoric against Medea is exposed by her argument on the ethics of marriage that he has tarnished. Medea uses Ethos, the persuasion through ethical arguments, to appeal to the female Chorus who live in a patriarchal land.
While creating my rhetorical analysis paper I used all of my typical writing processes. I began this assignment by selecting a commercial that I thought would be the most appealing in the superbowl. After selecting my commercial I did some research at the library using EBSCOhost. I then created an outline on what my paper would be about and pieced all of its parts together. In the future I will try to recieve help earlier on because at first I struggled to understand what the purpose of the paper was.
In the play Antigone, Sophocles demonstrates the conflict between family and God through the characters of Antigone, Ismene and Creon. Antigone being ambitious and strong willed throughout the play, fights for his brothers honor and proper burial while Ismene on the other hand, is more timid fears the consequences that may occur if the laws are broken. For Creon he is the King and holds most power, until the Gods feel he is incapable. Antigone, Ismene and Creon all use logical and emotional appeals to achieve a compromise to either bury Polynices or not.
