ipl-logo

Special Admissions Case Study

2013 Words9 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Should athletes receive compensation

Module 3 Questions

1. Farrey suggests that NCAA schools should do away with special admissions for athletes and athletes would have to go through the normal admission standards to get into the academic institution. a. While this idea seems ideal theoretically, is it really practical? Why or why not? Would the talent level for top-tier schools like Florida, Alabama, and Texas be the same without the special admissions and which schools would benefit from such a system?

I don’t believe NCAA schools will ever get rid of special admissions for athletes. Special admissions mean schools receive special talent. I don’t believe you should compare athletes to known athletes because they don’t go through the same path. According to Farrey, an athlete …show more content…

When Alabama won the 2016 national championship I read a story about how much money the coaches received for winning and the players, well they received shirts and hats. As noted in the readings, many athletes don’t receive a full ride nor every athlete receive an athletic scholarship. I believe if an athlete is a part of an athletic program then they should have everything paid for in terms of room and board, tuition, meal plan, books and even extra money for transportation, hygiene, and entertainment. No player who works for an athletic program averaging 30 hours a week should have student loan debt. I don’t think athletes should get paid because the purpose of college for everyone is to get an education to better your future. Athletes are being paid in terms of receiving money towards their education. Being a student-athlete is not a job, so we don’t need to worry about who the number one pick will be coming out of high school. This will create a bidding war among colleges and the NCAA will lose control of intercollegiate athletics. Coaches’ salaries should be reduced and more money should go into more scholarships. Every athlete deserves a full ride. Players should receive weekly per diem which should cover non cafeteria meals and living

Show More
Related
1312 Words | 6 Pages

You find one prime example of this when looking into the University of North Carolina academic scandal. The university was more concerned about making sure the athletes were eligible to play and would be able to represent the school. In an Article about the case,U.S Justice Department Official, Kenneth Wainstein stated the “office administrator Deborah Crowder typically handed out assignments then high grades after only a scan of the work” (Ganim and Sayers). In the report done by CNN written by Sara Ganim and Devon Sayers, they discuss the University of North Carolina offering “paper classes” and how “advisers funneled athletes into the program to keep them eligible.” (Ganim and Sayers)

Read More
956 Words | 4 Pages

Athletes who receive a full scholarship do not have to worry about paying off student loans because they do not have

Read More
1103 Words | 5 Pages

College sports is one of the best-known entertainments around the world. But for the athletes, they are students first then athletes second. For college student-athletes, there are a variety of scholarships and grants to help pay for college or college debt. However, some critics say that student-athletes should be paid a salary like pro athletes would, with help from scholarships or grants. The authors of, College Athletes are being Educated, not Exploited, Val Ackerman and Larry Scott, argue that student-athletes are already paid by free education and other necessities.

Read More
818 Words | 4 Pages

In conclusion, athletes should only be paid enough to support themselves and be able to have some luxuries that they deserve. The reasons they should only be paid that much is because it will save the NCAA a substantial amount opposed to if the athletes were paid if they were 4 Works cited professionals. If athletes were paid they would be able to put food on the table and it

Read More
1944 Words | 8 Pages

Should College Athletes Receive Compensation for Performing? Most people prefer college sports over professional sports simply because the athletes are more driven and have more passion for the game they love. The discussion of whether college athletes should be paid or not, has been ongoing for years now. Some believe compensating amateur athletes would take the enjoyment out of college sports, while others argue that these athletes deserve a paycheck for their tremendous amount of work and efforts on the field and courts. College athletes should not receive compensation to perform because they are students before athletes.

Read More
485 Words | 2 Pages

Millions of Americans are watching March Madness. Advertisers make millions, and so do schools and the NCAA, but not the players. Just this weekend, President Barack Obama said it's time for the NCAA to rethink the way it protects and punishes athletes. "The students need to be taken better care of because they are generating a lot of revenue. It doesn't matter whether they get cut, it doesn't matter whether they get hurt.

Read More
814 Words | 4 Pages

College is a place for students to obtain a college degree and help them to get ahead on their “real world” careers. Athletic departments in college have become huge money incomes in the past ten years; college football and basketball are even shown on the television. This has resulted in many believing these athletes deserve to be paid for their contribution to the schools athletic income. However athletes in college are given the opportunity to play the sport that they love as well as receive a top education. For some players a $20,000+ per year tuition is not enough, they want to be paid with more than just a scholarship.

Read More
750 Words | 3 Pages

If the NCAA can earn millions of dollars from student athletes, shouldn’t athletes retain their fair share? NCAA Student Athletes deserve to be paid because their hard work and time is the driving force behind the profit and popularity of the NCAA. All of the ticket and merchandise sales, television revenue, promotions, and other sources of income go to the NCAA, the schools, the coaches, the event staff, and others involved – except for the athletes creating the value of the NCAA. The NCAA finished the 2014 campaign with just under $1 Billion in revenue, which is more than the NHL and NBA.

Read More
666 Words | 3 Pages

The NCAA Is using the players for their worth. NCAA student athletes barely make by with a low paying job and studying/training up to 50 hours a week. NCAA student athletes deserve to get paid. “College sports will become more honesty once players are paid, and more honorable. Fans will be able to enjoy football and men's basketball without having to avert their eyes from the scandals and the hypocrisy.

Read More
564 Words | 3 Pages

COLLEGE ATHELETES SHOULD GET PAY FOR PLAYING Over a long time Athletes have push their best to the sport they love, They have work hard for days, weeks, and years gust to show how good they are for universities. Most of these colleges’ players have to deal with a lot of stuff, some of them can barely afford college, other have to deal with injuries and well the worst one is not having a job and putting all your effort in the sport they love. Coaches vs Athletes Why should college coaches get paid so much when the players are winning the games? Nebraska state Senator Ernie Chambers, a longtime supporter of providing stipends to college athletes, who submitted a bill in 2003 that would allow football players at Nebraska to be paid a stipend Quotes, "Sometimes, it just doesn't seem fair.

Read More
1770 Words | 8 Pages

Although college athletes draw in a substantial amount of revenue, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) should not compensate athletes in the form of a salary as though they are employees. Collegiate sports have been around for many years, yet the athletes have never received compensation for playing. Athletes have never been referred to as an employee of the school therefore they are not on a payroll. There have even been restrictions passed to limit the scholarships given out, such as the Sanity Code. “In 1948, they passed the Sanity Code, permitting the awarding of scholarships and jobs, but with the important

Read More
863 Words | 4 Pages

These numbers show that these colleges do not care about the athlete off the field, off the court or once that athlete gets

Read More
1538 Words | 7 Pages

College athletes deserve to be paid because they are the only ones not being paid in the college sports industry. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) generates eleven billion dollars annually, some of which could, and should go to college athletes. “USA Today reported last year just how much money the top 10 coaches in college football made. Nick Saban from Alabama topped the list earning roughly $5.5 million in 2013 alone” (Seibold). The coaches are making millions of dollars and the players aren’t.

Read More
1489 Words | 6 Pages

When student-athletes received full scholarships, they should be privileged and thankful since the cost of higher education is very expensive. Student-athletes need to understand the circumstances and take of advantage of getting their degree from a well renowned university since the percentages are very slim to none on having a professional career in sports. The purpose of a student-athlete is to be a student first and then an athlete second. The main focus should be on earning a degree, and not worrying about when is the next game on the schedule. Many people are stating that college athletes should get paid, but how about the general student body that has little to nothing and working a job earning minimal pay.

Read More
742 Words | 3 Pages

While they may receive full or partial academic scholarships, not a single college athlete is paid. The National Collegiate Athletic Association, which regulates 23 sports at 1,200 schools across the US, has repeatedly argued student-athletes should not get salaries. While Paying students would make sports more competitive, athletes in college should not be paid because college students are financially irresponsible, there is no fair way to pay college athletes, and most college athletes get sports scholarships which is payment enough. First, athletes in college should not be paid because college students are financially irresponsible. While college students acknowledge the importance of being financially responsible, many don’t actually

Read More

More about Special Admissions Case Study

Related Topics

Open Document