Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reforming juvenile justice system
Reforming juvenile justice system
Reforming juvenile justice system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reforming juvenile justice system
Reforming juvenile justice system
Reforming juvenile justice system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Reforming juvenile justice system
There are indication that most criminals have a juvenile records in the US, indicating that crime manifests from a tender age. Therefore, to reverse the incidence of crime, it follows that the best strategy is to reduce the criminal orientation in the juvenile offenders as opposed to hardening them and preparing them for criminal careers. The case of the Crossroads Juvenile Center demonstrates the willingness of the juvenile justice systems to make these changes on the children. References Day, S. (2014). Runaway Man: A Journey Back to Hope.
Not only does Berstein call for an overall reform of this nation’s juvenile prisons, she goes as far as saying the practice of locking up youth is in need of a “more profound than incremental and partial reform” (13). The fact that Bernstein outlines the numerous failed strategies and goals of this practice with her compelling use of studies and statistics is enough to promote an audience to reject the practice of locking up youth. The statistic she shares that “four out of five juvenile parolees [will be] back behind bars within three years of release” as well as the studies she conducted on numerous instances when a guards abuse of power lead to the death of a child work to further prove her point: being that “institution[s] as intrinsically destructive as the juvenile prison” have no place in a modern society (13, 83). Bernstein refutes this false sense effectiveness further by sharing her own ideas on what she believes works as a much more humane solution to rehabilitating
Everyone has heard of the juvenile justice system; however, how many people have dealt with it firsthand? Not many people actually know what goes on behind the closed doors of these “rehabilitation centers” and the injustice that occurs within. Instead of rehabilitating children, the juvenile justice system treats them as adults, leaving them helpless and on a straight path to failure. The multi genre piece (MGP) called “Juvenile Justice System,” written by Brooke Hermiller, brings to light the unfairness caused by the juvenile justice system. Hermiller’s argument regarding the corruptness of the juvenile justice system is strengthened by her use of multiple genres, including letters, narrative stories, articles, and even a recipe.
This can be seen in the growing number of court-involved status offenders who were being detained and placed outside of their homes for noncriminal behavior (Shubik & Kendall, 2007). Following multiple studies and research, the President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice recommended that the juvenile court be the agency of last resort and that community-based organizations, not penal institutions, should be responsible for these youths (Shubik & Kendall, 2007; Farrington,
H.R. 1809 was recently introduced to the House on 03/30/2017 and the purpose of this bill is to help provide much needed reform in the juvenile justice system. H.R. 1809 is an amendment to the “Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974” (H.R. 1809). This bill looks into young adults who have entered into the system “as the result of sexual abuse, exploitation, and trauma” (H.R.1809). May Biblical guidelines: The Bible supports restorative and rehabilitated justice.
Teen Court Teen court also known as youth courts is a juvenile justice system program that permits teens to try and sentence their fellow peers for committing minor and status offenses. The main purpose of the teen court is to make young offenders accountable for their wrong doing by paying the price for their offences. However this system keeps first time offenders away from the Juvenile system and gives them a chance to change. In order for a youth to be considered to serve on a teen court, the young individual must be 8th to 12th grade with good academic standing, the teen must be nominated by teacher, parent or him or herself, an application must be filled up and signed with the parent’s approval.
The main goal was to be able to prevent delinquency and improve juvenile justice system by providing local and state efforts with discretionary and block grants that supplied support to youth programs developed by public and private youth agencies. Each state has four requirements they must achieve and maintain to receive the formula grants program which are “deinstitutionalization of status offenders, separation of youth from adults in secure facilities, removal of youths from adult jails and lockups, and addressing disproportionate minority contact with the juvenile justice systems.” Failure to acheive and maintain these four requirements will result in a decrease which isn’t effective for the youth who are entering the juvenile justice system since their goal is to prevent and provide services that will change and shape their future. The main type of facilities that are provided by this act are juvenile detention centers, long-term secure facility, reception center, and diagnostic center. These facilities were provided to give the children a sense of how the adult system operates, but provide many inside resources that work toward helping them return to their life in a safe and healthy way so they will not
Juvenile justice faces an uncertain future. Despite this fact, it continues to operate under the “parens patriae” philosophy upon which it was built. The system now incorporate elements of due process and adapts to the changing demands placed on it.
In the late 1960s and early 1970s, the United States Supreme Court issued a number of decisions that expanded the rights of children in juvenile court proceedings. The Court began extending due process rights to juveniles in Kent v. United States. The Court no longer accepted the premise that children should not have constitutional rights because of the special nature of the juvenile court. According to the Kent Court, "the child receives the worst of both worlds: that he or she gets neither the protections given to adults nor the solicitous care and regenerative treatment postulated for children" "(Kent v. United States 383 U.S. 541 (1966)", 2015, para 35).
Within the urban communities, negative perceptions are magnified. Adolescents are more prone to be a product of their environment, especially those whose parents are incarcerated. Because of this trend adolescents are being incarcerated at an alarming rate and sentenced to adult facilities. Lambie & Randall (2013) states, the United States have imposed harsher penalties on serious young offenders, and have consequently increased rates of incarcerated youth and made it easier for youth to be treated and incarcerated as adults within the justice
Juvenile detention centers are purposeful ways to assist delinquent juveniles to become law abiding proactive members of society while promoting the safety of society and themselves. Yet, the way most institutions, in particular Cook County Juvenile Temporary Detention Center (CCJTDC) treat juveniles in their center has violated their essential right to be treated as humans, cast them as oppressive beings, and does not adequately facilitate their re-transition into society. While I agree that there should be a degree of penalty for breaking laws, there is a clear line between punishment that is just and that which is unjust. Punishment for the sake of realigning an individual’s behavior to comply with social order is just, however punishment
There are many children in the world who are being put behind bars and detained for alleged wrongdoing without protections they are entitled to. Throughout the world, children are charged and sentenced for actions that should not be considered as adult crimes. Here in the United States, the minimum age of criminal responsibility is age 12. Law enforcement officials and those in the juvenile justice system nationwide tend to mistreat underage individuals by trying cases while working through the lens of an adult. Unfair punishments are still handed down domestically, which is in violation of Supreme Court law.
There are differences between a juvenile court and criminal court in the United States. The focus of the juvenile justice system is on rehabilitation, in hope of deterring the minor away from a life of crime so they will not commit a crime again as an adult. In contrast, the criminal justice system focuses on the punishment and often bases the sentencing outcome on the criminal history of the youth. In a study conducted, Butler (2011) showed that the participants’ experience with adult jails and prisons show that those facilities may instill fear but are otherwise emotionally—and often physically—dangerous for youth. Many of the adult prisoners, who were minors when they enter the adult institution, felt they were forced to “grow
The most prevalent problem in the juvenile justice system is the presence of mental disorders. Studies show that more than two–thirds of juveniles in the juvenile justice system experience mental disorders. I find this problem interesting because mental disorders are complicated. On the other hand, if the disorder is treated during adolescence and behavior is corrected, there is a higher chance of rehabilitation. Estimates of victimization, include sexual victimization, in juvenile facilities vary; some estimates indicate that almost two–thirds of youths are victimized.
Throughout the course of modern history, the views of adolescence have led to them being considered inferior to those older than them. Often times, young adults and children are represented as unknowing, which therefore allows for a measure of control to be had over them; moreover, the ideas of inferiority are also present in regard to race and race relations. In Nancy Lesko 's article, "Denaturalizing Adolescence: The Politics of Contemporary Representations," and in Barry C. Feld 's book Bad Kids: Race and the Transformation of the Juvenile Court, they argue that those in power, be them adults, white individuals, or both, have a measure of control over those considered inferior. During the history of the world, the value of adults has