ipl-logo

How Did Joseph Stalin Distort Marxism

1282 Words6 Pages

Part A:
This research paper sets out to answer the question; to what extent did Joseph Stalin 's five year plan distort Marxism?. The time period of Joseph Stalin 's control and rule was from 1924 through 1953. This research paper will discuss to what extent Stalin distorted Marxism and if any of his plans was followed verbatim. The resources being used in this essay consists of websites such as Center for European Studies as well as websites created by professors from colleges such as Brent N. Silva.

Part B:
After the war, Vladimir Lenin, who was a Russian politician was worried about the current state of the country 's economy since socialism was not working. The solution to that problem that Lenin adopted was called the New Economic Policy …show more content…

But in reality, Stalin 's policy did not only diverge from Lenin 's intent, but also applied a somewhat superficial understanding of Marxism. When Stalin 's rule first started, he abruptly changed the system from agriculture to industrialization creating a two year starvation from the peasants and working class. On top of that, he deported people who disagreed with his decisions on how to run the Five Year Plan or even kill them. Not only that, but Stalin used the prisoners as labour since they were cheap and in large masses. If they refused or wanted to rest, they faced deportation. On the other hand, Karl Marx who created Marxism, believed in motivating the workers to make a change in their country and helping them raise their status as well as making everyone equal to each other which is essentially the idea of Marxism. While Stalin never tried to help the working class and simply treated the peasants as slaves whereas Marx says that workers should have a minimum wage when being paid. Showing that Stalin took Marxism to an extreme level and not even following the basics of it that would be making everyone equal and no one is better than

Show More
Related
774 Words | 4 Pages

From 1928, when the plan started, to 1932 to its end, many factories, dams, power stations and even cities were being built. Despite there being harsh penalties implemented to workers for failure to meet their targets, there was still a significant increase in Russia’s industrial growth in a very short period of time. Just like the emancipation of the serfs in 1861, under Tsar Alexander II, in protest of Stalin’s policies, the peasants, in protest, refused to work harder than they needed too, causing them to destroy livestock and crops, which eventually lead to their unnecessary death. Stalin, just like the Tsarist autocratic regime, was not committed to collectivism but preferred capitalism in his ruling of the Soviet Union. This caused a lot of rebellion from the Kulaks who opposed collectivism.

Read More
784 Words | 4 Pages

The best way to answer any question is to be clear about what is being asked and to look only for the facts of that question. We are not being asked whether Joseph Stalin was a good person. The question is, what are the accomplishments of Joseph Stalin that improved his country and made it great? From this point, we can clearly identify what he did, as seen in the articles. Was Stalin beneficial to the USSR?

Read More
509 Words | 3 Pages

Following the death of Vladimir Lenin in 1914, Joseph Stalin took up his position as leader of the Soviet Union. After rising to power, Stalin made drastic changes to Russia that was still torn from war at the time. With his power, Stalin aimed to bring Russia to the top of the world. In the end, while he pushed the Soviet Union’s economy to new heights, his methods were cruel and had negative impacts. After the war, Stalin was determined to turn Russia into a great industrial power.

Read More
614 Words | 3 Pages

Stalin vs. Mussolini During the 1930s and 1940s, two leaders by the name of Joseph Stalin and Benito Mussolini were in control of the Soviet Union and Italy. Stalin and Mussolini were very similar, but yet so different. Stalin was born on December 18, 1879, and eventually changed his name from Losif Dzhugashvili to Joseph Stalin.

Read More
696 Words | 3 Pages

Stalin didn’t just use the secret police to crush the hopes and dreams of his people. He also banned religion. This was done because he believed in science and he didn’t want people to focus on life without communism. (Document Four) Stalin’s political actions can be seen as completely tyrannical but he did impact society as

Read More
1518 Words | 7 Pages

Stalin had full control of the media, which he used to sway positive public opinion from his effective and massive propaganda skills. This is what gave him the ability to carry out his plans and execute anyone he wished without opposition. He saw himself as the all-powerful leader who could save his country. He would blame democracy, fascism, and Marxism for causing problems in other countries and that communism was the only way to go. His communist party

Read More
1319 Words | 6 Pages

Fordham University entailed, "if there were a proletarian dictatorship not only in our country but in other, more advanced countries as well, Germany and France, say. If that were the case, the capitalist encirclement could not be so serious a danger as it is now, " With these three quotes excerpted thus far, it is clear to see that Stalin played the victim card, making the Soviet Union seemed completely doomed. To fix this awful problem, the answer lied in the rapid industrialization he desperately wanted and eventually achieved (Fordham University). Stalin also explained on the Soviet Unions issues internally. Fordham University stated, "But besides the external conditions, there are also internal conditions which dictate a fast rate of development of our industry as the main foundation of our entire national economy.

Read More
654 Words | 3 Pages

After the Russian Civil War in 1922 they formed the Soviet Union with fifteen other bordering states. Lenin also made the New Economic Policy (NEP) to take land from the rich and giving to the poor. While during his rule, he inflicted harsh rules. One was man-made famine, another slave labor camps, and even death upon detractors who tried to voice their opinions. The man-made famine caused to citizens to give their crops to Lenin, and in turn he gives them no profit, but uses it to support his army.

Read More
526 Words | 3 Pages

This idea was to start economist reconstruction. Gorbachev had the idea that these reforms would help people make good wages, and help with better living conditions. However, perestroika was not successful. Though it was meant to boost the economic activity it was slow to kick-in.

Read More
482 Words | 2 Pages

Cheerleading helps build your academic skills in school. In school girls and boys have to keep a 70 or higher in regular school. If you do not keep a that grade you will get “benched”, and will not be able to cheer for that time, until students are able to bring their grades back up. “Cheerleaders may not fail any course and must maintain an overall 70 average. 2.

Read More
124 Words | 1 Pages

I would have to agree with Timasheff’s idea wholeheartedly being that Stalin created a dicatorship in which he held all the power and repressed workers because he believed it was necessary for the "good of the state". He also reinforced and revised his early work, Foundations of Leninism (1924) to create a revamped view of Leninism that would support his twisted policy which painted a pleasant picture of collectivism and industrialism, which is reality was the exact opposite. Stalin also believed that the class struggle intensified after the revolution, which is shown in The Great Purge through how the Communist Party (mostly Stalin) sought out enemies and dissenters in its own ranks as well as in society and had them executed/exiled/sent to

Read More
1012 Words | 5 Pages

War communism had a devastating impact on the peasants and proletariat in Russian society between 1918 and 1928. However, the New Economic Policy that followed the Civil War effects was opposite, raising living standards and reinstating support for the Bolshevik party. Vladimir “Lenin” Ulyanov, known as the head of the notorious Bolshevik party, introduced War Communism (1918-1921) and the NEP (1921-1928). As Martin McCauley states “If War Communism was a leap into socialism then the New Economic Policy was a leap out of socialism” The aims of War Communism and the NEP were both successful in a large number of areas, however, the effects of both policies were not all favourable.

Read More
1543 Words | 7 Pages

Andre Abi Haidar PSPA 210 INTRODUCTION It is always difficult to write about and discuss Karl Marx, or more importantly the applications of Marx’s theories, due to the fact that he inspired and gave rise to many movements and revolutionaries, not all of which follow his theories to the point. Although Marx tends to be equated with Communism, it might not seem righteous to blame him for whatever shortcomings occurred when his theories were put to the test; Marx passed away well before the revolution in Russia, and he played no role in the emergence of the totalitarian regime at the time. When discussing Marx, however, Vladimir Lenin is one of the biggest highlights when it comes to studying the outcomes of Marx’s theories.

Read More
879 Words | 4 Pages

Karl Marx was a German philosopher and economist in the 18th century. He is known for his book the Communist Manifesto that was published in 1848. Marx believed that a revolution of the working classes would over throw the capitalist order and creates a classless society. The Industrial Revolutions led to the proletarianization; his partner Friedrich Engels explained why the changes created by the proletarianization of the worker would develop into a huge problem for industrial societies. I do believe that Karl Marx’s vision of communism in the Communist Manifesto could re-emerge as a popular and workable philosophy of social, economic, and political organization.

Read More
1486 Words | 6 Pages

Karl Marx (1818-1883) considered himself not to be a sociologist but a political activist. However, many would disagree and in the view of Hughes (1986), he was ‘both – and a philosopher, historian, economist, and a political scientist as well.’ Much of the work of Marx was political and economic but his main focus was on class conflict and how this led to the rise of capitalism. While nowadays, when people hear the word “communism”, they think of the dictatorial rule of Stalin and the horrific stories of life in a communist state such as the Soviet Union, it is important not to accuse Marx of the deeds carried out in his name.

Read More

More about How Did Joseph Stalin Distort Marxism

Related Topics

Open Document