ipl-logo

Stanford Vs Kentucky Case Study

586 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Dred scott v. stanford case

Stanford v. Kentucky Stanford vs Kentucky is a supreme court case that caused major controversy. This court case was argued on March twenty-seventh of 1989 but was not decided until June twenty-sixth of 1989. This court case is based on a murder trial that was committed by Kevin Stanford in Kentucky. The court cases No. is 87-5765. This trial was difficult because the killer was only seventeen years old. His age determined if he would be held in a prison of juvenile center (LII). This is a murder crime committed by Kevin Stanford on January seventh of 1981 in Jefferson County, Kentucky. Stanford shot Barbel Poore and killed her at the age of only seventeen years and four months. Poore was only twenty years old at the time of death. She was a gas station attendant that Stanford and an accomplice stole three hundred cigarettes …show more content…

Then he suggested they could have beaten or tied her up and threatened her instead. He let out chuckle in the court room. Stanford did not find this to be a serious crime. Unfortunately for him the court thought otherwise. Now the real question would be should he be tried as an adult or as a minor? A Kentucky Juvenile court stared hearings to get him out of the juvenile facility to be transferred to a trial for adults. Another case stated that the statute could be voided if it was a Class A felony, Capital crime or is over sixteen years of age. The court ruled that trialing him as an adult would be in the best interest of the petitioner and the community. He was tried as an adult and convicted of murder. He was also convicted of first degree sodomy, first-degree robbery, and receiving stolen property. His sentence was forty-five years of prison time and then a death sentence. Stanford demanded to have a “constitutional right to treatment” but was denied (Capital Punishment in

Show More
Related
242 Words | 1 Pages

In Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, the Supreme Court ruled that the medical

Read More
560 Words | 3 Pages

Facts surrounding the case The case of Batson v. Kentucky was a case about an African American man found guilty of burglary. The jury for his case was all white. He subsequently appealed his conviction based on an all white jury. The judge for the case dismissed several potential jurors for legitimate reasons, but Batson contended that the black jurors were dismissed to weigh the odds of a conviction against Batson with an all white jury.

Read More
241 Words | 1 Pages

As with the previous trial, the “intent of purpose” comes into effect here. Each person had a slightly different role in acquiring their case, but it still falls under the same offense. They were both charged with sexual assault of a minor, and received due punishment. In conclusion, my experience of

Read More
515 Words | 3 Pages

Bearman v. Notre Dame 453 N.E. 2d 1196 (Ind Ct App 1983) Facts: The plaintiff Christenna Bearman and her husband sued the University of Notre Dame for the damages that resulted from an injury occurring on October 27th, 1979. Mrs. Bearman’s leg was broken when an intoxicated person after walking away from fighting with another intoxicated man fell into her from behind, knocking her down as she was returning to her car after a Notre Dame football game. During the incident there was no security or ushers in the area. Mrs. Bareman argued that she was a business invitee and there was a sense of duty of care that the university should have had for her.

Read More
840 Words | 4 Pages

Due to Kent at the time being on probation, his past criminal history and the crimes that he was arrested for the right way to handle the charges would be through being charged as an adult. In cases like these with juveniles, it is best if the judge waives the case, so that it can be taken to a higher court. Taking a juvenile's case to be tried as an adult can be a good thing because there are times where the juveniles don't get the proper punishment for the crimes they've committed. I believe that when it comes to juveniles and they commit a severe crime they need to be punished just as if they were an adult. Juveniles don’t always get the proper charges to the fact they are under the age of 18.

Read More
558 Words | 3 Pages

The case of Florida versus Jardines was heard before the Supreme Court on October 31, 2012 and a decision was made on March 26, 2013. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Jardines. This case challenged the fundamental core of the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable search and seizure. The ruling of this case has impacted how law officials handle searches and the use of drug dogs. This case also challenged the boundary line of where personal property starts.

Read More
2380 Words | 10 Pages

Christopher Simmons managed to avoid the death penalty due to the controversy of executing a

Read More
643 Words | 3 Pages

Since Richard was only sixteen years when the incident occurred. At this age, adolescents are still developing their cognitive and emotional skills, and charging them as adults may not be appropriate. The justice system should take into account their age and consider the possibility of rehabilitation, rather than punitive measures. Furthermore, Richard had no previous incidents this severe, and it would be unfair to judge him based on one mistake he made as a teenager. Slater further informs us about how when you are young your brain is still developing and during that time your body is

Read More
322 Words | 2 Pages

Overall, Stanley “Tookie” Williams did not deserve clemency. First, according to the article, “As a Criminal” it says “Williams scheduled to be executed at San Quentin State Prison Dec.13 for the shotgun murders of four people…” In other words Williams killed 4 people for what he was held in prison

Read More
772 Words | 4 Pages

If the court were to give him treatment and rehabilitation, Stanford would have spent countless years in prison and rehabilitation centers. The rehabilitation process would have taken many more years than Stanford’s initial sentence, which was a total of forty five years and the death penalty, and would have included thousands of therapy like sessions to somehow prove that a person as insane as him was able to go back into the world as a normal United States citizen. The court had been very reluctant to give stanford's overage sentence at his prime age, at the time of the crime, of seventeen years old due to the fear of his punishment being cruel and

Read More
1056 Words | 5 Pages

Even though Marin Sinzer was considered a minor at eight years old when he murdered his neighbor, Tammy Shevin, now he should be charged as an adult. The problem now is if Marin should be charged as a minor or an adult because of the age Marin was when he committed the crime. Marin should be charged as an adult because he is now thirty-eight years old and is not a minor anymore. He knew what he did was wrong and decided to withhold evidence from the police for twenty-five years. There is no statute of limitations for murder in Missouri, so Marin could be tried for this murder at any time.

Read More
579 Words | 3 Pages

My thoughts Forensic science is used everywhere. It can be used to arrest and convict someone of a crime. Before watching The Real CSI video, I thought using fingerprints and DNA will get you 100% accurate results. Throughout the video my thoughts about the subject began to change.

Read More
964 Words | 4 Pages

The criminal justice system was created in order to punish people who choose to break the law. Some people believe they are above the law and decided to do whatever they like regardless of the consequences. Children and adults are both responsible for the actions they commit. The criminal justice should tried children as adults for committing felonies because a crime is a crime regardless of the age of the individual. This can be fulfilled by punishing juvelives with the correct sentence, by seeing that they know their actions lead to consequence and they have the proper process for a teen to be tried as adult.

Read More
1160 Words | 5 Pages

Therefore, when a person argues that a juvenile was not aware of their crime is a discrediting claim. In 1990 in the city of Chicago, a couple expecting their first child were murdered in cold blood in the hands of a juvenile teen. The teen shot both the husband and the wife who pleaded for their lives and the life of their unborn child. Author of “Juvenile Justice Information Exchange”, Jennifer Jenkins states, “He reported to a friend, who testified at his trial, about his ‘thrill kill’ that he just wanted to ‘see what it would feel like to shoot someone’”. This killer was aware of his crime and was aware of who his victims were due to planning the murders months before.

Read More
635 Words | 3 Pages

He was later tried for murder. For decades, euthanasia has been relevant, slowly phasing in and out of legalization for years. Some people may consider euthanasia to be in legal limbo, due to each position being balanced, and it isn’t something my people like to think about. Each side of this argument is usually the same. People believe euthanasia should be illegal, and often refer to euthanasia as assisted suicide.

Read More

More about Stanford Vs Kentucky Case Study

Related Topics

Open Document