Cultural background and varied styles in negotiation and leadership
- (Taking Indian styles of negotiation and leadership of Indira Gandhi to study) India comprises of Twenty eight states and seven union territories . it is the seventh largest country by area and second largest country by the population. India is the home land of `Indus Valley civilization`(one of the ancient civilizations) and a region of historic trade routes. Four famous religions Hinduism , Buddhism , Jainism and Sikhism originated in India.The invasion of different countries( Dutch , French , British etc.) as well as religions (Christianity , Islam ) and the trade relation
…show more content…
And to explain the leadership styles in India it is necessary to mention Mahathma Gandhi, who is the father of nation in India. Gandhi`s non-cooperation movement in 1920 which awakened whole country to fight against British. His fight against British East India Company ,attracted worlds attention to India , Non-violent freedom fight. The people comes under one leader to fight against British , where Gandhi himself never belived in leadership. He was leader showed the way by his own life.After all it was a people concerned leadership in which he used a democratic way to take a decision. S.D Shibulal C.E.O and M.D of the Infosys India, came up with the same ideology of Gandhi, that `Leadership by example` ,“The leaders should not ask anyone else to do something that they are not willing to do“.(From an interview of Mr:Shibulal to INSEAD Business …show more content…
At the year of 1969 she nationalized largest banks in order to make more money and credits available to small business and farmers. At her period india tested first nuclear missile.Indira was the backbone for implementing `White revolution` to combat malnutrition among children . Her involvement in bringing India to a fastest developing economy is significant. And her remarkable leadership is history of India and it her period is considered as the golden era. So her leadership was successful by giving priority to production as well as people