Introduction This paper will state the basis of EEOC v. Ruby Tuesday, Inc. A brief summary will be provided to give context to the results and outcome of the court case. Reactions to this case will be discussed, with analysis into the outcome of the case and whether some were surprised by how the case occurred. Additionally, potential routes that Ruby Tuesday could have taken to avoid violating the law will be mentioned. Summary and Analysis of Case In 2013, the restaurant chain Ruby Tuesday denied an opportunity to work in Park City, Utah to two male employees on the basis of gender as they claimed that the employment opportunity was meant for “females-only” (US EEOC, 2015). The opportunity meant to provide employees with the chance to work …show more content…
The outcome of EEOC v. Ruby Tuesday, Inc. resulted in the restaurant chain paying employees Andrew Herrera and Joshua Bell $100,000 and commit to taking steps to prevent future sex discrimination (US EEOC, 2015). Ruby Tuesday sought to prevent future discrimination by providing training to all of its managers on employees under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The company also had to report its training efforts to the EEOC as well as post reminders of this outcome to its restaurants and its online presence through its website. Some were surprised by the gender discrimination taking place towards men instead of men, however, they were not surprised by the outcome of the case (Phillips, 2015). What was most surprising to many was how blatant Ruby Tuesday was in their request for only women to apply for the position made in an internal company posting. In many cases, gender-based employment is rarely justified, making it a slippery slope for businesses that choose to argue for doing