ipl-logo

Summary Of EEOC V. Ruby Tuesday, Inc.

624 Words3 Pages

Introduction This paper will state the basis of EEOC v. Ruby Tuesday, Inc. A brief summary will be provided to give context to the results and outcome of the court case. Reactions to this case will be discussed, with analysis into the outcome of the case and whether some were surprised by how the case occurred. Additionally, potential routes that Ruby Tuesday could have taken to avoid violating the law will be mentioned. Summary and Analysis of Case In 2013, the restaurant chain Ruby Tuesday denied an opportunity to work in Park City, Utah to two male employees on the basis of gender as they claimed that the employment opportunity was meant for “females-only” (US EEOC, 2015). The opportunity meant to provide employees with the chance to work …show more content…

The outcome of EEOC v. Ruby Tuesday, Inc. resulted in the restaurant chain paying employees Andrew Herrera and Joshua Bell $100,000 and commit to taking steps to prevent future sex discrimination (US EEOC, 2015). Ruby Tuesday sought to prevent future discrimination by providing training to all of its managers on employees under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The company also had to report its training efforts to the EEOC as well as post reminders of this outcome to its restaurants and its online presence through its website. Some were surprised by the gender discrimination taking place towards men instead of men, however, they were not surprised by the outcome of the case (Phillips, 2015). What was most surprising to many was how blatant Ruby Tuesday was in their request for only women to apply for the position made in an internal company posting. In many cases, gender-based employment is rarely justified, making it a slippery slope for businesses that choose to argue for doing

Show More
Related
1169 Words | 5 Pages

In this case questioning workplace harassment in terms of sexual discrimination and its prevalence to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Joseph Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services distinguishes whether or not discrimination can occur within the same sex. Joseph Oncale, a male, filed a complaint against his employer, Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. The petitioner was working at one of respondent’s service stations and he was part of an eight men team. In the complaint, Mr. Oncale is alleging that he was sexually harassed by his co-workers John Lyons, Danny Pippen, and Brandon Johnson.

Read More
820 Words | 4 Pages

“From 1979 to 1998, Lilly Ledbetter worked as a supervisor at Goodyear’s plant in Gadsden, Alabama. Over the course of her career, her pay slipped when compared to the pay of men of equal experience and seniority. She sued the company, alleging pay discrimination on the basis of her gender under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Goodyear argued that the discriminatory act was the decision to pay her less, which took place many years ago and that therefore her lawsuit is too late. In a 5–4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled in Goodyear’s favor”, (Lilly M. Ledbetter, Petitioner V.

Read More
157 Words | 1 Pages

The Supreme Court ruled that the company’s employment requirements did not appertain to applicants’ ability to perform their job duties, and was also discriminatory towards African-American employees. I believe this

Read More
759 Words | 4 Pages

The Title VII’s disparate-impact provision inhibits employment practices that have the unintentional effect of race discrimination (Walsh, 2016, p.114). Even though Congress enacted Title VII for the main purpose of confronting racial discrimination in the workplace, courts have continued to struggle to appropriately address the prevalence of subtle racial discrimination that burdens minority applicants/employees today (Ritenhouse, 2013). Another legal issue included in this case is North Hudson refusing to implement non-discriminatory hiring procedures that do not disproportionately exclude African-Americans from employment without evidence of business need. The employer also refused to correct the effects of previous discriminatory practices. As an end result of this case, the District Court held that the employer’s business-necessity justification was insufficient and that there were alternative means to achieve the goals stated that were less

Read More
110 Words | 1 Pages

“A series of legislative initiatives and decisions made by the Supreme Court of the United States defined the possibilities of affirmative action policy” (Finkelman, 2004). Affirmative action is such a controversial topic which has been brought up in many Supreme Court cases. In Griggs v. Duke Power case in 1971, the court argued “Title VII” bans “not only overt discrimination but also practices which are fair in form but discriminatory in operation.” (Finkelman, 2004). To eliminate discrimination processes under Title VII, all employers began to hire and recruit more minorities.

Read More
582 Words | 3 Pages

In the article, ‘SXSW panels: Latino, black boys an untapped population in tech world’ written by Jazmine Ulloa, focused on the issue of EEO laws in relation to black and Latino males. EEO laws highly focuses on the discrimination of females in the work force. Companies are encourage to higher more females into their organization. “Studies show women tend to make up 20 to 30 percent of the tech sector” (Ulloa, 2016, para.6). Although this shows improvement of companies accepting women into their work force in the tech industry to increase diversity, they still lack in other cultures; the tech industry lacks in the demographic of black and Latino males.

Read More
2372 Words | 10 Pages

Legal and cultural changes over the past forty years resulted in numbers of women and people of color into companies’ professional and managerial ranks. Despite these remarkable advances made in the United States world of business, the political correct side of things is a double edged sword. “While it has helped many traditionally underrepresented employees to experience their workplace as more inclusive, the PC rule book can hinder employees’ ability to develop effective relationships across potentially divisive group differences. Companies need to equip workers with skills—not rules—for building these relationships” (Davidson). Essentially, a company cannot mandate a high-quality relationship as successfully as one that is formed through discussion and learning tools rather than laws.

Read More
967 Words | 4 Pages

On the other hand, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act attempts to remedy the “structural imbalance of the court system” by regulating private employers (Han, Week 3 Lecture, 1/23/17). Title VII uses statutory laws to regulate private employers from discriminating against characteristics like race and sex in the workplace by threatening the profits of these private entities (Han, Week 3 Lecture, 1/23/17). Unfortunately, these Title VII claims face their own barriers in court, making it difficult to use subtle discrimination to prove inequality. The limitations of these approaches are evidenced in cases like Washington v. Davis Sup. Ct. (1976), Griggs v Duke Power Co Sup.

Read More
4343 Words | 18 Pages

I. BACKGROUND The history of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (hereinafter referred to as Title VII) is very intriguing. It is connected with a southern filibuster against federal civil rights legislation in the United States. This southern filibuster ended by the U.S. Congress for the first time in June 1964, while, on July 2, President Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 into law (Arnesen 2007, p. 251). Given this, Title VII, Equal Employment Opportunity, should be considered the most significant part of the whole Civil Rights Act of 1964, because Title VII stimulated visible rise in minority and women group employment.

Read More
789 Words | 4 Pages

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission or EEOC is a federal agency that administers and enforces civil rights laws against workplace discrimination. The EEOC was established on July 2, 1965. The EEOC investigates discrimination complaints based on an individual's race, children, national origin, religion, sex, age, disability, gender identity, genetic information. The EEOC's first complainants were female flight attendants, however at first the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ignored sex discrimination complaints, and the prohibition against sex discrimination in employment went unenforced until 1963.

Read More
1707 Words | 7 Pages

By 2008, African-American participation in official and managerial positions had increased to 6.94 percent, indicating that by forbidding employment discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, gender, or national origin, it should improve access to work opportunities in a number of sectors. The act applies to businesses with at least 15 employees, as well as state and municipal governments, employment agencies, and labor unions. While prohibiting several forms of discrimination, such as hiring, firing, promotion, wage, and other employment terms and conditions, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) enforces Title VII requirements. III. Main Impacts of the Policy Based on Paul Frymer’s Article Paul Frymer's article suggests that courts are considered the least harmful government branch because their limited enforcement powers prevent them from directly imposing policies on society.

Read More
1026 Words | 5 Pages

Montana State Board of Regents (1976) is an example of a case of alleged gender discrimination by an employer. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendant had “policies and practices of discrimination against females in a class, specifically with regard to the underutilization of women in certain departments, salaries, promotions, and…on…university committees and in important administrative and policy making positions” (Mecklenberg v. Montana State Board of Regents, 1976). In this case it was found that the underutilization, as alleged, was an indication of discrimination and the plaintiffs won the case (Mecklenberg v. Montana State Board of Regents,

Read More
1323 Words | 6 Pages

“Women Face Discrimination in the Workplace.” Women Face Discrimination in the Workplace, 2006, https://go.gale.com/ps/retrieve.do?tabID=Viewpoints&resultListType=RESULT_LIST&searchResultsType=MultiTab&hitCount=5&searchType=BasicSearchForm¤tPosition=3&docId=GALE%7CEJ3010407206&docType=Viewpoint+essay&sort=Relevance&contentSegment=ZXAY-MOD1&prod. Accessed 21 February

Read More
1299 Words | 6 Pages

If you are a female applying for a job, you do not get to see what the other people’s resumes look like. You do not know if you are the most qualified person out of them all, therefore you will not be able to prove that if you do not get hired, it was because of gender discrimination. While some people may say that gender discrimination no longer exists, that is not the case. Over the past 40 years, improvements have been made, but there is still more progress that needs to be done. Females on average make 78 cents on the dollars compared to men (Gerdeman 2017).

Read More
866 Words | 4 Pages

Movements like the Fight for $15 campaign and efforts to improve working conditions in industries like fast food and retail demonstrate the ongoing struggle for fair labor practices. Another Labor Rights Movement that has evolved over the years is the Women’s Labor Rights Movement. The Women’s Labor Rights Movement has been pivotal in advocating for gender equality in the workplace, addressing issues like the gender pay gap, discrimination, and harassment. Today, it remains relevant as women continue to push for fair treatment, equal opportunities, and better working conditions. This movement has spurred policies such as parental leave and protections against discrimination, but challenges like the gender pay gap and underrepresentation in leadership.

Read More

More about Summary Of EEOC V. Ruby Tuesday, Inc.

Open Document