ipl-logo

Summary Of James Mcculloch V. State Of Maryland

750 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Judicial review importances

James McCulloch
v.
State of Maryland
17 U.S. 316
Supreme Court of the United States
Certiorari to the Maryland Court of Appeals
Decided March 6, 1819

Facts and Procedural History: The facts of the case are as followed:
The second bank of the United States was chartered by Congress in the year 1816, but because of that, two states prohibited the bank from operating inside of their boarders. Now that the state of Maryland made it known that it did not want that National Bank, in 1818, the Maryland legislature made a tax on loan operation of Baltimore Branch on the second bank of the U.S. So one of the workers, James McCulloch refused to pay tax. He took it to court in which he lost in Baltimore County court, and affirmed by Maryland’s court …show more content…

McCulloch then appealed to the Maryland Court of appeals and was still found guilty. Lastly, McCulloch appealed to SCOTUS.
Arguments Heard by the Court:
McCulloch:
This side mainly argued that making a national bank is not stated in the U.S. Constitution, but it is an implied power. But the main argument that was used by Daniel Weber is that if Maryland was able to tax the bank, Maryland would take abuse.
Maryland:
The main argument stated by Luther Martin, who represented Maryland, was that creating the National Bank was not stated in the Constitution. He also argued that if something like a national bank is within their borders, they have a right to tax them.

Justice Stephanie Burgos delivered the opinion of the Court: We granted certiorari in this case to determine:
1. Did Congress have the power not specifically given in the Constitution?
2. Did the state government have the right to refuse a national government law?
After careful review and consideration, we …show more content…

So for example, if there is pollution in all of the water in the United States and all water is contaminated, Congress would have the right to be able to make a national water filter for the whole country just because it is “necessary and proper” for all of America. So, in this case, Congress can make the law of creating a national bank for the better of America to be able to carry out its (Congress) functions like collecting taxes and dealing with the

Show More
Related
643 Words | 3 Pages

In response to this, “The Maryland legislature responded to this action by levying a tax on all branches of banks “not chartered by the legislature”—a move aimed at destroying the Baltimore branch of the Bank of the United States."1James McCulloch who was a banker at the branch in Baltimore refused to pay the annual tax. He was convicted by Maryland state court and fined a total of 2,500 dollars. Losing at the state

Read More
736 Words | 3 Pages

Super Founding Bros™ The 2nd chapter consists of a dinner held by Thomas Jefferson to discuss issues of debt and the placement of the nation’s capital. It starts off with Hamilton telling Jefferson about his financial plan reaching a congressional stalemate and that James Madison was the leader of the opposing congressional faction. Jefferson offered to host a dinner for Hamilton and Madison so that they could resolve the issue through conversation. The problem is solved when Madison agrees to not pressure the other congressmen into voting against the financial plan and Hamilton will in turn try to locate the nation’s capital along the Potomac river which would be beneficial to the southern states of which Madison is a part.

Read More
582 Words | 3 Pages

Document A: The Rhode Island Assembly wrote a letter to the Congress, addressing them that they don’t agree with placing taxes on imported goods. The Congress wanted to place taxes on imported goods as a source of income, but first, all of the states had to agree with this. This was around the time when the Articles of Confederation were ratified. Their central government was based on the Articles of Confederation; yet, they had weaknesses in some areas. Taxing was one of their weaknesses.

Read More
610 Words | 3 Pages

The chief justice resolved the case by providing answers to three issues. The first issue was whether Marbury had the right to

Read More
538 Words | 3 Pages

Dred Scott v. Sandford was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court on US labor law and constitutional law. The case was decided in 1857 with a 7–2 decision. Scholars today believe it is one of the worst Supreme Court decisions of all time. Dred Scott was born a slave in Virginia in the 1790’s. In 1830, he was bought by Dr. John Emerson.

Read More
811 Words | 4 Pages

Maryland passed this law to tax the federal bank. McCulloch, the President of the bank refused to pay the tax. The State of Maryland sued McCulloch, and the Supreme Court accepted the case. In the opinion written by Chief Justice Marshall, the Court ruled that the Bank of the United States was constitutional and that the Maryland tax was not. The Supreme Court said that the Bank of the United States has every right due to the Necessary and Proper Clause of Article I, Section 8 which stated that Congress can pass laws that they consider “necessary and proper”.

Read More
933 Words | 4 Pages

Woodrow Wilson once referred to the Supreme Court as “a constant constitutional convention in continuous session”, due to the role they have played in interpreting the constitution as it is written. Due to the ambiguity found in much of the phrasing in the constitution, judicial interpretation of the constitution can be considered both necessary and inevitable (Comer, Gruhl et al., 2001). The courts have the power to declare unconstitutional the actions of the other branches and units of the government in what is known as judicial review (Tannahil, 2002). The first case in which the court elaborated on the principle of judicial review was that of Marbury v. Madison in 1803 and put forward that in the case of conflict between the constitution and a statute, it is “the duty of the judicial department to say what the law is” (Smith, 1975). Following this, the case of Fletcher v Peck (1810) is of equal importance as it was the first case in which a state law was declared by the court to be unconstitutional.

Read More
556 Words | 3 Pages

In Marbury v. Madison (1803) it was announced by the Supreme Court for the very first time, that if an act was deemed inconsistent with the constitution then the court was allowed to declare the act void. Thomas Jefferson’s secretary of state, James Madison, denied William Marbury of his commission. President John Adams appointed William Marbury the justice of peace for the District of Columbia during his last day in office. Madison denied Marbury of this commission because he believed that because it was not issued before the termination of Adams presidency, that it was invalid. Marbury himself started a petition, along with three others who were in a similar situation.

Read More
946 Words | 4 Pages

After a fiercely fought revolution, the newly independent American nation struggled to establish a concrete government amidst an influx of opposing ideologies. Loosely tied together by the Articles of Confederation, the thirteen sovereign states were far from united. As growing schisms in American society became apparent, an array of esteemed, prominent American men united in 1787 to form the basis of the United States government: the Constitution. Among the most eminent members of this convention were Alexander Hamilton, Aaron Burr, James Madison, and Thomas Jefferson. These men, held to an almost godly stature, defined the future of the nation; but were their intentions as honest as they seemed?

Read More
1403 Words | 6 Pages

Gordon 's premise in Hamilton 's Blessing is that the national debt can be used positively in order to boost the economy of a country like the United States. In the book, Gordon uses economic history and theory to examine the start, rise and decline of the United States debt. The author opens his book by stating that this country was born in debt, and this debt has become so high that concerned individuals no longer think about it. Hamilton 's Blessing charts the history of the national debt since when the central bank of the United States was founded in 1971, up to modern days. The intellectual architect of this creation was Alexander Hamilton, the first Treasury Secretary as well as a central figure who had a deep impact on the economic

Read More
840 Words | 4 Pages

Marbury pushed to sue James Madison for not receiving the commission, but under the Judiciary Act of 1789 the petition brought to the Supreme Court was declared unconstitutional and therefore illegal along with James Madison not delivering the commission. Thus the case ended establishing judicial review, which led to a set of rules that put the state and federal powers in check. The reason judicial review is so important is because it gave the federal court the power to decide whether or not something was

Read More
390 Words | 2 Pages

The duty of any criminal prosecutor is to seek justice. A conviction is the end of justice being served prior to sentencing; however justice cannot be served if an innocent person is found guilty. Even though the prosecutor(s) are there to represent the public and has the duty to aggressively pursue offenders for violations of state and federal laws, they shall never lose sight or their own moral compass of their main purpose is to find the truth. In the pursuit of truth, the United States Supreme Court has developed or made rulings in reference to several principles of conduct which have to be followed by all prosecutors to assure that the accused person(s) are allowed the proper procedures and due process of the law granted by the 14th Amendment.

Read More
674 Words | 3 Pages

He had to pay the $15,000 annual tax and refused. McCulloch was fined $2,500 when a Maryland court convicted him. He went to the Maryland Court of Appeals and failed there, and then he went to the United States Supreme Court in

Read More
651 Words | 3 Pages

After the American Revolutionary War, many Americans were opposed to the idea of a strong central government. They saw the idea of a strong centralized government as a gateway back into the familiar tyrannical government and abuse of power that they had just fought so hard to free themselves of. The idea of creating a new Constitution was unnecessary to some because the Articles of Confederation were already in place. The non-supporters of the newly proposed Constitution called themselves “Anti- Federalist.” Naturally, many of the supporters of the new Constitution felt that it was very much needed and they felt as if the Articles of Confederation were not strong enough to functionally run the government.

Read More
478 Words | 2 Pages

Madison court case that took place in 1803. The law that was declared by the Supreme Court at this hearing was that a court has the power to declare an act of Congress void if it goes against the Constitution. This case took place because President John Adams had appointed William Marbury as justice of the peace in the District of Columbia, and the new president, Thomas Jefferson, did not agree with this decision. William Marbury was not appointed by the normal regulation, which was that the Secretary of State, James Madison, needed to make a notice of the appointment. James Madison did not follow through and make a notice of Marbury’s appointment; therefore, he sued James Madison, which was where the Supreme Court came in place.

Read More

More about Summary Of James Mcculloch V. State Of Maryland

Related Topics

Open Document