Tola APGOPO 10/9/12 Exemplar Large Republic: Best Control of Effects of Factions Federalist 10 Summary: In Federalist 10, James Madison or Publius asserts that the Constitution establishes a government capable of controlling the violence and damage caused by factions. He states that Antifederalist complain that the government is too unstable, claim rival parties disregard the public good, and that decisions are made by the majority rather than by justice and the rights of the minority. Madison goes on to define a faction as a group of citizens, either a majority or minority, whose actions are motivated by a passion or interest that hurts the rights of other citizens or goes against the best interests of the …show more content…
Madison argues that there are only two ways of controlling factions: by removing its causes or controlling its effects. In addition, there are two methods of removing the causes of factions: destroying liberties or giving every citizen the same passions and interests. The framers established a representative form of government, a government in which the many elect the few who govern. Direct democracies cannot control factious conflicts because the majority faction dominates, and there is no way to protect minority factions against the actions of a strong majority. Direct democracies cannot effectively protect personal and property rights and have always been characterized by …show more content…
Hamilton notes that the president is elected to four-year terms as long as the people deem him worthy, whereas, Great Britain’s king who inherits the crown. The President can be impeached, tried, and, on conviction of treason, bribery, or other high crimes or misdemeanors, removed from office. Afterwards, he would be liable to prosecution and punishment in the ordinary course of law. Great Britain’s king on the other had is inviolable. The President only has a qualified negative on congressional legislation—his veto can be overturned by a vote of 2/3rds of both houses—whereas the king has absolute negative on both Parliamentary houses. Both the president and the king serve as commander-and-chief of their armed forces; however, the king also has the power to raise and maintain the army—powers granted to the American legislature only. The President can only make treaties with the approval of 2/3 of the Senate; the king can make binding treaties whenever he