More handpicked essays just for you.
Benefits of animal research and testing
Benefits and drawbacks of animal testing
Benefits and drawbacks of animal testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Benefits of animal research and testing
Imagine sailing across the ocean to a land that is rumored to have savages that will kill you and eat you. Then have diseases that you have no chance of fighting. At the age of 11. Samuel Coliler is an orphan and he is also a fast leaner and pick up skills very quickly. He has no friends and a short temper.
The controversy within animal testing has continued to grow splitting the activists from the scientists. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services referred to these supporters as not activists but “terrorists” for hindering their research opportunities (13) Freelance writer, David Masci, attempts to address
Critics have claimed that the results from an animal cannot generalize over to people, and while this can be true, assumptions about human behavior based on animal research takes into consideration data from descriptive as well as experimental studies with people. The second objection to animal research is that it has no practical value as the research only provides facts that are only useful to a theoretician. While this might sometimes be the case the findings from animal research have been able to be put to good use in topics such as child rearing, sports, and education. Lastly, many critics are quick to say that animal research is unethical as people have no more right to experiment on animals as animals have to experiment on people. While there are ethical concerns that should be taken seriously these concerns beg the question of if it is unethical to use animals in research what about eating them, what about forcing them to be our pets or what about using animals on
They assert that it is the best way to save a lot of people's lives by using relatively small numbers of animals. Trull says that the success of animal testing has led to safe treatments for human. Admittedly, this is certainly true about some animal testing. However, in the USA, more than 100,000 people died due to the drugs that were successfully passed by animal testing. This fact shows that even though the drugs have been developed and tested successfully on animals, they are not 100 percent safe.
https://www.crueltyfreeinternational.org/why-we-do-it/arguments-against-animal-testing Balls, Michael. "Time to Reform Toxic Tests. " New Scientist 134 (1992):31-33.
In “Animal Testing is Bad Science” states that “The Federal Drug Administration has noted that 92 percent of all drugs that are shown to be safe and effective in animal test fail in human trials because they don’t work or are dangerous.” This shows that doing experiments on animals are unreliable and do not always have the same effect on humans. In addition, animal experimentation is unethical and unreliable and it puts the animals in
Due to the amount of antibiotics being used by both humans and animals we might become immune to them sooner than one might think. This is one reason we must put regulations on the amount of antibiotics one uses for an animal or human. Factory farming is a farming system where they put all the animals either inside i cages or inside a factory where they are all cramped together waiting to be transported to the slaughter house in which they are killed. we must put regulations on the amount of antibiotics one uses for an animal or human. When we eat the meat that has been injected with hormones we might end up getting the hormones that were originally meant for the meat.
Introduction Animal testing is such a controversial topic, but people barely know all the details and facts behind it. Animal testing could be argued in positive and negative ways. There are a lot of things most people don’t know about animal testing. For example, over 100 million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned, and abused in US labs every year. And that is just in the US.
The three R(s) fuel the fire of the argument that alternatives should be used in place of animal testing. Kelly Overton, a renowned activist, claims in her article Stop Animal Testing that animal testing is an obsolete practice by comparing it to old telegrams and eight track tapes. There are many others like her that believe animal testing should be replaced with newer methods such as stem cell research. However, the ethical debate of using animals for testing pales in comparison to the ethical debate of using stem cells; more studies need to be conducted before stem cells can be fully utilized but it does have great potential. According to PLOS Biology, a renowned peer reviewed scientific journal, it is possible for alternatives to be used as a complementary resource with the research of toxicology but more research and time is needed before they can completely replace animal testing in most cases.
For example, studies in Australia who allow the same hormones to be used in beef cattle as the U.S., have found that because the place of injection of the implant is the region below the ear, which has significant muscle movement, causes the injection wound to enlarge and become irritated (“What Are the Animal Welfare Impacts of Using Hormone Growth Promotants in Beef Cattle?” 5). Furthermore, hormonal implants interact with the cattle’s natural hormones and side effects of their use may include aggressiveness, difficulty in handling, nervousness, rectal prolapse, swelling, elevated tail heads and there has been evidence found of chronic stress conditions(“What Are the Animal Welfare Impacts of Using Hormone Growth Promotants in Beef Cattle?” 6). To sum up, the hormones negative effects on cattle should also be considered in reasons why they should be banned. Advocates of the use of growth hormones in beef cattle often argue that the hormones are completely safe because the FDA has done extensive testing to ensure that there would be no harmful effects on consumers. However, as previously stated, the EU has banned the purchase of any meat from the U.S. containing growth hormones due to their studies linking the hormones to cancer.
Many have concerns about future birth defects due to genetically modified foods. Information from many of the experiments give reasons to fear harmful side-effects, such as the test of Roundup Ready’s soy product when given to mice before conception. Over “56% died within three weeks compared to 9% from non-GM soy controls”(Smith). Additionally, the researchers tested two mice who were both fed genetically modified food trying to conceive and were unable to. The main ideas for the Ital diet is to “eat natural foods that are good for you”(Myers).
This article is relevant to my project because the author’s main purpose was to show how irrelevant animal testing are due to the impending failure rates. It does briefly talk about
Animals in Research and Testing According to PETA, the animals who are in research and testing “shake and cower in fear whenever someone walks past their cages and their blood pressure spikes drastically. After enduring lives of pain, loneliness and terror, almost all of them will be killed,” (“Animal Testing 101”). Animal-testing is the use of non-human animals in research and development projects, especially for purposes of determining the safety of substances, such as foods, beauty products, and/or drugs. Although animal research plays a crucial role in experiments focused on disease treatments and preventions, it is cruel, inhumane, and should be stopped. This is an act that should be banned and prohibited in all states and countries
I’m here today to talk about a controversial issue that has been around for a period of time, animal testing. Animal testing using animals in experiments with different chemical substances in everything from medical to cosmetic to determine their safety as well as effectiveness . It’s a problem that has existed since the 3rd and 4th centuries BCE with its merciless methods and painful ways of abusing animals for human demands, but now it’s time for it to stop. Our technology has developed significantly since; therefore, such medieval methods of torturing animals are no longer necessary. Researches have shown that each year, over 100 million animals are tortured and killed in American laboratories alone, including dogs, cats and more; this shows how far out of hand animal testing have gotten.
That is not a justified answer, it is NOT okay to watch as thousands of animals get mutated by lab tests and then have to be destroyed because they are now labeled as "chemical waste". These are living beings with hearts that beat just like our own. Sadly, not everyone cares for the lives of these creatures and many of these monstrous acts continue every day. There are organizations such as PETA that do their best to shut down animal testing facilities and laboratories.
