ipl-logo

Summary Of Memorial To The Cherokee Nation By John Ross

487 Words2 Pages

Tasha Heath
American history
4/4/2015
Memorial to the Cherokee Nation Response Paper five

When John Ross, Principal Chief of the Cherokee Nation, went with a delegation to Washington in January 1829 to resolve clashes with the state of Georgia over bonder lines of their homes in which George had wanted them to leave. Rather than lead the passing into useless discussions with President Jackson, Ross wrote an immediate memorial to Congress, completely forgoing the customary mail and requests to the Commander in Chief. . (Tindall & Shi)
In that letter he first starts off talking about how the white people would believe the move west would be better for their people. The Cherokee people believe that instead of it being good for them, it would …show more content…

They do not have any idea what’s out there. What little they do know is there not as much game, water or trees. Which to them are very important to them and there live. They need water to drink game to eat and wood to make their homes with. (“Memorial to the Cherokee Nation Response”)
They been called many harsh names which was very wrong to say. They are not rich people by far or smart. But, they never said they were. However they know they have a right to live on the lands of their fathers and even that right was back by American law. So why is it not also for them? It was a good try, it could have even got a few of their supporters but it did not stop anything. (“Memorial to the Cherokee Nation Response”) But not everyone agreed that the trips should losses their lands. The Cherokee Nation had many supporters such as senators Henry Clay, Theodore Frelinghuysen, and Daniel Webster, as well as Representatives Ambrose Spencer and David (Davy) Crockett. But even with those supporters it did not much good because. In 1830, Congress supported President Jackson Indian Removal Act of 1830, which said that "no state could achieve proper culture, civilization, and progress, as long as Indians remained within its boundaries". This act gave the president power to negotiate removal treaties with Indian tribes living east of Mississippi. Under these treaties, the Indians were to give up their properties east of the Mississippi River in interchange for the properties to the west. . (Tindall &

Show More
Related
661 Words | 3 Pages

Do you like getting kicked out after working hard and establishing a great community. On May 28, 1830 Andrew Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act. This act states that all the indians will have to move from their land that they had first into unknown land that is supposedly a huge hunk of the Louisiana just for them with fertile soil and a water source. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was terrible and unjustified; indians had already build up an amazing society, they were there first, and the americans have already messed with the indians. For starters, the Indians have built up a respectable town.

Read More
286 Words | 2 Pages

Jackson presidency was marked as a new era in Indian-Anglo American relations by imitating a policy of Indian removal. Before the removal, he made about 70 treaties with Native American tribes both in the South and the Northwest. His First Annual Message to Congress and some others begins in December of 1829, which contained remarks on the present and future state of American Indians in the United States. He argued that it was for the Indians own well, that they should be resettled on the vacant lands west of the Mississippi River. During the time in Congress, debates on a bill didn’t begin until late February 1830.

Read More
882 Words | 4 Pages

History 1301 Victoria Bergt John Ehle’s book Trail of Tears: The Rise and Fall of the Cherokee Nation [New York: Anchor Books, 1988] attempts to answer the entail question “Why did the Cherokees move?” He sketches the events and people who led to the legendary Trail of Tears, the removal of the Cherokee Nation to “Indian Territory” where they would “never” be bothered by the whites in their live again Trial of Tears: The Rise and Fall of the Cherokee Nation has 22 chapters, beginning with some backgrounds of the Cherokees and the birthplace of the Cherokee Nation, also the birth of the Cherokee leader, Ridge. Ehle teaches us the traditional rituals the Cherokees do in the first couple of chapters and ending with

Read More
846 Words | 4 Pages

President Jackson didn’t treat the CHerokee Indians with respect at all. In the U.S. Constitution it states that the CHerokee Indians were there first and they own the land that they took their territory. President JAckson said,” The sooner you do this, the sooner you will commence your career of improvement and prosperity. ”(Doherty and Jaffe) Meaning that the sooner the Cherokee Indians moved west of the Mississippi River the sooner you will get our help moving.

Read More
759 Words | 4 Pages

The Indian Removal act of 1830 wasn’t acceptable, causing many conflicts which was a debate where the cherokee’s was allowed to stay in Georgia or not be able to stay because the Americans wanted to expand, but the indians owned the land first, the americans also cheated the indians in trades and broken treaties, finally barely any of the cherokees aided the treaty to move into the new land. So, the Indians should stay. The indians should stay because they owned the

Read More
530 Words | 3 Pages

The air is heavy with the smell of gunpowder. All across the horizon is littered with bodies. The cries of children can be heard, piercing through the fog. All the carnage, this sadness carried through the breeze. This could all be stopped with one thing.

Read More
1744 Words | 7 Pages

Early in Jacksons administration he passed the Indian Removal Act (1830) which gave the government funding to remove the ‘Five Civilised Tribes’ which included the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek and Seminole Indians – a total of nearly 60,000. The act authorised the relocation of the tribes previously situated to the east of the Mississippi river to the west. The act didn’t allow the forced removal of the tribes but it allowed Jackson to negotiate with the tribes for their land which he did and led to their removal. This was made worse as the tribes unlike the other Indian tribes had done all they could to integrate into American society. For example, the Cherokee tribe created their own written language which set a precedent for Indians, they established education for their children, and even created a constitution which they had to adhere to.

Read More
684 Words | 3 Pages

A Shameful Part of American History The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was America’s first attempt to legally remove Native Americans from their land. This primary source was created by the Senate and House of Representatives, and it was backed by President Andrew Jackson. Passed on May 28th, the act allowed the for the relocation of Natives west of the Mississippi River. This order was a result of Manifest Destiny which was the belief that it was the United State’s God-given right to expand westward.

Read More
681 Words | 3 Pages

In 1828, Georgia passed a string of laws that violated the rights of the Cherokee people. One of the law passed by the state of Georgia also allowed the removal of the Cherokee from their own land After the settlers that were after the natives land had been burn and destroying houses and towns, and trespassing among other things, with the support of the state government the Cherokee’s brought a case to the supreme court. The treaties negotiated between Georgia and the Cherokee were negotiated as the Cherokee as an Independent Nation, this guaranteed the independence of both the land and the people of the Cherokee Nations. Cherokee tried negotiating with congress and Andrew Jackson, both of which failed. The Cherokee Nation, represented by John Ross who was the principal chief of the Cherokee’s, then filed for an Injunction at the Supreme Court against Georgia repeal the unfair laws.

Read More
1497 Words | 6 Pages

Was the Indian Removal Act Justified? “Any law which violates the inalienable rights of man is essentially unjust and tyrannical; it is not a law at all” (Maximilien Robespierre). The Indian Removal Act of 1830 authorized negotiation between the United States of America and the Five Civilized Tribes in the southeast for the acquisition of their lands. Andrew Jackson signed it in to gain territory for agriculture as well as to appease Georgia, as tensions are high between the state and the Cherokee.

Read More
778 Words | 4 Pages

Whitmire states that white settlers came to, “the Indian's homes, drove off their cattle, horses, and pigs, and they even rifled the graves for any jewelry, or other ornaments that might have been buried with the dead” (Whitmire). Whitmire shows how the Cherokees were oppressed by the fact that not only were the white settlers forcing them to leave their homes, but that they also destroyed their ancestors burial sites for their riches which was both disrespectful as well as mortifying for their family

Read More
825 Words | 4 Pages

Reading Analysis Essay In the journal, Mobilizing Women, Anticipating Abolition: The Struggle Against Indian Removal in the 1830s, the author Mary Hershberger describes the unprecedented acts of benevolent women participating in abolishment of the removal of Indians introduced by President Andrew Jackson. The Indian Removal Act was signed into law in 1830 coercing Cherokee Indians to move beyond of the Mississippi River. The failure of the attempt of abolishing the removal of the Indians, the experience gave way to the support of other campaigns. President Jackson wholeheartedly favored the removal of the Cherokees west of the Mississippi.

Read More
760 Words | 4 Pages

Jack Andrews said that, “the people of Georgia will eventually take the Cherokee land by force.” This is true because the Georgians want their land so bad, that they’re willing to kill for it. It’s a lose-lose situation for both sides, because of the many people that will die, so it makes sense for the Cherokee to move so that they can prevent that lost. Thus, if the Cherokee just move to the land set out for them in the west, it would eliminate the chance of ANY civil

Read More
402 Words | 2 Pages

In the letter, the Cherokee nation addresses several reason on why they should not have to move. One reason is that the new land if foreign to them. They are being expected to pack up, leave everything they know, and move to the unknown. Another reason to add on to the above is that there are other Native American tribe already

Read More
1027 Words | 5 Pages

Ranging from the south Alleghenies mountain range all the way down to the south of Georgia and far west of Alabama, lived the Cherokee Indians. They were a powerful detached tribe of the Iroquoian family and were commonly called Tsaragi which translates into "cave people. " This tribe was very prominent in what is now called the U.S, but over time has been split up or run out of their land because of social or political encounters with the new settlers from Europe. Despite the dispersion or the split amongst this tribe, they still obtained their core religious beliefs, practices and ceremonies. Their detailed belief system, fundamental beliefs, significant meanings, and their connection to song and dance make up their religious system.

Read More

More about Summary Of Memorial To The Cherokee Nation By John Ross

Related Topics

Open Document