Summary Of Rules For Radicals By Saul Alinsky

With a title like Rules for Radicals: A Practical Primer for Realistic Radicals and a reputation of controversial teachings, it can be difficult to read the works of Saul Alinsky with an open mind. Having read the entire book before, I will say that there are some valid points within his writing, but the term “Community organizing” might not an accurate description of how aggressive and warlike some of the tactics are. Though Alinsky is often associated with socialism or leftist views, he always refused to categorize himself politically. Rules for Radicals is Alinsky’s guide to conquer any argument, regardless of political or social standing. The organization CHUM, which appears to use domesticated versions of Alinsky’s methods, has experienced

In my opinion, this is the strongest section of the book and shows the possibility for a much more constructive side of peacekeeping and community organizing than the argumentative and antagonistic tactics. Using the Civil Rights movement was an especially good example of ethics in social change. Advocates of Civil Rights did not lash out violently against the opposition, as that response would only breed further violence. With a movement dedicated to fairness and morality, it would be highly detrimental to employ tactics based in violence, a generally immoral activity. Additionally, Alinsky addresses the constant confusion between means and ends. “Means and ends are so qualitatively interrelated that the true question has never been the proverbial one, "Does the End justify the Means?" but always has been "Does this particular end justify this particular means?” (Alinsky 1971, 47). This brings up an important point that those desiring change often get caught up thinking about the big picture instead of carefully examining each action taken, no matter how small, and predicting the effects of its success or failure. It is obvious that Alinsky is well-versed in ethical philosophies and unfortunately it seems he has chosen a Nihilistic view on morality. In terms of achieving one’s goals, this is probably among the most effective views. However, its sociopathic disregard for others and the effects of one’s actions makes it inefficient for the modern