Saul Alinsky Essays

Primer for Realistic Radicals and a reputation of controversial teachings, it can be difficult to read the works of Saul Alinsky with an open mind. Having read the entire book before, I will say that there are some valid points within his writing, but the term “Community organizing” might not an accurate description of how aggressive and warlike some of the tactics are. Though Alinsky is often associated with socialism or leftist views, he always refused to categorize himself politically. Rules for

Jamila Day Dr. Horton, Business Ethics 4083 27 March 2023 Alinsky Paper Saul Alinsky was a community organizer and author of the book "Rules for Radicals." The book outlines his approach to social and political activism through a set of thirteen rules. Altogether, the rules emphasize the importance of building power and organizing people around specific issues. While these rules may be controversial and not universally accepted, they have been influential in the field of community organizing and

Community organizing doesn’t seem like an accessible task to undertake, but Saul Alinsky made his movements seem effortless and possible for the common person to initiate. One of his tactics that I truly admired was his ability to blend in with the crowd. Alinsky grew up in the an underprivileged neighborhood and was fortunate to finish his graduate degree in criminal justice. All his graduate research was valuable, but his real education came from his work with the mob in the streets known as “back

Interpretations After watching this video on YouTube, some kind of energy came to me. I gained a lot of knowledge about what community organizing is. I saw how willing Saul Alinsky wanted to change community organization at all cost by trying to “restore American democracy through a collective shared public participation in civil life” (ITVS, 2012). He brings in some positivity and determination and on the video, known as a good organizer. I feel that if anyone of us has that drive of accomplishing

Of Means and Ends Assignment In Saul Alinsky’s Of Means and Ends, he expounds upon a list of rules regarding the ethics of means and ends. He furthers his notions that are expressed in his writing through the interview entitled “I’d Organize Hell”. Throughout his writing and speaking appearances, there are several points that can be considered disturbing, appalling or disgraceful. One of these point comes from the latter section of the text. The quote reads, “There can be no such thing as a successful

Chapter three in Jesus and Nonviolence compares and contrasts Saul Alinsky’s principles to the nonviolent teachings of Jesus. I thought his first point, that power is not only what you have but also what your enemy thinks you have, to be an interesting point. I was wondering if this point, however, is suggesting you deceive the enemy? I do not think that being deceptive is the right answer. Alinsky also teaches to never adopt a strategy that you would not want your opponents to use against you (Pg

Casey. “Strike one,” the umpire said.” Another similarity between Casey and David is that they both listen to people with a positive or negative opinion on them. In “David and Goliath”, the text shows this, “You don’t have a chance against him,” Saul replied. “You’re only a boy and he’s been a soldier all his life.” In “Casey at the Bat”, the text shows “five thousand tongues applauded when he wiped them on his shirt.” They back up the explanation that was found.

Knowing that you are meant to be King but also having to go through rough times before it happens was a way of teaching David to humble himself before God. God was trying to prepare him so he would be a good ruler and not follow in the footstep of the Saul. It led to people respecting David and it also lead to David teaching others how to do the right thing. 2. What’s in David’s past and history that prepares him to ascend to the throne? A: David is not a person that people would expect to be called

about Saul and God. In this text of the Bible, it is talking about an evil spirit from the Lord came over Saul. I thought to myself, the Lord would not do this. Then I realized, it says so in His Word, it must be true. My next question, why would He do this? First, I searched Biblegateway.com for some commentary information, it was just so, so. Instead, I pulled out my new MacArthur Bible Commentary to see what this all means. There in black and white was my answer. Earlier in chapter 15, Saul disobeyed

1 Samuel closes with the collapse of Saul’s kingship following the death of Saul and his sons. 2 Samuel opens with David hearing the news of the death of Saul. The scene is thus set for David to fill the leadership vacuum left behind by Saul. The rise of David as king and the inauguration of the Davidic dynasty have both political and spiritual implications. The biblical narrative here chronicles the establishment of David’s reign, the expansion of David’s reign and the evil during David’s reign

King David, born a shepherd boy near the kingdom of Judea he lead a simple life. Although not much is known about his childhood he is known to be the teen who killed goliath with only a sling and a stone. Therefore saving Judea from coming into Egyptian rule, a deal made from both generals of the army's. He there was commended and made the new king of Judea. Using his new power David made a big impact on jewish culture in various ways. Like once he was king he defended Judea well, became a prophet

2 Samuel 11:26-12:25 is essentially the story about the sin of David, this story is so important because it shows that even the mightiest can fall. This story is also important because it demonstrates that God would punish even his chosen people if they went against what they said. It is difficult to imagine that David would sin, he appeared to be what most people would strive to be. He was the singer of psalms and an anointed king; David brought a glimpse of hope to Israel. The fall of David shows

One of the truly remarkable men in the Old Testament is David, or at least some describe him in such a way. He is said to be “a man after God’s own heart.” Yet, this does not exclude him from having substantial faults. David’s relationship with Bathsheba shows that a man loved by God can still fall off his high pedestal. The adulterous relationship held between Bathsheba and David is meaningful as well as problematic. During springtime, the Israelites went to battle in order to take hold of Rabbah

As the audience digs deeper and deeper into this fascinating journey to the past before christ or before the common era, the readers of Matthew begin to realize the significant changes and similarities in terms of leadership and values of the many high priests and the king of that time. After reading from the time of Onias III to Herod, the reader can already tell what kind of changes happened to the usual idea of a “high priest” and “king.” The good natured high priest is longer looked at the same

focuses on God’s ultimate plan for Israel and the future of the entire nation through the rising of a Godly leader. There are three main characters that the story focuses on: David, Goliath, and Saul. David, a little shepherd boy, is the youngest of eight brothers, three of whom had followed Saul into battle. Saul is the king of Israel but is losing his political status and popularity

In 2 Samuel 9-20 David had many fascinating and diabolical traits, he showed forgiveness, kindness, recognition of some of his sin and mourns just like everyone else. He also knew how to command and lead effectively which helped him, however also assisted with his malicious acts. David had to have whatever he wanted no matter what the cost; even though he knew, God was going to punish him for his actions. Bathsheba was described in the scriptures right away as being very beautiful. In addition

find someone to fight against Goliath. David was a shepherd, not a fighter or soldier, but he had God on his side and he knew it. David definately was not an introvert. While the older experienced and trained soldiers backed out David took stand. King Saul questioned David but later gave him his armor. David realizes he does not like the armor and rejects it. Refusing the armor shows that David trusts in God. The tenacity of david shows his faith in God. As 1 Samuel

This second leading theme could be the same leading theme that stood out as well in the book of Kings. The theme of obedience and disobedience can be seen starting from the ruling of David as King of Israel. The moment like the times when David asked God to defeat the Philistines (1 Chronicles 14:8-17) and chose to obey what God told him and resulted in blessings to David and the people. In fact, all the events that the author recorded concerning David in the book indicate that the reason why David

peoples will, he was the first to appoint a king. As for a king maker, Samuel was know to be a divine psychic and he knew instantly that Saul was to be their first king. Under the power and authority of God, Samuel could “anoint” Saul as king (Tullock, & McEntire, 2012). Samuel was also a king breaker as he could rebuke a king for disobeying the word of God. When Saul did not wait long enough for Samuel while his

place dwell forever (2 Samuel 7:10-11), that David’s son would build the temple (2 Samuel 7:12-13), that He would maintain His relationship David’s descendants (2 Samuel 7:14), and that He would not depart from David or his descendants as he had from Saul (2 Samuel 7:14-15). The remarkable promises God made to David are fulfilled in an even more amazing way: through the person and work of Jesus Christ and the establishment of His kingdom on earth! Although David did not know Jesus, his heart was indeed