More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of common core state standards
The importance of common core state standards
Impact of common core standards
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of common core state standards
One of the biggest concerning the need for an increase in rigor in instruction in American schools. She discusses that in Poland students must stay in academic classes for an extra year and teachers are paid bonuses to engage in professional development work. She also notes that in Finland they “rebooted their teacher-training colleges, forcing them to become much more selective and rigorous.” In an article written by Sarah Tantillio on Only Good Books, she recognizes the validity of these statements, but comments that in America “the Common Core States Standards, which most states have adopted, they are definitely rigorous, But how they are implemented (and assessed) from state to state and school to school is still a Very Big Question.” Further in her article she points out the large population differences between Finland, Poland, and the United States, and how this affects our education system.
In the article, “Quarrel over Common Core: A Pennsylvania Primer” by Randy Kraft (2014), Common Core and the controversy surrounding it are discussed heavily. Kraft’s thesis is to inform the audience about Common Core and explain, impartially, the arguments for and against it. In 2010, Pennsylvania took on the Common Core Standards. These standards were put in place to ensure that students of Pennsylvania were on the same academic level by graduation, and enable them to be better equipped to compete in a global marketplace (p. 1).
Many school districts and teachers have openly stated they do not agree with the Common Core standards and wish they did not have to implement them, but to get the funding the school needs they do. With curriculum changes currently happening all around the country, wherever the reader is have heard about the upcoming changes and have formed their own opinion on it. This is the closest anyone could get to the Colorado situation without actually being there. Common Core is such a controversial topic that many people think over reaches the federal governments grasp on education (CBS, 2014, para. 22). The states hold the power of education, which is why, up until now in history, there have been no national standards.
The National Common Core Standards philosophy includes but is not limited to developing critical-thinking, problem solving, and analytical skills. The focus of the philosophy is to prepare students for the rigor of college. The Common Core Standards require educators to collaborate with each other in order to meet and exceed the standards. These standards reflect current philosophical trends in that educators have already started the collaboration process and relationship.
Explanation: This important because the backers of CCSS believe if that the general public could understand exactly what the standards are, there might be more support for them. Only seventeen percent of Americans who supported Common Core and the remainder was either confused or thought it was an umbrella for many topics other than education (Simon) This all connects back to my argument that the debate has spun out of control fueled by both sides, with the public stuck in the middle trying to grasp some understanding of CCSS. Analysis to compare of what is driving the resistance Politics, money, power
Sawchuk discusses the massive task of getting all the public school K-12 teachers ready for the standards. Professional development and the roles of the states and school districts are reviewed. This article is clearly demonstrates the amount of work it will involve to make the Common Core Standards a reality across the United States. Wilhoit, G. (2012). Make-or-break state action.
Furthermore the State Board of Education, now demands that the most difficult way is the solution. Situations like this exist. It is in our past and present, but it does not have to be our future. This convoluted way to find a solution is called Common Core, and we are putting it on trial. Since the moment of conception, it has poisoned the school system.
It was discovered that in education there were certain areas that were universal and common among learning. The two main subjects of concern were English language arts and mathematics. Common core is the new curriculum implemented now in school systems to develop learning. Common Core Standards are a clear set of shared goals and expectations for the knowledge and skills students need in English language arts and mathematics at each grade level so they can be prepared to succeed in college, career, and life. Although, Common Core seems to be here to stay this article addresses concerns in reference to content, instruction, and assessment.
In recent months, however, there has been a controversy swirling around the use of Common Core materials in conjunction with teaching to TEKS standards. Teachers in Texas have been provided materials aligned with Common Core standards to combined with TEKS teaching materials to students in districts around the state (Hope, 2015). This not only illustrates the evolution of Texas educational policy with regard to how stringent it has been about maintaining its own standards, but also it shows the reach of Common Core to date. Even in a state that is not necessarily subscribing to all of the Common Core principles – which has had its own controversy since its broad initiation into school systems around the country – there has still been something of an infiltration of Common Core. This somewhat usurps the TEKS system, despite its widespread popularity in
The state of Texas has been in a constant struggle within itself over just how to evaluate education, and standardized testing in Texas has been a major influencer in terms of the state’s standards for over thirty years. Though these methods of testing have been utilized for decades, resentment to the tests have been continuously rising among educators, parents, and students, but not everyone agrees. Despite government officials trying to quell these protests with changes to administration, and the way the test itself is formatted and formulated, there seems to have been little to no improvement made and those opposing the tests have started calling for an end to all standardized testing. For one to truly understand this ongoing struggle, one must first look at standardized testing’s beginning, then how government today is trying to fix the broken system, and finally consider the opinions of notable figures in the testing world.
The California Department of Education (CDE) 5th grade curriculum and Common Core State Standards (CCSS) are designed to outline what students should know and comprehend by the end of the 5th grade school year. Each discipline has a brief overview of what the fourth grader should know before entering the next grade level, along with a description of 5th grade standards for each discipline. The curriculum makes up nine sections that covers the content, communication style, ways to support struggling readers and support for English learners. All curriculums are updated and revised by the Department of Education to align with the standards and to provide guidance to educators, parents, and publishers. This formative evaluation is done to make
Why Common Core Standards Should Be More Common Why would students not want to be on a level playing field in their education? Why would they not want to be able to move seamlessly between states? These opportunities are given to students by Common Core. Although many opponents may say that these standards are a barrier of creativity, the Common Core Standards being accepted in all fifty states would help America, because it would have teachers across state borders instructing similar lesson plans, it would decrease the achievement gap, and it would better prepare students for college and the workforce by teaching them the needed materials for their futures.
The Common Core Standards were a set of guidelines provided by the federal government to help direct how the public schools taught their students. The Government did this in hopes that no students would be “left behind” in the school curriculum and that the national average for the test scores would increase. There was backlash from parents and teachers complaining that the Common Core was not preparing their children for anything past high school. These students would only be taught to recite facts that they have memorized on the excessive amount of tests. The Common core would force children to only use lower level thinking skills rather than learning a topic in depth and actually thinking past the factual level, ruining their chances at
Nevertheless, schools are facing hard times and taking the loss right where it hurts, the pocketbook. Many states signed up for the new curriculum within only two months, which was not nearly long enough to make sure that the new learning standard was fit for them. By signing up, these states agreed to buy tests and upgrade their technology to administer the tests. All of this added up to thirty dollars per student, more than what half the states can afford. “Common Core Causes Collateral Damage” reveals, “Just last month, Maryland announced it would need $100 million to get schools up to speed to administer the tests”(McShane, 2).
Recently, the Common Core State Standards were developed and kids were going to be tested more than ever. However, all of this education reform has been a failure because our testing scores have not improved, the testing makes children suffer, and it doesn’t improve how teachers teach. Education reforms has had little effect on our testing scores. The average score for a 17 year old student doing a reading test in the beginning of school is 285 and over 40
