ipl-logo

Summary Of The GMO Deception

755 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Controversies of gmos

The GMO Deception
A GMO is a genetically modified organism. A deception is the action of deceiving someone. This combined makes the book The GMO Deception. This book is written by more than forty different authors, scientifical activists against and for the uses of GMOs, biotech nets, and agricultural activists,etc. The use of this magnitude of authors made this book a lot more interesting to read because of all of the clashing ideas and ideas that built upon other ideas about GMOs. The GMO Deception was Edited by Sheldon Krimsky who is a Professor of Urban and Environmental Policy and Planning at Tufts University, and adjunct professor in the Department of Family Medicine and Community Health at Tufts University School of Medicine. It was …show more content…

John is the founder of the Global ID group. The Global ID group is a company founded by John Fagen. GIDG is a company that with Johns help now pioneers in the development of innovative tools to verify food purity,quality, and sustainability. He has a very strong opinion on people saying that GMOs are “the future” of agriculture. He says “The biggest myth of the all is that GMOs have swept the world and dominate agriculture as it is practiced today. The corollary of this myth is that if your country don 't accept GMOs it will be left behind.” This quote says over and over again the word myth. This quote shows me that he doesn 't believe that GMOs are “the future”. That is exactly what John does in the next paragraph. “On the surface these statistics sound impressive”.... “Despite gargantuan marketing and lobbying efforts costing billions of dollars”.... “GMOs have failed to penetrate the world agricultural market significantly.” He is saying that GMOs aren 't what they are being said to be. He is saying that we are being lied to. John utters that all GMOs are is a marketing schemes done by companies to drive in truck loads of money to these …show more content…

Bill Freese is a science policy analyst at the center for food safety. He contributed a chapter in The GMO Deception. Bill kind of supports John 's argument that GMOs being “ The future” is just a skyme from big corporations to make them more money. Bill says “Hype notwithstanding, their is not a single GM crop on the market engineered for increased yield, drought tolerance, salt tolerance, enhanced nutrition or other attractive sounding traits. Disease resistant GM crops are practically non existent” This teaches me that if scientists really have the power to make these GMOs then why not make them have more nutrients in them? Why don 't scientist make a crop that has a bunch of concentrated nutrients and send them to Africa where more than thirty percent of the population is starving. Why not use that a little bit of the billions of dollars that the companies make and send them to those that

Show More
Related
1559 Words | 7 Pages

In the spirit of full disclosure, I have to reveal that my family and all of my neighbors are row-crop farmers, and we raise both GMO corn and GMO soybeans. It is our attitude that we are stewards of the land and of our animals and we would not do anything to either one like Katherine Paul describes. So, I still agree with Caplan that we should be using GMOs to produce food such as Golden Rice that could save billions of people from going blind or

Read More
1576 Words | 7 Pages

Both essays share common themes, in mainly advocating for sustainability in the food and agriculture industry. However, the authors suggest different methods to obtain this. Can GMOs Be Sustainable, written by McKay Jenkins mainly discusses the usage of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) in the agriculture industry, and the controversy that surrounds them. The article is mainly through the point of view of farmer Jenny Schmidt, who discusses the positive effects of GMOs, and how they can help farmers. However, there are also perspectives given by different professionals, which all support the conversation of sustainability in the food industry.

Read More
268 Words | 2 Pages

Lang believe the three biggest issues around gmos are labeling, intellectual property, and consolidation in the food industry. Society is suspicious because we don't know who is producing the food. Intellectual property is a issue because majority of the information in a is copyrighted. Lang discuss how labeling is a huge issue because labels impact the profit and labeling can be misleading. Grocery stores assume people read certain labels and want to buy the products.

Read More
692 Words | 3 Pages

In the essay “Green monster” who do you believe is his intended audience and why? In “The Green Monster,” James McWilliams informs the reader about GMO (Genetically Modified Organisms) and the affects it has on animals, plants, farmers and our food. Through multiple illustrations of the affects of GMO, he contends that GMO has various potential consequences, which may in fact be more positive than detrimental to food sustainability. His intended audience seems to be food consumers but more specifically, those uninterested in or wary of products which are genetically modified.

Read More
1121 Words | 5 Pages

Support over the GMO company is questionable to say

Read More
346 Words | 2 Pages

Summary: Genetically modified organisms, or GMO’s were introduced in the nineties. Now GMO’s are planted on a half billion acres of land. Before GMO’s, farmers saved their seeds, which increased genetic diversity. Farming is now rules by a company called Monsanto, which created agent orange. In the late twentieth century they turned over to GMO’s.

Read More
799 Words | 4 Pages

“Today in the United States, by the simple acts of feeding ourselves, we are unwittingly participating in the largest experiment ever conducted on human beings.” Jeremy Seifert certainly knows how to get viewers’ attention, as exemplified by the film blurb describing his 2013 documentary, GMO OMG. The frightening depiction of the food industry is one of many efforts to expose consumers of the twenty-first century to the powerful organizations that profit from national ignorance and lack of critical inquiry and involvement. Seifert effectively harnesses the elements of rhetoric throughout his phenomenal argument against remaining complacent about the food industry’s act of withholding of information about genetically modified organisms from

Read More
588 Words | 3 Pages

Furthermore, she enlightens her readers by revealing “Many other countries require labeling and some countries have banned all GM foods” (Mathers 43). This triggers the readers to question whether GMOs are as safe as they claim. In a logical aspect, why would other places around the world enforce stricter regulations on GMOs if they are insignificantly different than organic foods. By notifying her audience how other nations distinguish GMOs, she effectively forces her readers to interrogate how innocent are GM

Read More
1628 Words | 7 Pages

Monsanto's CEO Hugh Grant went on "CBS This Morning" earlier today to discuss all the concerns people have about the corporations practices and products. This article will discuss all the talking points of that interview and his responses. The first talking point was the Safety of GMO crops, to which Grant used the standard Monsanto misinformation for is answer: GMOs are one of the most studied product in the world. The reason I categorize this as misinformation instead of disinformation is because it is not an outright lie; there are indeed a lot of studies on GMOs, the majority showing GMOs are safe.

Read More
598 Words | 3 Pages

The proposed goal of GMOs is to increase food production. This will supposedly in turn lower food costs, and make it easier to distribute food to feed poor populations around the world. However research shows that global food production has increased enough to, “feed 10 billion people”, one and a half times more than what we need to feed every single person on Earth (The Huffington Post). And yet with this charming initiative having been accomplished, there are still groups of people going hungry everyday. This is not to say that companies like Monsanto are to blame for leaving people hungry or in poverty, but it questions if their goals are based on true concern.

Read More
1096 Words | 5 Pages

GMOs are considered to be the next agricultural “innovation” as some would say, but this is incorrect. They think that GMOs are a way to feed everyone on earth. Giving them the nutrients that they need to grow in conditions that most plants can’t live in, while not causing harm to physical and environmental health. They are wrong. GMOs do more harm than good.

Read More
787 Words | 4 Pages

As mankind evolves so does our technology. With breakthrough discoveries in the field of science we no longer have to worry about problems our ancestors faced. Many of these breakthroughs have a positive effect on the world, however some seem to still be in the developing stages. In the discussion of GMO’s, the government of Peru believes that science has not yet researched GMO’s long term safety and effects to the extent of instituting it as a common food source throughout the world. . It is not yet clear whether the benefits of GMO’s outweigh the possible risks, and this is not a chance the Peruvian government will take.

Read More
1048 Words | 5 Pages

Genetically modified crops also aim to lower the failure of crops, which can maximize the benefits of farmer through the increase of income from selling crops. Nevertheless, this technology created chances for biotech companies to exploit farmers, even causing farmers to commit suicide. Big companies developed the genetically modified seed, and sell it to farmers. But farmers have little bargaining power only, they can only rely on the biotech companies. These companies do not aim to help farmers to increase their income, but aim to maximize their own profit.

Read More
700 Words | 3 Pages

GMOS Introduction: I believe that GMOS are good for this world and for the people because the gmos can save us from starving when all the food is gone. GMOS are a genetically modified organism is an organism whose genetic materials that have been altered using genetic engineering techniques. GMO foods are okay to eat because some food that have gmos could have some genetic characteristics in them to make the food survive the hot when that food has to be frozen. GMOS are different from foods that don 't have GMOS Body 1: GMOS can save the world because if we had no food because if there was a drought and the plants died. Then we could just plant GMO foods, The drought won’t really do anything to the plant.

Read More
966 Words | 4 Pages

It’s a popular topic on the media that GMOs are bad for the human body. Well, little did the they know that ninety percent of corn grown in the US is genetically modified (Margie Kelly), and the body can 't even distinguish between GMOs and non-GMOs! There are people debating that GMOs are unhealthy, bad for the economy and even the environment. These people must be uneducated on this topic. Genetically modified crops improve our society because they allow farmers to yield a larger crop, improve the quality their crop, and lessen the negative environmental impacts of their crops.

Read More

More about Summary Of The GMO Deception

Related Topics

Open Document