I Agree with the assessment that NRTW put forth because in the Article by Chris Brooks,” Why Did Nissan Workers Vote No” in Labor notes August 11,2017 issue talks about how Nissan brought more to the table then the union (UAW). Also in the Wal-Mart anti -union video- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_VL4gqrCHc, the employers and employees decided to continue to be pro associates and not allow a union to change anything in the Wal-Mart business. In the article by Chris Brooks “Why Did Nissan Workers Vote No “felt unions were very outdated and wouldn’t be beneficial to their team. Nissan brought well paid jobs to an area with very few. Nissan employees took home high blue collar wages; they also became permanent workers through the …show more content…
Employees were happy because Nissan plant gave them a better life. The union UAW couldn’t top Nissan offers they were giving to their team. Workers were scared of losing everything they gain while working for Nissan. In the article by Chris brooks “why did Nissan workers vote no” demonstrated with three bags stating: one bag said ‘Nissan’ and another said ‘employee’ and another said ‘union.’ workers said that Nissan comes to the table with everything in their bag, and employees come and get some from the Nissan bag. The union comes empty and has to fill up its bag from the employee bag. This message indicates the union needed information from the employees in order to collectively bargain, but no one would give the union inside information, leaking anything would cause a major shut down with the plant. The employees had too much to lose, to sign their new life away. Another anti-union company that did not want their employees to pay union dues was Wal- Mart. Wal-Mart is a great job and is the only retail store that offers great benefits to their