ipl-logo

Summary: The Gun Debate

436 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Mental health and gun violence essay

The Gun Debate The second Amendment guarantees that “A well-regulated Militia,being necessary to the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” In the article, “The Gun Debate” it states that President Obama thinks the gun laws do not need to be increased. This is what he says, “No single law, no set of laws can eliminate evil from the world or prevent every senseless act of violence in our society.” I believe that this is true because, murder is already illegal, so there is no point in making more laws for the people that chose not to pay attention to them. In the article it also says that most killers are dealing with mental problems or illnesses. A gun range owner, Scott Ostrosky says, “A gun did not kill those children. A …show more content…

The evidence to support this point of view is clear. One example is that after Chicago raised their laws and made gun control stricter, the crime only went up. In the year of 2014 when they allowed people to have guns, the amount of crimes went down. This proves that we don’t need more gun laws, they only increase crime rate. Most likely because people don’t feel safe from the people who don’t follow the rules, when their gun is taken away. This also happened in Australia, once the gun laws were raised crime went up to 26% but after they got rid of the laws, the crime rate went to 21%. Another reason we should not make stricter gun laws is because, taking away our gun rights is like going against our second Amendment, after that, people will start the think we can go against the other Amendments. Next thing you know we will not be able to believe, say, do, or think what we want. One more reason more gun control laws won 't affect anything, is because there are so many other weapons that can be used to harm others. Now people can make a working gun using a 3D printer. These reasons prove that having stricter gun laws won’t stop bad

Show More
Related
1242 Words | 5 Pages

Attention Getter: Between 1993 and 2003 gun ownership increased by 56 percent, and yet gun violence declined by almost 50 percent (Bandler). Criminals know that if people have guns to protect themselves then they might not be successful in a shooting. Gun Regulation is immoral because Guns are not what kill people. It is the people who use the guns to kill people, who kill people. Many of these people who cause these mass shooting and killings have mental health issues.

Read More
930 Words | 4 Pages

Strict regulations and limitations have been pursued already and clearly do not suffice. Statics brought to attention by gun control opponents, show that gun control laws have done little to reduce crime rates. Several restrictions have been made on certain guns, considered as overly dangerous, though in the hands of an unstable criminal even a legal hunting gun can be deadly. Countless restrictions have been made, however people have still found ways around them. If people are unstable and determined enough, they will find a gun, regardless of the restrictions or regulations.

Read More
210 Words | 1 Pages

Why take away the protection and recreational shooting practices of innocent citizens because others are irresponsible? Gun control laws are a major issue being discussed in the U.S. right now. Some believe that by condemning the availability of firearms to all, criminals and people with mental illnesses will be less likely to attain firearms. However they are then violating the people’s second amendment right, which give them the right to bear arms. According to the article on “Gun Control Laws” from the Issues and Controversies database, It all started on “June 12, 2016, when a gunman killed 49 at a gay nightclub in Orlando Florida.”

Read More
270 Words | 2 Pages

Making it to where people can’t have gun honestly makes them want them even more. For instance when a mother tells a child then can’t do something that makes them want to do it even more than before, so therefore why do they think making laws about guns will make the crime go down. Honestly

Read More
1710 Words | 7 Pages

Recent events would say that the government needs to have these stricter gun laws in order to protect the public. However, critics believe this would only put the public in more danger. Putting stricter laws on guns would only prevent innocent civilians from obtaining fire arms, not the criminals. For instance, America has outlawed the use of drugs, but yet drug issues are still a problem today. Criminals will still be able to access guns, and banning them would only prevent people from protecting themselves from these criminals.

Read More
1700 Words | 7 Pages

In the past, the major gun control legislations that have been put into effect have not stopped people from obtaining firearms (Gun Control.) There have also been cases in the past where cities have attempted to ban handguns. After the ban was put into effect, murder rates tended to rise instead of drop, unlike what most people might assume. Crime rates and violence also skyrocketed after the bans were put into effect. Another problem with taking guns away, or banning them, is that the government cannot expect everyone to abide by the laws.

Read More
700 Words | 3 Pages

Did you know that the US is third in the world in murders? If you don’t count Chicago, New Orleans, Detroit, St. Louis, and Washington D.C. then the US would be 189th out of 193 countries. However, all five of those cities have very strict gun control laws. You may think that gun control helps, but it really doesn't. A study shows that in the past as more people owned guns, the crime rate has gone down.

Read More
707 Words | 3 Pages

Gun laws give too much power to the government and way less from the people, which will lead to government corruption. And, stated by ClearPictureOnline.com,”Guns don 't kill people, people do. We need to concentrate on the values and morals of our citizens and at the role the media plays in glorifying violence and the lack of respect for law.” (Shootout: Do We Need More Gun Control Regulations?) What people don 't understand is that they are taking away their own freedoms with Gun Control.

Read More
1898 Words | 8 Pages

Such regulations cannot put a stop to tragedies because they are themselves tragic. Gun control cannot kill violence because it will serve to spread violence. This is because enforcing such a ban is equal to the notion of introducing modifications in the law that is supported by a majority of the public. The process of curbing violence is not as simple as going ahead and putting a ban on gun ownership. It goes much deeper than that as it requires “serious attempts to understand how guns get into their hands in the first place” (Johnson).

Read More
1235 Words | 5 Pages

This way of thinking is understandable because if we don't get weapons, then how are we supposed to protect ourselves. I also disagree with this because if the laws are more strict then there will be less crime and this will make them not want to do the right thing. Some argue that making gun control laws more strict is not the best way to go. ( Sheldon Richman) argues that gun control is ineffective at preventing crime.

Read More
770 Words | 4 Pages

The laws that were passed play an important role in Gun control and they can help the crime rates with guns go down. Gun Control can do its job with interfering with law abiding gun owners as little as possible. Many people believe that Gun Control laws are not going to stop the rate of murders and deaths go down because they say that it is not the

Read More
407 Words | 2 Pages

Many anti-gun people think that gun control laws will help the community and will make crime rates lower but this is not the case. Chicago is one of the most dangerous states in the U.S. and they are one of the few that have strict gun laws but their crime rates are higher than almost every state. It's not only Chicago but New York as well. This proves that having strict gun laws won't make situations better but only worse on the community. Having strict gun laws isn't having benefits on the community other than a false sense of safety.

Read More
1432 Words | 6 Pages

Guns are just a tool, like knives and hammers and it completely depends on the people on how they use it. People who support guns and arms say that the Second Amendment secures individual’s right to carry guns with them and that gun rights is needed for self-protection, and was intended for military to have peace and defend the country if needed (Spitzer, 70). Most of the Americans use guns as a source to protect themselves and they believe that gun ownership prevents crime. A study conducted on November 26, 2013 showed that bans on weapons did not significantly affect murder rates at the state level (Lane, 5). Moreover, even if the rules and regulations are executed on gun control, not all criminals obey the law.

Read More
731 Words | 3 Pages

Most people that commit violent gun crimes are mentally ill, for example the last school shooting that occured on february 14 2018 at Marjory stoneman douglas high school in parkland florida, the gunman Nikolas Cruz was mentally ill. He walked into the school with his guns and shot and killed 17 students and a teacher. He had issues with learning, and controlling his emotions and stuff. (source)

Read More
1856 Words | 8 Pages

There was a case of a 13 year old boy killing a 19 year old because he was acting out a plot he had seen on TV. The real question about this is why did a 13 year old have unsupervised access to a deadly weapon in the first place. Lousy parenting could be largely at blame for many of the incidents like this one. If a child believes it is okay to kill people just because they saw it on TV or in a video game then they haven’t had someone telling them right from wrong while growing up. No matter how much control supporters push for legislation, the NRA single handedly blocks their path and they also represent the views of hunters and sportsman who’s lives revolve around guns.

Read More

More about Summary: The Gun Debate

Open Document