ipl-logo

Supreme Court Case Analysis

1097 Words5 Pages

a) Article III of the Constitution provides a foundation for the federal courts. i) The judicial system represents 1 of 3 branches of the federal government, yet the Article is extremely open ended. (1) The appointment of a federal judge is decided by the President, as state in Article II, Section 2, Clause 2. (2) The vague nature in regards to SCOTUS: , “The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behavior, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office.” (a) The phrase, ‘during good behavior’ is indicative of a lifelong term. This can be traced back to the Settlement Act of 1701. (i) This document states …show more content…

i) Alexander Hamilton (in the Federalist Papers) appointed judges were viewed as the ‘least dangerous’ of all branches of the federal government. They held no power of the sword or the purse. (1) This idea is outdates, federal courts hold extensive influence on national laws and policies. (2) Supreme Court rules on decisions regarding the sword and the purse. ii) Tenure of a SCOTUS judge is on average 26.1 years, however in the beginning, it was closer to 7.5 years. c) American process of life tenure is fundamentally flawed, resulting in justices remaining in positions of power for significantly longer periods of time than ever before…thus reducing the Efficacy of democratic checks, provided by the appointment process. 2) A-political a) It was intended that the Supreme Court would be a federal branch of government, immune to politics and personal philosophies. Politics, in general, prevent federal judges from fully upholding the constitution as it was meant to be interpreted. Lengthy terms-> litany of problems. i) Must be independent & a-political (a) 57% of voters are very concerned that Federal judges make decisions based upon political agenda rather than rightful …show more content…

(a) NYT’s: justices are significantly more likely to support the plaintiff if their appeal matches the courts political viewpoint.. (i) Justice Scalia, voted in support of free speech rights of conservative speakers 3 times as often as liberal speakers. (ii) From 1986 to 2011, Scalia voted in favor of conservative cases 65% of the time. (4) Elena Kagan is the 4th women to ever serve as a supreme justice. (a) Higher court turnover rates could potentially benefit the court by creating more opportunities for gender and race diversification. (5) Term limits would reduce political influence. (a) Filling Supreme Court seats is a ‘cardinal presidential power’, however life tenure creates a game of political chance. Court justices strategically plan their retirement so as to ensure that the presiding judge will have similar political views (ie. Democratic vs. republican) 1. Wait for a like-minded president. 2. This causes politically minded justices to remain in court longer, thus leading to a life tenure. (refer to Harvard

Show More
Related

John Adams Presidency Dbq Essay

350 Words | 2 Pages

Before the end of John Adams presidency, he decided to appoint as many Federalist judges as possible. This was called the Judiciary Act of 1801 and it also stated that the judges couldn’t be removed. Adams knew that once Jefferson took over, he would turn the government and the country around based on Democratic Republican beliefs. John Adams didn’t want the government to be taken over by Democratic Republicans, also known as radicals, who were people that took extreme political positions. He thought that they would ruin the country and wanted some Federalist powers to remain in the government even after his presidency.

Read More

Law Clerks In Storm Center By David O Brien

886 Words | 4 Pages

As O’Brien analyzes this transition it can seem as though the modern Justices are just trying to put their work off on other people. However, this just merely scratches the surface of what’s actually going on. The growing importance of law clerks over time not only reflects the growth and expansion of the United States as a whole but also shifts in how our society functions. As a result, the Court has had to take on more responsibility, while also changing the way they approach their jobs. There is no doubt that the Supreme Court has become more institutionalized since its founding, due its growing caseload.

Read More

Summary Of Gerald Rosenberg's Book 'The Hollow Hope'

710 Words | 3 Pages

Alex Frost Values: Law & Society 9/23/2014 The Hollow Hope Introduction and Chapter 1 Gerald Rosenberg begins his book by posing the questions he will attempt to answer for the reader throughout the rest of the text: Under what conditions do courts produce political and social change? And how effective have the courts been in producing social change under such past decisions as Roe v. Wade and Brown v. Board of Education? He then works to define some of the principles and view points 'currently' held about the US Supreme court system.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Judges Being Appointed

167 Words | 1 Pages

The quality of judges would without a doubt increase if they were appointed. However, I do not agree with the idea of judges being appointed. When looking at the partisan aspect you notice several possible issues with one issue being, is that individual the right person to do the job. Partisan election of judges allows for an individual that may not be as qualified for the job to be elected into the position. Nevertheless the partisan election of judges gives the voters what they want based on party affiliation along with qualifications.

Read More

Judge Dee Character Traits

1389 Words | 6 Pages

His rulings as a judge will set the precedent and expectation for the people of the district. There are three cases that

Read More

Pros And Cons Of The United States And Military Legal System

944 Words | 4 Pages

The 50 states and the District of Columbia can have their own laws and legal system which includes courts, prisons, and law enforcement officers. The United States also has the Civil Court, Criminal Courts, US Court of Appeals, US District Courts, and Supreme Court which is the highest court in the land. The President of the United States appoints nine Supreme Court judges who hold their office for life.

Read More

Term Limits In The Supreme Court

339 Words | 2 Pages

This shows that term limits in the Supreme Court became more important. For example, if they have more mature members, they would understand the law, and would understand the politics and their decisions on the society. Mr. Ingraham stated

Read More

Summary: The Importance Of Diversity In The Supreme Court

607 Words | 3 Pages

One important fact is that all members of the Supreme Court graduated from just three Ivy League law schools. All nine justices, either attended Yale or Harvard University. 2. Another fact, is none of the members are Protestant. Not a single one, is an evangelical Christian or a Protestant of any other denomination.

Read More

Summary Of Broken Bench

247 Words | 1 Pages

The article Broken Bench explains the controversy over having “tiny courts” in New York State. The author, William Glaberson argues that the idea of justice within the jurisdiction of these tiny courts is unfairly decided among the justices in charge. Due to the lack of experience of these justices, it is difficult for fair justice to be dealt out. One of the major causes explained by the author for unfair justice is that the justices of the court are very inexperienced. For example, William Glaberson states, “Nearly three-quarters of the judges are not lawyers, and many — truck drivers, sewer workers or laborers — have scant grasp of the most basic legal principles.

Read More

Why The Judicial Branch Is The Most Powerful

478 Words | 2 Pages

Hana Kim Professor Yvonne Wollenberg Law and Politics 106 7 October 2015 Title In the United States government, there are three branches called the legislative, executive, and judicial branch. Out of these three, the judicial branch is the most powerful. The judicial branch is made up of the Supreme Court, the court with the most power in the country, and other federal courts that are lower in the system; the purpose of this branch is to look over laws and make sure they are constitutional and reasonable.

Read More

The Constrained Court

429 Words | 2 Pages

Courts prove unsuccessful in achieving social change due to the constraints on the court’s power. Rosenburg’s assessment that courts are “an institution that is structurally challenged” demonstrates the Constrained Court view. In this view, the Court’s lack of judicial independence, inability to implement policies, and the limited nature of constitutional rights inhibit courts from producing real social reform. For activists to bring a claim to court, they must frame their goal as a right guaranteed by the constitution, leading to the courts hearing less cases (Rosenburg 11). The nature of the three branches also creates a system of checks and balances in which Congress or the executive branch can reverse a controversial decision, rendering the Court’s impact void.

Read More

• How Is Your Role In Government Different From An Elected Official

474 Words | 2 Pages

Robinson: Federal judges, like members of Congress and the president, exist in government to serve the people. However, voters elect senators, representatives, and the president while the president appoints federal judges with the Senate's approval. The framers of the Constitution set it up this way because they wanted judges to make decisions based on the laws and Constitution, rather than the will of the people, which can change from moment to moment. The president and Senate are hoping to seat a judge who will support their laws when faced with a case that challenges them.

Read More

Essay On Judicial Selection

801 Words | 4 Pages

Judicial selection is an intriguing topic as there are multiple ways that judges take their seat on the bench. The United States Constitution spells out how federal judges are selected and leaves it up to the individual states to establish their means for selecting judges. In federal courts, judges are appointed and it varies between appointment and election for state courts. The purpose of this paper is to examine the differences between appointments and elections (as well as the multiple types of elections) and to give an opinion as to which is the better alternative. Federal judges are appointed by the President of the United States and are confirmed on the advice and consent of the United States Senate.

Read More

Essay On Becoming A Federal Judge

495 Words | 2 Pages

Have you ever wondered what it would be like to judge someone’s fate? This is what a federal judge does almost every day. A federal judge is a person who decides cases in court. While some believe that judges’ have an easy job, it is very stressful. Even though it is a hard job it is a very important role in society and a highly respected occupation.

Read More

More about Supreme Court Case Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document