ipl-logo

• How Is Your Role In Government Different From An Elected Official

474 Words2 Pages

Interviewing the honorable Sam Robinson Rem: How is your role in government different from an elected official? Robinson: My role in the government is different compared to that of elected officials. My job is to make sure all the required processes are followed and that all the facts are stated and analyzed, and also to make sure everything is fair. We exist to serve the people, and are not elected under any political parties. Even though it is the people that we exist to serve, we are appointed by the president not the people. Rem: How is it the same? Robinson: We all serve the values and morals, as well as serve the same people. Rem: Do you think judges should be elected? Explain why or why not. Robinson: Federal judges, like members of Congress and the president, exist in government to serve the people. However, voters elect senators, representatives, and the president while the president appoints federal judges with the Senate's approval. The framers of the Constitution set it up this way because they wanted judges to make decisions based on the laws and Constitution, rather than the will of the people, which can change from moment to moment. The president and Senate are hoping to seat a judge who will support their laws when faced with a case that challenges them. So no, I don't think judges should be elected because people don’t know what to look for when electing a judge. Being appointed by the president is better. …show more content…

Robinson: Judicial review is the power of federal courts to review laws of Congress and acts of the executive branch in the light of the Constitution, with the possibility that they will rule them to be unconstitutional. Rem: Please explain the role of judicial review in a case you recently

Open Document