ipl-logo

Synthesis Essay On Animal Testing

823 Words4 Pages

Ronan Redar
Ms. Yeates
2W AP English Language
Friday, January 6, 2023

Over the years, numerous ethical and safety concerns have been raised concerning the use of animals for medical research and testing. Although there are problems with animal testing, there are no alternatives that yield results as accurate as animal testing. Animal testing is crucial to insure the safety of human patients, it allows researchers to observe the effects of a certain treatment, and strict regulations are placed on any testing done on animals. For these reasons, animal testing should remain legal.
Animal testing should be legal because it allows for medical testing and development to be conducted without putting humans at risk. Source A supports this, stating …show more content…

In the past, testing has been conducted on human patients, often without their consent. This is far more ethically problematic than testing on rats, mice, and even dogs or other primates. While testing on humans may be more accurate, when a new treatment seems propitious “it is then tested in animals to see whether it seems to be safe and effective” (Source H). Additionally, there are strict regulations on animal testing, and there is a strict vetting procedure before animal testing is started. Further, Source D shows that as well as a sizable decrease in the number of animals tested in the US since 1973, only a small percentage of tests are run on dogs, cats and primates, and according to Source A, 95% of tests are done on rodents. Additionally, according to Source E the AWA “sets strict standards of care” for animals, and the USDA enforces these standards among organizations. Even more strict regulations are set upon organizations receiving federal funding. These regulations ensure that animals are treated humanely, and it prevents placing humans in unnecessary danger or deceiving …show more content…

One of the most prevalent arguments against animal research is that it can be inaccurate due to physiological differences between animals and humans. Source B states that “psychopathology, cancer, drug addiction, Alzheimer’s, and AIDS, are species-specific”. However, this is a broad overgeneralization. Cancer can of course be observed in a plethora of species. Drug addiction and psychopathology (mental disorders or illnesses) can be observed in animals. Even Alzheimer's can be induced in rodents and yield meaningful information. Source B also raises the point that different substances can have different effects on different species. While this is of course true, rodents are so physiologically similar to humans that this is rarely the case, and it isn’t much of a problem because scientists can figure out what animals can be used to test for, and what they are too different to yield valid results. Source F further argues that only 92% of drugs that pass the animal testing phase are put into use. However, 8% of those drugs going on to be approved means that there is still a good chance that a drug used in animal testing will go on to help humans with medical

Show More
Related
724 Words | 3 Pages

Test on animals may not work on humans. 94% of drugs that pass animal tests fails on human clinical trials. When they test drugs on animals and it works, most of the time it won’t work on humans. Tests on animals are flawed. 87% of the studies on rodents and primates failed to randomize the selection of animals.

Read More
1490 Words | 6 Pages

Despite many past medical advances being attributable to animal tests, in modern day society, the ethical treatment of lab animals and the accuracy of test results

Read More
169 Words | 1 Pages

Many people believe that animals have a different anatomy than humans, therefore, scientists should not rely on animal testing. In contrast, others say that it’s safer to test medicines on animals before giving them to people; in this way scientists make sure that their medicines are not toxic, nor harmful to humans. Further,

Read More
871 Words | 4 Pages

Marc Bekoff, Ph.D. professor at University of Colorado in Boulder, explains that the vast majority of drugs, 92 percent according to the FDA, that pass tests on animals do not happen to work on humans (Bekoff). Scientists cannot accurately predict how a chemical will behave on a human because less that 10 percent of the human illnesses being tested for are seen in animals. That would make sense because animals are completely different when compared to a human. If animal testing is just based on a bunch of luck, than it is wasteful to be testing on an animal. Dr. Ronald Davis of Stanford University has a negative interpretation on animal testing.

Read More
1058 Words | 5 Pages

ENG102 SEC33 – Therese Nasrallah - Synthesis Matrix Template – Spring2017 Name: Michel Abboud My Claim: Animal testing in biomedical research .

Read More
434 Words | 2 Pages

Close genetic animals are heavily regulated to be experimented on. A sleeping pill called “thalidomide, which caused 10,000 babies to be born with severe deformities” happened to be tested and approved for distribution (ProCon, 3). Animal testing does not ensure safety for humans. Animal testing consists of “63 alternative test methods [that] have now been accepted by regulatory authorities” stating the solution of ending animal testing (Stokes, 2). The continuation of animal testing could be harmful to advancements in science.

Read More
1018 Words | 5 Pages

According to a study done by the FDA, ninety-two percent of drugs, which were produced from animal models, failed to be approved for regular use by humans after they were tested on humans (neavs.org). This means that the vast majority of drugs made from animal testing were not able to help humans and the suffering of those animal models was simply a waste. Elias Zerhouni, who is a medical doctor, researcher, and the former director of the National Institutes of Health, even went as far to say that animal testing has led research to stray away from being used for comprehension of human biology, and we should refocus away from animal testing to get back on track for medical progress (McManus). This shows that animal testing is not helping us understand and cure human diseases. Some people believe that such examples as the use of mice to produce Gleevec, a drug that fights cancer, is reason enough to say that animal testing benefits humans medically (amprogress.org).

Read More
1817 Words | 8 Pages

This is because the anatomic, metabolic and cellular differences of animal and human are very much different from each other which makes them as poor test model as much as irreliable in predicting results in human beings. For instances, cancer has an absymal record of failures where both humans and animals react differently when tested with carcinogen (Greek, 2007). Besides, animal test could also mislead researchers into ignoring potential cures and treatment. Aspirin for example, can be used to reduce fever and relieve mild to moderate pain are found to be harmful to some animal species. These promising drugs may get shelved when they cause problems in animals which are not relevent for human.

Read More
878 Words | 4 Pages

Animal testing has been a controversial issue for the past thirty years. Society feels as if animal testing is a technique of the past and should be outlawed in the United States like the majority of the world. Federal law shows us how little protection animals have, numerous recalled or discontinued medications are proof that research on animals to predict effects on the human body is highly unreliable. The humane society provides numerous examples of the cruel treatments and conditions animals must endure. Scientists have presented us with alternatives that are more cost-effective and produce less waste with higher accuracy rates.

Read More
635 Words | 3 Pages

there have been 100’s of medications that had to be tested on animals before being tested on human subjects. Theses medications are everyday things that affect people, Cymbalta a medication for nerve pain and depression were created with the help of mice,dogs and rats. Mental health medications are the 14th most prescribed as 1 in every 6 americans is on a form of medication for mental health. These types of medication can be made without animal help. 12.7 million have cancer, the first form of chemotherapy was made from modified mustard gas used on masses inside mice, these forms of treatment later developed into the chemo we use today.

Read More
2232 Words | 9 Pages

It does not make sense to use animals for medicine that will be taken by humans, simply because we are different. We do not have the same genetic makeup, and therefore, we should not be trusting these results. We need to discontinue the use of animals in research and introduce safer alternatives that generate more accurate results. First I will explain what type of trials these animals go through, and for what reasons.

Read More
604 Words | 3 Pages

Millions upon millions of animals are killed mercilessly every year due to these experiments. “Most animal experiments are not relevant to human health, they do not contribute meaningfully to medical advances and many are undertaken simply out of curiosity and do not even pretend to hold promise for curing illnesses” (Animal). Not only does this testing waste animal lives, but humans as well. Because animal testing is so ineffective, many humans have contracted illness, irritations, mental problems, etc. because of these drugs being successful on animals and not humans.

Read More
1425 Words | 6 Pages

90% of drugs fail in human trials despite promising results in animal tests. Animal testing is not only cruel, but highly unreliable, even dangerous, and it should not be allowed. The continued use of animals to test the effectiveness of medications and health interventions in humans is comparable to using smoke signals instead of phone calls as a method of communication. In all reality, animal testing has never truly worked because of its ineffectiveness, wasteful tactics, unethical ways, and there are other methods available. Now first of all, animal testing is ineffective.

Read More
1232 Words | 5 Pages

As animal experimentation advances; it has become a highly prevalent and controversial topic being debated in society. Animal testing is conducted primarily by medical professionals for research to uncover new surgical procedures and to determine the safety outcomes of materials (“Animal Experimentation”). Animal experimentation has highlighted the significance of the concern of many individuals due to the negative impacts it leaves on various species. According to a survey conducted in 2015, 67% of Americans are unsettled and perturbed about animals being experimented on for research analysis (“Americans’ Concern”). The spread of individual views concerning animal testing on social media platforms has attracted the attention of scientists.

Read More
398 Words | 2 Pages

Researchers estimated over 26 million animals were used for scientific tests and commercial testing subject every year in the United States. Over the years animals were used to be tested on medical treatments, products for human uses, health care, and etc. The practice of researching on living animals has started since 500 BC. Opponents of this act say that it is cruel to experiment on animals, there are other methods available to replace the cruel act of experimenting on living animals, and that the human bodies and animal’s bodies are totally two different features and the research often yields irrelevant results. The federal Animal Welfare or AWA passed the animal testing act in 1966 and amended in 1970, 1976, and 1985.

Read More

More about Synthesis Essay On Animal Testing

Related Topics

Open Document