ipl-logo

The Assassination Of Julius Caesar: Eyewitness To History

393 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Critical analysis of julius caesar

The Assassination of Julius Caesar, 44 BC," EyeWitness to History, www.eyewitnesstohistory.com (2004). In January of 49 BC, Julius Caesar led his army across the Rubicon River in Northern Italy (see Caesar Crosses the Rubicon, 49 BC) and plunged the Roman Republic into civil war. Caesar's rival, Pompey, fled to Greece. Within three months Caesar controlled the entire Italian peninsula and in Spain had defeated the legions loyal to Pompey by Michael Parenti Published on 8-18-03 Finally Caesar entered the chamber. He had an imposing presence, augmented by an air of command that came with being at the height of his power. Moving quickly to the front of the hall, he sat himself in the place of honor. First to approach him was a senator who pretended to enter a personal …show more content…

Article Title Julius Caesar Biography Author Website Name The Biography.com website URL https://www.biography.com/people/julius-caesar-9192504 Access Date May 12, 2018 Julius Caesar was assassinated by political rivals on the Ides of March (the 15th), 44 BC. It's not clear whether Caesar knew of the plot to kill him; by all accounts he planned to leave Rome on March 18 for a mili tary campaign in what is now modern-day Iraq, where he hoped to avenge the losses suffered by his former political ally Crassus. Livius.org Jona Lendering Describing someone's life is a meaningless thing to do, unless there is some moral to be learned. Suetonius' moral is clear: if a man has the total freedom and the absolute power of a Roman emperor, he must be strong indeed if he wants to remain honest. To show this, he is fond of stories about cruelty and sexual deviations. Of course, this makes him one of the most interesting authors of antiquity, but sometimes he seems to portray his emperor's a nuance too

Show More
Related
182 Words | 1 Pages

The death of a man, Julius Caesar. In 44 B.C. Julius Caesar the Roman dictator was loved by many citizens of Rome, but he was not loved by all. Some citizens of Rome hated Julius many of them in the senate. Two big conspirators of his death were Brutus and Cassius.

Read More
591 Words | 3 Pages

Have you ever wondered who killed Julius Caesar? It was a dark day that day you know March 15Th 44 BC the day that Julius Caesar was brutally murdered at the meeting in the Senate building. The people who were responsible for the assassination of Julius Caesar were Brutus, Cassius, and other members of the Senate. The first member of the Senate that took part in Julius’s murder was his thought to be friend Brutus.

Read More
1993 Words | 8 Pages

Death of the Republic 91202 James Morrissey Power in a name Julius Caesar was popular among the citizens of Rome. Caesar had gained this popularity due to his successes in war for Rome and the laws he created for the wellbeing of Rome. The reason Caesar was assassinated in 44 BC was due to declaring himself dictator for life of Rome. This is because the term dictator was considered a toxic word in Roman politics as almost all previous dictators had been tyrants in Roman history. The senators who assassinated Caesar believed that they would be celebrated for killing Caesar .

Read More
993 Words | 4 Pages

This paper aims to make an insightful comparison of two great leaders of history whom were assassinated by conspirators during the height of their political lives. By exploring the assassination and lives of these two men we can more clearly understand the historical and social events that underpin a conspiracy as grand as these. The life and death of Julius Caesar is one of the original grand conspiracies in history, as his ambition grew so did the envy of his fellow senators. Julius Caesar was born to a noble family and inherited a relatively high status in ancient Rome’s hierarchy.

Read More
1054 Words | 5 Pages

Julius Caesar and Abraham Lincoln are unquestionably two of the great men that made significant history via their exemplary leadership expeditions in their respective countries. In comparing the two, one of the remarkable similar aspect of the history that came up between them was their assassination. Caesar is recalled as one of the history strongest general and an exemplary leader of the great roman republic. Many referred him as a demagogue and a dictator due to his act of abuse of power and disregard of the Roman laws that existed (Griffin, 2009).. He led his army in multiple battles against their enemies in 15 years during the civil war.

Read More
1473 Words | 6 Pages

In the greatness of ancient Rome, an evil act took place that destroyed the balance of power and changed the course of history. Even though some have praised Julius Caesar's assassination as a courageous attempt to protect the Republic, it is clear that it was a planned murderous act that called for legal consequences. Senators became irritated with Julius Caesar as he made changes and grew in power. On March 44 BCE, a group of conspirators assassinated Caesar within the Senate walls. The assassination of Julius Caesar was a determined act of violence that should be punished under the law, despite political motives and noble intentions.

Read More
463 Words | 2 Pages

Caesar then went to Egypt, where he defeated the pharaoh and named Cleopatra as the Queen of Egypt. Julius Caesar remained the “Roman Dictator” until he was assassinated on March 15, 44

Read More
718 Words | 3 Pages

In the play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Caesar was killed by a bunch people in Rome. The information is from the book and the play. The man, Julius Caesar, was killed because Rome wanted to be free. The Julius Caesar play was based on how they turned their back on him and took his life for one simple reason.

Read More
191 Words | 1 Pages

Julius Caesar, husband of Calphurnia and possibly the greatest ruler Rome has seen, was assassinated on the Ides of March. We cannot say this was a huge surprise to us, as a soothsayer had cautioned Caesar to “Beware the Ides of March” (Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Act 1 Scene 2, Line 20). Calphurnia allegedly begged Caesar to stay home on that very day fearing that something terrible would happen, but Decius persuaded Caesar otherwise. The great leader was later stabbed to his death by a group of conspirators, of which only 16 have been identified. The leaders of this conspiracy are known to be Marcus Brutus and Caius Cassius.

Read More
896 Words | 4 Pages

Through his drive for success, Caesar took advantage of every opportunity to rise in Roman society, from starting his career as military tribune to becoming quaestor of Further Spain and later curator of Rome (Freeman 2008:45). His tenure as consul with Marcus Calpurnius Bibulus became known as “…the consulship of Julius and Caesar...” resulting from Caesar’s ambition to undertake all of Rome’s state affairs (Suetonius The Lives of Caesars XX.59). It was the result of Caesar’s ambition that led him to cross the Rubicon river, Rome’s northern boundary, to protect his political position in Rome. By not disbanding his army, Caesar was effectively disregarding the boundary regulation of the Rubicon and this implied civil war (Class Notes Part II 2017:131). This ambitious action can best be described by a quote from Caesar himself which states “if you must break the law, do it to seize power: in all other cases, observe it.”

Read More
414 Words | 2 Pages

Marc Antony’s speech to the plebeians at Julius Caesar’s funeral on the Ides of March presented the idea that Caesar’s actions were verifiable. However, Antony also bent the truth in order to earn the support and trust of the plebeians. This should not be taken lightly as it irresponsibly and intentionally aroused the plebeians into chaos and violence. Antony began his funeral oration by proclaiming that the conspirators were “honorable men.” However, as his speech progressed, it seemed clear that his intentions were the opposite.

Read More
498 Words | 2 Pages

At twenty years old, Julius Caesar had survived the most violent years in the recent history of Rome. He had defied a vengeful dictator and lived to tell the tale. He had displayed courage, self-assurance, and unyielding will. Unfortunately, none of those qualities would get him elected to one of Rome’s high offices. He had no experience in the day-to-day details of public service, he had not distinguished himself in battle, and he had never stood in the Forum to dazzle an audience with his eloquence.

Read More
737 Words | 3 Pages

In public, Caesar was the leader Rome had always wished for, a strong, valliant man that would let nothing in his way. Consequently, Caesar had a more vulnerable side to him where the reader would be able to see glimpses of throughout the play. Still, Caesar allowed his public self image to take priority in which would eventually lead to his death. Speaking historically, the great Julius Caesar was a people’s leader with a deep hunger for power in which he would do anything to

Read More
1282 Words | 6 Pages

Although the Roman public loved him, many higher Romans believed that he was becoming dangerous. These feelings ultimately led to the murder of Julius Caesar in 44 B.C. when he was stabbed 35 times. This period of uncertainty lasted approximately

Read More
1179 Words | 5 Pages

He was naive to think that his assassination was not near because the other senators disliked him greatly. The first to stab him was Servilius Casca, and others soon joined in. (History.com Staff). Julius Caesar was assassinated on the Ides of March, in 44 B.C. on the steps of the senate. The Ides of March is the middle of the month, which happened to be the 17th.

Read More

More about The Assassination Of Julius Caesar: Eyewitness To History

Related Topics

Open Document