Reaction Paper About The Big Bang Theory

918 Words4 Pages

Long before present times, human-kind has been searching for an origin of our existence. Over time many theories and religious beliefs have been formed around the everlasting questions of our origin. Much debate has been generated over this topic and the most widely known as well as supported conclusion is of the Big Bang Theory. The Big Bang Theory was originally generated by Alexander Friedmann, who interpreted the start of the universe as a sudden expansion or reaction, while observing the expansion of the universe, forming the universe as we know today.
Among many other theories the Big Bang is regarded as the most probable and comprehensible theory by far; reasons for this originate from a scientific cradle of measurable and statistical facts as well as theories. The universe has been recently observed as an expanding production of its source (whatever it may be). The Big Bang Theory can be referred as the most presumptive theory as to why the universe is the way it is, reasons for this include the scientific …show more content…

The Hubble’s Law does not state that we, Earth and our galaxy is where the universe originated, so much as if we were anywhere in the universe we could observe expansion identically. The law also states that astral bodies such as the Milky Way are not accelerating in space, “away” from other forms, but rather moving at a constant speed. The Hubble’s constant is the universe expansion rate, which is a constant speed at which the universe expands; if Hubble’s law is accurate and factual, one may draw conclusions of the accuracy of the Big Bang Theory. Since the largest supporting factor of the Big Bang Theory is in fact the constant increase in size of the universe and the conclusion of an origin or a sudden “start” of this said expansion, Hubble’s Law is mostly in grave support of the Big Bang