ipl-logo

The Controversy Between Euthanasia And Assisted Suicide

921 Words4 Pages

In the 21st Century many bioethical issues have come into debate and question on whether they are ethical or not. One of these issues that has been a currents issue is euthanasia. Euthanasia is sometimes thought to be the same as assisted suicide, but they differ in certain aspects of each. Euthanasia as defined by The Patients Rights Council is, “knowingly and directly acting to cause the death of another person (e.g., giving a lethal injection)” , while PRC defines assisted suicide as,” intentionally, knowingly and directly providing the means of death to another person so that the person can use that means to commit suicide (e.g., providing a prescription for a lethal dose of drugs)”.. There are different types of euthanasia used active …show more content…

Active euthanasia is administering lethal ways to kill, such as lethal injection , while passive euthanasia is withholding substances that are necessary for life to continue, such as a medicine or antibiotic needed to live. Euthanasia can also be conducted voluntary , non-voluntary , or involuntary depending on the state of the patient it being administered on. Voluntary euthanasia is when the patient willingly consents to the act of being euthanized either passively or actively. This type of euthanasia is legal is certain parts of the world either actively or passively. Non-voluntary euthanasia is when the patient being euthanised can not o does not have the ability to consent with the euthanasia. This type of euthanasia is illegal, but with special circumstances in parts of the world. Involuntary euthanasia is when the patient being euthanised does not willingly consent to being euthanised. These different types of …show more content…

People who believe euthanasia is unethical are considered pro-life, and use the arguments of it being against their religious views, devaluing human life, and the”slippery slope”effect. The arguments of being anti euthanasia from conflicting with religious views are mostly people who are followers of the Abrahamic religions of Judaism, Christianity and Islam. They use the argument of the ”sanctity of life” , that God's creations are sacred, so therefore human life is sacred, and by ending human life is destroying God’s creation. People also use the religious argument of euthanasia acting or taking the role of God. They believe that God alone can choose when to give and take away life, and that when people perform euthanasia they are trying to be god and are committing a sin against God. People also use the argument of how it is wrong to value the quality of life over the sanctity of life, as a way to show how euthanasia is wrong. People also use the “Slippery slope” as argument and risk of euthanasia. The “slippery slope” argument is the idea that there might be reasons that people do euthanasia for reasons of a misdiagnosis or to not be a burden or that if people with terminal illnesses choose euthanasia, there will no reason to research or find cures for their terminal

Open Document