For a society to run, there should be a proper balance in every other step and to maintain that there had to be certain classes which executed their activities as per the need of the society. So, it was totally fine to have the different level of classes. There are laws which would not let poor be affected easily unless they are the culprit and they would be compensated with money if they are not found guilty. It sounds even as each group was best represented in their own way.
They had a kinship based ranking under hereditary leaders. Their economic organization was central accumulation and redistribution they even had some craft specialist. Finally in the state they had about 20,000+ people in their society. They lived in urban cities and towns. In this society they had taxation and laws.
On top of the peasants or other lower classes there were
In Mesopotamia the classes were fundamentally the same as aside from the way that they had cleric positioned at the exceptionally beat. And in addition not each city was the very same when it came to social positioning like Egypt. While slaves involved the base spot in the social pecking order, they were frequently ready to procure cash and even purchase their opportunity. Subjection in Egypt appears to have taken after the essential example set in Mesopotamia. One could turn into a slave
This fairly classless system changed, though, with the introduction of tobacco. Those with more land became richer, and part of a new upper class. They would hire indentured servants to work for them, and these indentured servants formed the lower class. Former indentured servants formed a sort of middle class. However, this class system was not unmoving.
Most of the individuals in this society followed the group system. The Group system was a group of slaves would work together on one task. The group would work together on one common goal until that task was completed. The second deeply entrenched slave system, was the task system. The task system was each slave would be given a different task.
For centuries, the caste system dictated almost every aspect of Hindu life. The caste would eventually split up into upper and lower classes, causing a segregation between both communities. There have been many attempts to get rid of the system, but unfortunately it is still being used in India today. In Document 3, the excerpt from the Mahabharata states “Enjoy the pleasure bestowed on you, and bear the pain on you.” Referring to the caste system, this statement describes the pleasures or the pain that a Hindu receives in their lifetime.
The highest class included the ruler, his top officials, powerful priests, wealthy merchants, and owners of large plots of land. The middle class had farmers and skilled workers. The lowest class was mostly slaves. The city-states’ governments and Sumerian religious beliefs, which were connected, helped support this social order. Religion
They would have certain classes. Upper and common class. This made things very different for each class. The richer people did not receive worse punishments because they had money to not be tortured. Certain punishments were followed out for different crime.
600-1450 Remember each box needs two separate examples. Continuity (Something that has stayed the same from the beginning of the period to the end) Change (Something that has changed from the beginning of the period until the end) East Asia 1. Buddhism which found its way to China through the Silk Road becomes a highly influential religion among the people and among the emperors from the Sui, Tang, Song, and even the Mongol Yuan dynasties.
Caste: The Origins of Our Discontents by Isabel Wilkerson argues that the United States, as well as other countries have a caste system that is based on race and history due to slavery and discrimination. Wilkerson explains that caste is a social order that is enforced through social and cultural norms and that it is different from class or race-based discrimination. Additionally, she argues that caste is a system of social classification that is based on ancestry and birth. In the United States, the caste system is based on race with white people at the top, and black people at the bottom. She believes that this caste system is implanted in American society and that it has roots in our history, slavery and Jim Crow segregation.
There were large gaps in between each one, causing oppression for the lower classes. Slavery was a large part of the South's way of life and only emphasized how important social status was within the community. It was a place where the few large plantation owners influenced may and the people below them strived to climb from their lower social
History of the particular policy domain, social and political processes, like McGirr in “Making Radical Reform” and Alexander in “The Rebirth of Caste”, policies regulating the use of substances, the prohibition of alcohol in McGirr and the War on Drugs in Alexander, were developed in response to larger social and political power struggles around ethnicity and or race. In McGirr's reading, we can see an illustration of how prohibition was linked to racism affecting the latest immigration waves in the nineteenth century. In the New Jim Crow, Alexander described the racialization of drugs such as crack cocaine as the primary factor for the brutal policy response. The drug war in the United States has constantly exposed large amounts to criminalization,
Some might argue that India’s Caste system is closely related to However, Caste and social hierarchy were more different because Caste happens over different lifetimes, and social hierarchy can happen over one. In the caste system people could move their position in their current life, however they could have moved up or down depending on how they acted in their last life. In the Social hierarchy, men could move up or down depending on whom they married, however women could not move throughout the chain. “Women were generally seen as inferior to men, dominated by their bodies rather than their minds.” (McKay pg
Article 14 of the Constitution of India stipulates that “the state not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India. Protection prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion race, caste, sex or place of birth.” Therefore this law should imply that all Indian women have and can practice the same rights as men. However these laws, while legally set in stone, are not socially acknowledged much of the time.
