After all the evidence found against Steven Avery, his trial now comes to an end. Steven's lawyers affirm that if he was to win the case, he could not be able to get his reputation back, but could only hope for his liberty. In this final trial, Steven's lawyers close arguments, the prosecutor settles cases, and the juries have their last debate. As mentioned, Steven's lawyers put an end to disputes as they claim that there was evidence for Steven that was not even considered. No blood trails were seen in the examination done in Steven's home. There was no indication of Teresa's body being restrained. It was presumed that Teresa was not killed in Steven's trailer, but in his garage. His defendants wanted the presumption of officers planting evidence to be done. The lawyers did not think that the officers killed Teresa, but they did believe that someone skillfully had led the evidence to Steven. …show more content…
He brings up evidence of Teresa's presence in Steven's trailer the same day she was found dead. A bill of sale and an Auto Trader magazine that belonged to Teresa was found at his residence. He brings back awareness of the bullet that had been found in his garage. When the cartridge was tested, it had Teresa's DNA. Kratz did not want to make the presumption that his officers planted evidence because it would ruin their reputations. Because of this, Kratz was accused of speaking in an unprofessional manner. Furthermore, as the trial approached an end, the juries have their final debate. The board did not come up with an immediate decision, so the court had to wait until the next day to do so. When this court day arrived, one of the jurors had to leave for a family emergency. A substitute juror had to be placed. The trail began. On Count 1, Steven was found guilty. On Count 2, Steven was found not guilty. On Count 3, Steven was not guilty. Due to these results, Steven gets the life