ipl-logo

The Evidence Of Steven Avery's Trial

431 Words2 Pages

After all the evidence found against Steven Avery, his trial now comes to an end. Steven's lawyers affirm that if he was to win the case, he could not be able to get his reputation back, but could only hope for his liberty. In this final trial, Steven's lawyers close arguments, the prosecutor settles cases, and the juries have their last debate. As mentioned, Steven's lawyers put an end to disputes as they claim that there was evidence for Steven that was not even considered. No blood trails were seen in the examination done in Steven's home. There was no indication of Teresa's body being restrained. It was presumed that Teresa was not killed in Steven's trailer, but in his garage. His defendants wanted the presumption of officers planting evidence to be done. The lawyers did not think that the officers killed Teresa, but they did believe that someone skillfully had led the evidence to Steven. …show more content…

He brings up evidence of Teresa's presence in Steven's trailer the same day she was found dead. A bill of sale and an Auto Trader magazine that belonged to Teresa was found at his residence. He brings back awareness of the bullet that had been found in his garage. When the cartridge was tested, it had Teresa's DNA. Kratz did not want to make the presumption that his officers planted evidence because it would ruin their reputations. Because of this, Kratz was accused of speaking in an unprofessional manner. Furthermore, as the trial approached an end, the juries have their final debate. The board did not come up with an immediate decision, so the court had to wait until the next day to do so. When this court day arrived, one of the jurors had to leave for a family emergency. A substitute juror had to be placed. The trail began. On Count 1, Steven was found guilty. On Count 2, Steven was found not guilty. On Count 3, Steven was not guilty. Due to these results, Steven gets the life

Show More
Related
557 Words | 3 Pages

Bath, N.Y. (WENY) -- Another thorough day of testimony in Michael Beard's murder trial. Monday morning, Brian Lang the owner of ServPro, the company Thomas Clayton worked for, took the stand. He testified to his business relationship with Clayton and GPS tracking in the ServPro vehicles. He said he grew up with Clayton in Binghamton and hired him in January of 2015.

Read More
593 Words | 3 Pages

The smell in the trunk of the car was tested and contained a large amount of chloroform and key compounds of human decomposition. Evidence is evidence but not all evidence is good, but the “smell of death” that was in the trunk could have been used as good evidence to the case. Why? Because they did not have any other good evidence to prove that she killed her daughter, but that one piece of evidence alone could have convicted her of murdering her daughter.

Read More
541 Words | 3 Pages

Steven Avery fights to prove his claimed innocence. Steven claims that "they set him up," when he was investigated and was told that he was not a suspect. The investigation of Teresa's death resulted in finding an essential in Steven's residence, EDTA test being done, and log documentation of officers. When searching Steven's home, a key that linked to Teresa's Rav 4 was found.

Read More
127 Words | 1 Pages

Trayvon Martin was assaulted and shot by George Zimmerman. During the trial visual evidence was used against George Zimmerman. Visual evidence is becoming more and more relevant in these recent trials. The increases use of visual evidence is a definite positive thing, however those who use such evidence should do so wisely. Those who improperly use visual evidence may mislead the jury, and convict/ not convict the right person.

Read More
166 Words | 1 Pages

Not only did Raymond admit to killing her, he told the undercover his strategy which was to deny, deny, deny. The jury listened to these recordings and still decided Raymond was not guilty and failed to show empathy towards her death. Tina's body was found in a garbage bag in Red River, Winnipeg, Manitoba; unfortunately she was only 15. When it comes to the lack of forensic evidence, I think it's

Read More
962 Words | 4 Pages

Hunter Thigpen Ms. Gourd Pre-AP 10 ELA March 27,2018 It’s what's on the inside that counts Steve Harmon, an african american teenager, was an outcast. Along with the horrible burden of segregation, he had to learn how to grow up while dealing with the mistreatment. So Steve is wrongfully accused of a crime ,and he is black and during this time everyone is very racist.so he is gonna experience a very unfair trial.

Read More
1047 Words | 5 Pages

Despite of overwhelming evidence the jury found them not guilty. The jury deliberated only for sixty-seven minutes until they decided there

Read More
835 Words | 4 Pages

This happened because he had it in his head that he would lose the case so he didn’t try his best and an innocent man's life was stripped away from him. PARTIES Members of the jury, the County will review the

Read More
896 Words | 4 Pages

Juror Nine votes not guilty because he admires Juror Eight for standing alone against the majority. Once the jurors start to discuss the case again Juror Seven questions who else would have the motive to kill this boy’s father. Juror Eight rebuts by saying, “As far as I know, we’re supposed to decide whether or not the boy on trial is guilty. We’re not concerned with anyone else’s motives here” (Rose 240).

Read More
432 Words | 2 Pages

At the beginning of the story, juror 7 brought up an idea to vote if the defendant is guilty, which gets the jurors nowhere. He says, "Let’s vote now." Soon after he wonders if they could “all go home" (page 13). Juror number 7 had no intention of testing witnesses because he was hastily trying to jump to the conclusion and ignorant of the other possibilities that could have arisen. Juror 7 also demanded that "this better be fast” because he’s “got tickets to an event."

Read More
842 Words | 4 Pages

Work your hearts out." Juror 3 ends it the story by saying "Now, let's get going.” He got up from the chair and walked away from the side table where he sat to talk with #8 but before going back to his seat to continue looking at the photo. Throughout this scene, you can see that #3 clearly have a poor relationship with his son.

Read More
1552 Words | 7 Pages

The judge presided over the trial and served as a legal expert… The jury heard the events and accused guilty or not-guilty (Is The American Jury System Still A Good Idea?). ” Jury trials should remain an option because because we as Americans have the right of the seventh , jurors are only told 100 percent of proven information, and the jurors are not influenced by media, people, or unproven information to make a decision and the

Read More
866 Words | 4 Pages

The postponement of further proceedings in the trial gave the jury some time to decide whether the boy was going to be convicted of the murder or not. When the jurors gathered to make a decision only one of them voted “not guilty”, making this

Read More
842 Words | 4 Pages

Juror 3 was intimidating the other jurors, trying to convince them to stick with the guilty verdict. Juror 2 was guilty of self-censorship agreeing with the rest of the group to influence his decisions. The whole group began with the illusion of unanimity. According to Janis illusion of unanimity is, “the majority view and judgments are assumed to be unanimous.” (Psysr.org,

Read More
1404 Words | 6 Pages

The script introduces the viewers to the typical behavior and the state of mind of these jurors, who surprisingly turn out to be the last to change their opinions from “guilty” to “not guilty”. Juror#3 the frustrated father whose personal conflicts and experiences influence his view of the accused’s crime is very desperate to make it clear that his mind is already made up before the deliberations even start. Similar

Read More

More about The Evidence Of Steven Avery's Trial

Related Topics

Open Document