ipl-logo

Essay On Judicial Biasness

3000 Words12 Pages

According to the rule of law, courts are better protector of individual liberty. Courts adjudicate dispute and exercise check and balance on the executive. Hence, judiciary independence is the heart of democratic system which earns the confidence of public. While there lacks a written constitution safeguarding judicial independence, the court is protected by various ways such as statute , parliamentary protection and common law. The maxim nemo Judex in causa sua state that no one shall be the judge of his own cause provides the rules against bias. The author will now examine the importance of judicial independence and the approaches of the English Legal System toward the concept of judicial biasness.

1.0 The Roles of Judges
Judges are upholder …show more content…

Hence, it is importance for courts to be impartial and free from the influence by the executive. Independence of judiciary is a “constitutional fundamental” that cannot be trespassed upon by other branches of government. However, previously, Lord Chancellor, seems to be in conflict with the statement. Lord Chancellor, a member of executive, was head of judiciary who can preside over the appellate court of House of Lord. Lord Chancellor was also involved in the selection and appointment of judges which can exert executive influences into judiciary. The possible biasness of judges to rule in line with executive’s ideology can be seen in the 1800s where Lord Halsbury appointed judges with his political allies and reflected that the ruling party could explicitly influence the composition of the bar on ideological lines as illustrated in case law such as London Tramsways v London City Council. Following public pressure and the enactment of HRA 1998, the appointment system has been reformed by Constitutional Reform Act 2005 which shows a greater independence of judiciary. Judicial Appointments Commissions was introduced under S.61 to take over Lord Chancellor’s responsibility in selecting judges. Thereof, candidate will be chosen based on merit and best candidate will be recommended to Lord Chancellor for

Show More
Related
96 Words | 1 Pages

The executive branch includes and is led by the President of the United States of America. Furthermore, this branch also includes the cabinet, executive, and independent agency departments. The President is able to veto the proposition of a new law and designate federal judges and federal posts. The President is also given the power to grant forgiveness to a crime that has been committed. As well as negotiate with foreign countries and treaties about situations and certain topics.

Read More
694 Words | 3 Pages

The Merit Plan Judges in the state of Nevada ascend to their positions through an election by the citizens of Nevada. “In 2007 and 2009, the legislature approved a proposed constitutional amendment calling for merit selection of Nevada judges. ”(JudicialSelection. US) The Merit plan, is a system of appointing judges through bipartisan commissions who forward the lists of shortlisted candidates to the appointing authority to pick from the list.

Read More
681 Words | 3 Pages

Jerry Kang’s Ted Talk and his article “Implicit Bias in the Courtroom” link implicit and explicit bias to attitudes and behaviors. Implicit bias was the primary focus for both, and in his study he was able to measure implicit bases and how if effects behavior by using the Implicit Association Test (IAT). He argues that implicit bias seems to predict to some degree our attitudes and behavior towards other people. In his article, he explains two situation, criminal and civil employment, cases within a courtroom where bias leading up to sentencing, plea deals, hiring, and verdict are all impacted by the implicit bias of the judge and the jury. To begin his argument he demonstrates how police encounters, charging and plea deals, trials, and sentencing are all affected by implicit bias.

Read More
467 Words | 2 Pages

This means that they can’t really be bribed. Document B talks about this when it says, “The judiciary, on contrary, has no influence over either the sword or the purse; no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society;” This is saying that the Judicial Branch has no control over the money or power of the government. For this reason there is really no way for the Judicial Branch to be bribed. This makes their decisions based actually on what they think and not what other people want them to think.

Read More
502 Words | 3 Pages

They cannot act one by themselves. Because of this reason, Judiciary branch is the least threaten to the liberty. However, the Anti Fed concerned the court lack of accountability and are too independent. Therefore, this paper was trying to retort the anti-fed concerns.

Read More
1692 Words | 7 Pages

In a modern sense, proper use of Judicial Independence is important because as it says in, "May it Please The Court," on page 74, law is everywhere in modern America. Thus, Americans use law and courts to resolve disputes that are large and small, public and private. Therefore, you can see how Judicial Independence and legal professions in general are important and critical because it can shape and inform relations between individuals and institutions in this country today, as it has for more than 200 years. Therefore when considering Judicial Independence we must understand the critical aspect and importance it represents with regards to adhering to constitutional thought and or

Read More
509 Words | 3 Pages

Federal Judges and Supreme Court Justices The process for electing a federal judge is both a simple, yet complicated one. A number of things take place between the need for a nominee and the appointment to a position. The basis for the nomination and appointment of federal judges and Supreme Court Justices is the Appointments Clause (Article II, Section 2, Clause 2) of the United States Constitution: “The President...shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law....” First a vacancy must be present at which time the President can make a nomination.

Read More
429 Words | 2 Pages

The Court’s effectiveness relies on the institutional capacities as well as the ruling’s popularity. When lower-court judges comply with Supreme Court decisions, rulings can have a substantial effect on social policies, as in the case

Read More
537 Words | 3 Pages

“There comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular, but he must take it because conscience tells him it is right. ”(Martin Luther King, Jr.) Most people were racist but now since the civil rights have been established most have stopped being racist and moved on. Three supreme court case decisions influenced the civil rights movements by letting more and more poeple know what the Supreme Court was doing to African Americans,and of the unfair him crow laws:(Dred Scott v. Sanford,Plessy v. Ferguson,Brown v. Board of Education). Dred Scott v. Sanford Is a case that most people felt that Dred Scott had an unfair charge against him.

Read More
801 Words | 4 Pages

Judicial selection is an intriguing topic as there are multiple ways that judges take their seat on the bench. The United States Constitution spells out how federal judges are selected and leaves it up to the individual states to establish their means for selecting judges. In federal courts, judges are appointed and it varies between appointment and election for state courts. The purpose of this paper is to examine the differences between appointments and elections (as well as the multiple types of elections) and to give an opinion as to which is the better alternative. Federal judges are appointed by the President of the United States and are confirmed on the advice and consent of the United States Senate.

Read More
1674 Words | 7 Pages

Definition and Description of Procedural Justice Procedural justice is the act involved in decision making. It incorporates the process of involving transparency and fairness in making decisions. The incorporation of justice in this process is equally essential it entails that all parties allowed to give their views before decision are made concerning a given matter. Some theories state that restorative and distributive justice might not be met but for as long as there is a fair and justice procedure, there is always the possibility of having outcomes that are equitable (Jason &Tyler, 2003).

Read More
1268 Words | 6 Pages

[5] Common law works in a different way, the judges rather than the Parliament make common law or ‘judge-made law’. Considering criminal and civil cases, the judges take decisions based on the stare decisis principle (Latin “to stand by things decided”, the legal principle of determining points in litigation according to precedent [4]), deliver rulings and create precedents, thus applying the law to real life situations. Therefore, the value of the precedent is very high in the English Common Law system. The strengths of common law

Read More
755 Words | 4 Pages

Previous studies have shown its implication to the phenomenon of self-serving bias. Showing that cultural differences, degree of relationship, protection of individual’s self-esteem, role of individual, academic achievement, and expectancy are factors that is affected and can affect an individual’s behavior. However, in addressing the question on the explanations of why people display self-serving bias. Some researchers suggest that self-serving bias is driven by their motivation process or they are driven by the manner on how they make judgments (Anderson & Slusher, 1986; Tetlock & Levy, 1982).

Read More
982 Words | 4 Pages

Bias is prejudice about someone or something which has been created based on incomplete information. More often bias has a negative effect as it affects other people, our way of thinking that could be driven into stereotypes frame. Every day we face with a huge number of biases and some of us even do not know about the existence of them. If it gets to that point when something suffers from it, people need to overcome biases. There are a lot of examples of biases in our world.

Read More
702 Words | 3 Pages

No doubt the doctrine of the judicial precedent has proved to be a real advantage to society. However, we cannot neglect the fact that there are some disadvantages associated with this doctrine. 1. The very first disadvantage of this doctrine is the fact that not all the judges will have the same conclusion on a matter; therefore increasing the complexity of a case. Just like human beings differ from each other physically, they also differ mentally.

Read More

More about Essay On Judicial Biasness

Related Topics

Open Document