ipl-logo

Write An Essay On The Judicial Branch

427 Words2 Pages

The judicial branch, consisting of the U.S. courts, is mainly in charge of defining the state/national laws, how to apply them in situations, and regulates if laws are constitutional. Federal judges need to first be nominated by the president, then confirmed by the Senate in a (mostly) disputable process. The Senate wants to make sure all justice leaders approved are fit to rule constitutionally in society. The president is always looking for judges who share their same ideology, and will oversee judicial appointments very carefully because they are a way for him/her to affect public policy long after their presidency term. As a member of the judicial branch, they are commonly known to settle disputes in court, incorporating the laws and people 's constitutional rights. In doing so, they are also a national policymaker. Their opinions and ruling affect how the constitution should be defined in the political system. Published opinions serve as precedents for other federal courts and future Supreme Court decisions. …show more content…

In many cases, peoples ' civil rights have been violated by another person, or the government, and the court 's decision highly affects how the constitution, and government system, is viewed. Leaders have the power to be a sort of referee of the democratic process, and declare what is right/wrong (which isn 't always easy). Everyone 's ideology is different, so many decisions on leadership, justices, and diversity have direct impact on civil rights. It is very important who we, as the people, put into office, because the justice leaders appointed by the president, will likely have a similar mindset and will treat the public as he/she would. If the president has a strong opinion for or against something, the judicial branch could possibly lean in that direction as well, affecting civil rights and civil liberties all

Show More
Related
1365 Words | 6 Pages

All three branches have a purpose in the government and they work together so that they can have a good government without worrying about tyranny. The legislative branch gives all of their power to the Senate and the House of Representatives and they are supposed to make the laws and pass the laws. The Executive branch invests all of their power to the president and vice president, and their job is to enforce the laws. The judicial branch gives all of their power to the Supreme Court, and their job is to explain the laws to the country and make sure that they are Constitutional. They all work together to keep from making a tyranny.

Read More
2120 Words | 9 Pages

There are also no juries or witnesses and it involves only lawyers from both sides that argue the law and answer any questions the judges may have. There are seven judges at this level or one Chief Justice and six judges on the panel. The Chief Justice is elected by the court?s sitting judges and is elected a two-year term. Cases can be appealed to the Supreme Court that were heard in the Circuit Courts or the Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court can override those courts decisions. The Supreme Court?s role is to guarantee a firm and reasonable judicial system and is the final arbitrator in disagreements that involve the state?s constitution and laws.

Read More
882 Words | 4 Pages

The Executive branch executes laws and is the president. The Judicial branch judges laws and is the Supreme Court. The Legislative branch creates laws and is the House of Representatives and Senate. James Madison said in Federalist Paper #47 Document B, “the accumulation of all powers...in the same hands...may be justly pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” This helps protect from tyranny because the Separation of Powers prevents all power from being in the same hands.

Read More
899 Words | 4 Pages

"How Democratic is the American Constitution ?", by political scientist Robert A. Dahl is a short book that questions the ethical and political issues in America 's Constitution and the structure of the United States government. The book consists of a series of abstract lectures composed by Dahl that reflects on how the American Constitution affects modern society. While this short book brings out plentiful knowledge on the American system , it does not go any deeper into those general ideas for it is only about 200 pages. However, it is still a knowledgeable book to introduce the fundamentals of American government and political science and why American citizens should uphold the Constitution. Dahl introduces the book of how the Founding

Read More
533 Words | 3 Pages

Each branch has different job. For instance, the legislative branch passes laws, executive branch enforces laws, and the judicial branch interprets

Read More
970 Words | 4 Pages

This new office would be known as the President of the United States, and one of the powers of the executive branch would be that it had the power to appoint judges to the judiciary branch of the national government. The executive branch judicial appointees would however need to be approved by the upper house known as the Senate. These members of the judiciary branch would serve life terms. The power behind this branch of government was that of interpreting the laws and ensuring that they did not violate the Constitution of the United States. (Brinkley,

Read More
731 Words | 3 Pages

The judicial branch is the Supreme Court. Their main job was to enforce the laws that were made by Congress. and the executive branch is the president of our country. Their job is to carry out the laws that have been made. These three branches of government provided a strong base for the government to pass and enforce laws efficiently, resulting in a thriving

Read More
467 Words | 2 Pages

The argument/famous Supreme Court case Madison vs. Marbury asked us the question should the Judicial Branch be able to declare laws unconstitutional. I think the Judicial Branch should be able to declare a law unconstitutional. I believe this because the judicial branch is very small, they have no other checks on any other branch, and they don’t receive any money. The Judicial Branch is so small.

Read More
1063 Words | 5 Pages

The judicial branch is the branch of government that interprets and applies laws to the states and includes the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court, Adams Judicial Appointments, and the Marbury v. Madison final decision all supported

Read More
566 Words | 3 Pages

In addition, the executive branch was responsible for enforcing or vetoing laws passed by Congress (in addition to its other powers). As for the judiciary, it is responsible for interpreting federal laws and the constitution and for overseeing the decisions made by the federal and state courts. Before when it was unable to address economic and boundary disputes, the judiciary under the constitution was able to address a wide range conflicts. Above all, these three branches of government share equal power to prevent one form of government from becoming too

Read More
679 Words | 3 Pages

To balance out the judicial branch’s power, the legislative branch could change the size of the Supreme Court, commence amendments of the Constitution, and declare inferiority of courts to the Supreme Court. Correspondingly, the executive had much power balancing the other branches’ command, but this branch is famous for executing laws made by the Legislature. Regarding the Legislature, the executive branch had the ability to temporarily suspend appointments, outlaw power, and declare adjournment if, in any case, other houses cannot decide on adjournment. Concerning the Judiciary, the executive branch could employ judges, and this branch also had the power to pardon some crimes. Finally, the Judiciary was also able to hinder the abuse of power of the other two branches of government, and the branch also interpreted the law.

Read More
606 Words | 3 Pages

The constitution was created in order for the country and government to support and protect we the people. The constitution also gives us hope that we are safe and protected in our country. Now for the question, who has the most power in the constitution? I argue that the congress have the most power. The congress is apart of the Legislative branch.

Read More
1490 Words | 6 Pages

Separation of powers protects liberty by making sure that all government powers do not fall in the hands of a single person or a group of people it also ensure that one branch does not exercise the powers of another branch. The legislative branch is mainly responsible for lawmaking, in article one of the constitution congress is granted limited but substantial legislative power. For Example, in section 8 it mentions “congress shall have the power to establish Post offices and Post roads meaning that neither the executive branch nor the Judiciary branch can exercise these powers. The Executive branch is mainly responsible for enforcing laws, Article II of the constitution grants executive power to the President, Some of the president’s powers are to veto legislation, recommend legislation, grant pardons and nominate judges. The Judicial branch is the law interpreting branch of government, article III of the constitution establishes a federal system of courts that are separate from the state courts, judges are appointed for life unless they are impeached and judges are also independent of the other two branches and through their exercise of judicial powers judges cannot be threatened by either the executive or the legislative branch.

Read More
942 Words | 4 Pages

When you think about the word legal, equity rings a bell. Equity groups with decency and rationale, yet lamentably a few subtle elements shield the Judicial branch from being recently that. The legal branch comprises of the courts framework and the debating of the law. The head of particular court frameworks are judges, and these judges are to complete hearings with sacred decency. Unexpectedly, these judges are regularly not chosen into their positions on that same foremost of reasonableness.

Read More
801 Words | 4 Pages

Judicial selection is an intriguing topic as there are multiple ways that judges take their seat on the bench. The United States Constitution spells out how federal judges are selected and leaves it up to the individual states to establish their means for selecting judges. In federal courts, judges are appointed and it varies between appointment and election for state courts. The purpose of this paper is to examine the differences between appointments and elections (as well as the multiple types of elections) and to give an opinion as to which is the better alternative. Federal judges are appointed by the President of the United States and are confirmed on the advice and consent of the United States Senate.

Read More

More about Write An Essay On The Judicial Branch

Related Topics

Open Document