Anthropology offers a distinct point of view on tourism as an element of human culture, where the “main foci of attention are the forces that generate tourists and tourism, the transactions between cultures or subcultures that are an intrinsic part of all tourism, and the consequences for the cultures and individuals within them” (Nash and Smith 1991:22). From a methodological point of view, the holistic, qualitative contribution of anthropology is quite widely recognized by tourism researchers. The interpretive methodology characterizing this field is ethnography, worried with deciphering human behavior in its cultural and social setting. From that point forward, other methodological approaches are bringins interesting experiences into the human sciences of tourism. Organizational and Strategy Research can be can be seen in the middle of interpretive and positivist methodologies, where the interpretive one is a relative newcomer on the scene. These two positions appear to be held to be incommensurable, with positivists requesting for only natural science methods to be applied to research (Daft 1983), while interpretive researchers contend for methodologies, for example, phenomenology, hermeneutics, and ethnography. In the field of exploration, conflict between arranged versus emergent strategic behaviour (Mintzberg and Waters 1985), and about the relationship between structure, strategy, and the environment, has driven creators like Ansoff (1987) to propose a paradigmatic