When Foucault (1977) stated that Panopticism is a system to be used by societies in the future, his prediction was quite correct. With surveillance and counter surveillance in place (Koskela, 2011, p. 272-273), people are being watched everywhere they go, with them not even aware of it most of the times. In the meantime, in this risk society, people nowadays uses a camera phone recording occasions and posting pictures on the Web. Everyone in the world can be an incidental eyewitness, blurring the line between overseers and reporters (Koskela, 2009). Surveillance happens to be everywhere. For example, when a shopper is purchasing something at a shopping store, he or she is being watched to ensure no shoplifting takes place. When driving anywhere, traffic cameras mounted on the roads are recording everything (Koskela, 2003, p. 295). While people are attending sporting events, there is someone checking to ensure that they behave in the appropriate manner. Considering that the panopticon system was initially utilized in a prison setting, it would be correct to argue that humanity is constantly living in a prison-like state. Something is always …show more content…
Its focal points incorporate an arrangement of security and prevent black hats hacking, terrorists, provides data surveillance to the Web and enhances co-ordination. Resulting upon the experts of a surveillance society, some of the impacts that harm the surveillance society are the danger to the protection of people, however, we appear to be more worried about risky situations. While we are in the process, we might neglect the possibility that completely reliant on surveillance technologies for safety could wind up of more damage to us than great (Wu, and Chang, 2016). Surveillance causes the problem such as lacking of trust and generating doubts between people, citizens and the government, by this means for us to control and mindful of our