Public criminology today builds on an important legacy of engaged scholarship. According to Loader and Sparks, ‘’public value of criminology as a democratic under-labouring, lies not simply in ‘cooling’ down controversies about crime and social responses to it so much as in playing its part in figuring out ways to bring their ‘heat’ within practices of democratic governance (http://journal.radicalcriminology.org/index.php/rc/article/view/33/HTML) ( 2010, pp. 779)’’. [CARRIER Shantz, J. and Piche, J. (2014)] Public criminologists are called upon to take into account the ethics of the “democratic under-labourer’’ who is less focused on a collaboration of social forms by reliable knowledge. They set out to enforce better politics of crime and …show more content…
This is evident by its attempts to reduce crime and its problems in a moral way, through criminological knowledge and trying to shape the way in which crime has been apprehended and governed in recent debates (Deflem, 2013 and Titlilec 2004). Overall, public criminology influences contemporary criminology in order to enhance crime regulations and criminological public issues by public debates and dialogues. Currie’s descriptions mentioned that public criminology as a branch of criminology takes a more dynamic, methodical and effective role in the world of social policy and social action (2007, pp.176). Moreover, as we examine public criminology, it is clear that by applying knowledge, it has helped reshape the reward structures of universities in the field of criminology. Furthermore, it has helped to identify some of the limits of current public criminology conversation and proposes several ideas for committing to a critical approach to change. By carrying out research in dialogue with communities and in publicizing knowledge about crime and punishment, it assesses and rebuilds cultural images of crime, criminals and justice (kane ref. tokenurgio). Undoubtedly, public criminology is a helpful and essential part of criminology which offers invaluable insights to public social sciences (Shantz and Piche,