In contrast Brundtland uses the basic needs perspectives. Which merely focus on the provision of basic need for current generation without compromising the abilities of those to follow to meet and satisfy their daily needs (Brundtland, 1987). This definition recognized the dependency of humans on the environment to meet their needs and satisfy their well beings, and this does not only rest alongside exploiting resources but rather also inclusive of the ideas that: “ecology and economy are becoming more and more intertwined – locally, regionally nationally and globally”(Brundtland, 19987:5). In the report Brundtland(1987) shows the significance of the environment in terms of stressing that humanity depend on the environment for security and,meeting their basic needs. However this definition of ‘basic needs ‘ is rather to narrow, even the proponents of it base its concept on weak sustainability thesis.
Poverty play a significant role on sustainability and sustainability also have an impact on poverty. Therefore there are various perspectives in terms on the role poverty
…show more content…
Since it is argued that as environmental degradation intensifies in equally it adversely impact on already disadvantaged people and also inequalities in the human development amplify environmental degradation. Therefore the poor cannot, and must not be blamed for hindering sustainability(Klugman, 2011). However this discussion does not disregard the idea that the poor can also play a role in degradation or hindering