Freedom Of Press Limitations

799 Words4 Pages

Freedom of press and freedom of speech must be subject to some form of statutory regulation
The question about freedom of press and freedom of speech is currently controversial due to the active technology development and the huge amount of available information. One issue is that information is power that has a positive influence on the society and is an effective mechanism in strengthening of social evolution. On the other hand, information can be misused and follow the negative social consequences. Furthermore, there is no clear definition of a freedom of speech, it is vaguely and many-sided. This essay will research these arguments and argue that the freedom of press and freedom of speech need to be under government control.
There are …show more content…

Pay attention to people’s freedom of speech rights induces more thinking generation. Social evolution can cause. People do not feel latent dissatisfaction which can bring the society to impaired stability within a nation (A Level Assistant, 2008). However, a considerable amount of people are overloaded with information and just cannot imagine what to do with it. And then lost people might do a lot of nonsense.
In opposite of this argument, freedom of press and freedom of speech can cause social negative consequences, for instance the current situation in Ukraine. According to the Vesti.ru(2014), the plane of Malaysian Airlines crashed on 17th July. The wrong information about airspace security was given by Ukraine that is why the tragedy has happened. …show more content…

You are free to think what you like and express your thoughts. The marketplace of ideas – a consequence of freedom of speech – relies upon this. Everyone says what they like and may the best idea/argument win. However, that being said, there are some limitations on free speech that are universally accepted in domestic and international jurisprudence. Namely the exceptions of defamation (lying about someone for gain and/or profit) and incitement language (encouraging others to violence or panic).” (The consequences of Free Speech, 2012)
Indeed, the limits are permitted, but they are not concretized, that allows freedom of press and speech to expose its flip side that encourages a negative impact on society such as civil disorders.
To sum up the issues, the completely freedom of press and speech allow the society to move to the next stage of social evolution due to political, artistic and commercial expressions – the society become more rational. In opposite of the counter-arguments, misuse of information can cause the negative consequences within society. Moreover, the definition of freedom of press and speech is vaguely and sometimes people cannot understand which kind of information can be expressed. Therefore, none of the counter-arguments is strong and I support the concept that the freedom of speech and freedom of press has to be under