ipl-logo

The Myth Of Sustainable Organic Eating

1696 Words7 Pages

Like most of the world population, I ate meat for the majority of my life. There seemed to be nothing wrong or harmful about eating meat because everyone around me consumed it on a daily basis as well. However, at the age of fifteen I stumbled across environmental issues that were a result of animal agriculture. I became aware of the damage that I was doing to the environment by choosing to eat meat. This made me question my dietary choices; ultimately, it led me to adopt an environmentally friendly plant based diet. The production of meat has a negative impact on the environment due to habitat destruction, greenhouse gasses and inefficient use of natural resources. With these factors taken into consideration, animal agriculture is not worth …show more content…

It is impossible for the world to feed all cows grass, because there is a growing demand for meat. Also, there would be little to no land to grow crops for humans. Unfortunately, this means that the world now relies on large scale animal agriculture production otherwise known as factory farming. Livestock is raised in large amounts which increases the risk of “mad cow, E. coli and salmonella” (“The Myth of Sustainable Meat”). On top of draining the world’s natural resources, animal agriculture practices put our health at risk. When raising livestock at such a large scale there is no room for sanitation, because the priority is producing the most amount of meat possible. Others argue that animal agriculture has been around from the beginning of the human race; therefore, it must not have any major environmental impacts. However, this is untrue because the world population has grown and “the overall demand for meat has increased five-fold” (“Is Meat Sustainable”). Meat is produced at a larger scale than it was hundreds of years ago, so more resources are required to produce larger amounts of meat. An argument can be made that a “cow produces up to 70 kg of manure per day, providing enough fertilizer in a year for one hectare of wheat” (“Steps to Sustainable Livestock”). While manure can be used as a fertilizer, it releases harmful greenhouse gasses like methane which is associated with climate change. A counterargument to this fact could be that cows would still release greenhouse gasses even if they were not killed for their meat. While this is true, the fact is that there would not be as many cows in the world if large scale animal

Show More
Related
699 Words | 3 Pages

Is eating meat a detrimental threat to the environment? This debate over meat’s involvement in the global warming crisis was what inspired Nicolette Hahn Niman to write, “The Carnivore’s Dilemma.” Niman hoped writing, “The Carnivore’s Dilemma,” would cause her audience to understand that eating meat, raised on traditional farms, was a superior alternative to vegetarianism. Niman supported her claim by explaining how industrialized farms and vegetarians produce more of the three greenhouse gases that caused global warming, than that produced by traditional farms. Niman’s article fell short of being effective due to flaws in her supporting evidence and conclusion.

Read More
1766 Words | 8 Pages

Ever since the beginning of time, meat has been a staple of the human diet. People have many reasons why they chose not to consume meat. One of the most common reasons some people chose not to eat meat is because they believe that it is unethical. There are many processes required in order to produce meat for conception, and these processes have become widely known to the public and cause a great deal of controversy. Animals are often tortured, genetically modified, and live in squalid conditions before they become the meat we put on our dinner tables.

Read More
1054 Words | 5 Pages

The U.S. agricultural industry can now produce unlimited quantities of meat and grains at remarkably cheap prices. But it does so at a high cost to the environment, animals and humans”

Read More
248 Words | 1 Pages

The Pro side of this debate is written by Wayne Madsen. He argues that eating less meat would help protect the environment. Mr. Madsen says that the way animals we use for food are being raised is hurting the atmosphere.

Read More
795 Words | 4 Pages

Pollan claimed, “After a few weeks rest, the pasture will regrow and feed the cows again”. (171) This demonstrates that farmers don’t feed food that animals aren’t recognizable to at local sustainable companies. Ultimately every food chain has a unique process to raise their animals. But locally sustainable food chains have the best way to approach their food system because they do it in a procedure that will not harm the animals.

Read More
506 Words | 3 Pages

Kip Anderson of the movie documentary “Cowspiracy” shares a UN study states that the meat and dairy industries, and factory farming currently taking place on the planet emit more fossil fuels into the atmosphere than our entire transportation sector, including cars, boats, trains, planes. The study claims that as much as 18% of greenhouse gas emissions come from animal agriculture, while transportation exhaust totals 13% of all emissions. These emissions are split between three main contributors: carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide, and methane gases. With each gas, animals emissions comes out as a leading contributors with 51%, 32 billion tons, of CO2, 65% of nitrous oxide, and 26% of methane gas emissions directly or indirectly from our

Read More
745 Words | 3 Pages

Experts recommend that adults eat just over half a pound of meat per week to help reduce their risk for diseases such as diabetes, heart disease, and/or strokes. “We don’t eat animal products for sufficient nutrition, we eat them to have an odd form of malnutrition, and It’s killing us” (Bittman). There’s a simple way to reduce not only our calorie intake, but our carbon footprint as well: “less meat, less junk food, more plants” (Bittman). While Bittman makes some very compelling points about how much of the meat we produce and subsequently waste, he fails to take into account the affordability of meat because of it’s mass production, as well as the simple facts that most people lack the time needed to produce meals with fruits and

Read More
484 Words | 2 Pages

With climate change and global warming taking a toll on Earth, the environment is deteriorating: Droughts and heat waves are frequent, natural disasters are intensified, and the temperature continues to rise. Thus, the leading causes of climate change need to be examined and changes need to be executed to salvage the Earth and save it from being slowly uninhabitable. While there are many approaches to the issue, promoting a non-beef diet is the best approach in decreasing carbon dioxide that contributes to climate change and global warming. The production of beef requires significantly more resources than other meat such as chicken and pork.

Read More
301 Words | 2 Pages

Furthermore, 51% of total greenhouse gas emissions is derived from animal agriculture. Moreover, red meat is a very inefficient means to produce food because of the amount of

Read More
825 Words | 4 Pages

This documentary unfairly stated that cattle is the sole factor of our world’s environmental issues because they emit greenhouse gases and over-consume water. However, in reality they are not the only ones who are using water, creating greenhouse gas, and affecting the land and ocean. Our planet is facing a lack of water, and according to the documentary, the cows are one of the major causes of this. If the problem is water waste, then look at how we, the people, are using it. Almost everybody uses water to shower, wash dishes, and flush toilets everyday.

Read More
1138 Words | 5 Pages

Since the animals carry diseases and we are eating it, human health has potentially decreased due to the increase of disease being spread. Additionally, factory farms are having negative impacts on our environment. “Hog, chicken, and cattle waste has polluted 35,000 miles of rivers in 22 states and contaminated groundwater in 17 states” (Organic Consumers Association). It is shown how these factory farms are contaminated the land around us due to the waste produced by these animals and the unsanitary dispose of such

Read More
768 Words | 4 Pages

In today’s world, there is a division among the people in the world regarding whether or not it is ethical to eat meat. After researching about eating meat and vegetarianism, I have come to the conclusion that it is indeed ethical to eat meat in today’s society. Sure, eating meat might have its drawbacks, but I have found that the benefits of eating meat far outweigh the negatives of eating it. Eating meat not only helps improve people’s health, but it also helps strengthen our economy and it has little difference in the environmental impact that involves in the farming of vegetables. Eating too much of anything usually results in a negative outcome.

Read More
1421 Words | 6 Pages

Eating meat is beneficial to humanity, because they provide nourishment that cannot be obtained from other sources. Without the support of animals, humans lack a distinctive diet, that is essential to their well-being. However, since animals are so important to the diet, they deserve great care and respect as well. Humans were always hunters and gathers. They always knew that meat was a big source of protein that helped keep them going(Araki).

Read More
734 Words | 3 Pages

Veganism is a foolproof method to provide the answers the Earth needs, especially as the world’s population continues its inefficient and environmentally damaging methods of energy usage. People tend to focus on the political sides of climate change, however, the biggest problem the world faces in energy consumption is not transportation emissions but is how we go about out food systems and daily food choices. Evidence has surfaced about how daily food choices impact the climate severely. According to an assessment by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, the livestock sector of global greenhouse gases surpassed that of transportation.

Read More
1235 Words | 5 Pages

Also, ubiquitous vegetarians negatively affect the environment. Hence, a regular diet consisting of meat outclasses vegetarianism in health and environmental impacts. To go along with poor personal health, vegetarianism negatively affects the health of the environment and endanger the lives of other organisms. For starters, David Pimentel and Marcia Pimentel from the “American Journal of Clinical Nutrition” states, “about 90% of US cropland suffers from topsoil loss at 13 times the sustainable rate” (qtd.

Read More

More about The Myth Of Sustainable Organic Eating

Related Topics

Open Document