The Neutrality Act Of 1939 Dbq Essay

532 Words3 Pages

Due to Germany’s takeover of France, Britain’s need for help against Germany, and ending with Japanese aggression on Pearl Harbor, most of the isolationist vibes conceded and the United States fully intervened in foreign affairs and war. Britain began to run out of money, and Roosevelt, not wanting debts, came up with the lend-lease program, in which arms and ships that the US lent to the Allies would be returned when they are no longer needed, although food was also sent under this program (Doc I). This represented a full abandonment of neutrality, with 50 billion dollars worth of arms and equipment being sent to Britain in hopes of turning the war. Additionally, the Atlantic Conference, to illustrate neutral America losing neutrality, was …show more content…

In a change from the London Conference, which America took no part in, the Atlantic Conference displayed the United States’ change towards deciding the outcomes of the world. FDR agreed for escorts to ensure arm distribution to Britain, since destroyers like the Greer, the Kearny, and the Reuben James were attacked by Germans. Congress annulled the Neutrality Act of 1939 in 1941, since the neutrality act no longer was needed due to America’s full-on intervention, which climaxed at Japan’s strike at Pearl Harbor. Roosevelt proclaimed the day as “a date which will live in infamy”, and the US declares the war on Japan, reflecting the disputed portion of the Public Opinion Polls, that if it became necessary to enter the war against Germany, the vote was split half in favor and half against (Doc E). The necessity to end Germany and Japan became imminent, as the event of the attack on Pearl Harbor, killing or injuring 3,000 US men, sparked a passion in Americans, who became infuriated and wanted to go to