The New Perspective On Paul Summary

For Centuries the interpretations of Paul’s letters have been centered on them apparently being of Judaist works and legalistic. Kent L. Yinger’s 105-page book, The New Perspective on Paul: An Introduction, Yinger studies the history of NPP via E.P Sanders 1977 publication of Paul and Palestinian Judaism: A comparison of Patterns of Religion. He details Sanders views and main arguments of NPP in the book since these are what laid the groundwork for the new perspective. He uses historical background and an outline format in each chapter as a method to illustrate new aspects to the perspective of Paul. Yinger, who is pro-NPP, attempts to introduce these topics in lame terms to prevent confusion and create clarity in understanding the new

Where did it come from? What are the potential Dangers? and, What good is it? The answers to these questions are found in chapters of the book where Yinger provides historical background. He supports his main points by using contributions from E.P Sanders, N.T. Whright and J. D.G. Dunn who help in listing and understanding “covenantal nomism” in the second chapter. Covenantal nomism is a way Sanders categorizes his issues towards traditional representations or claims that Judaism was overly legalistic. It is simply defined by Gods’ plan in the covenant and the requirement of proper response by humanity. Sanders analysis of Jewish practice was that humans are obliged to God and God has grace and forgiveness for them. In the third chapter, we are introduced to the articulating views J.D.G. Dunn has of the new perspective. With careful description Yinger details how Dunn shaped most of the beginning of what is known of the New Perspective of Paul. Dunn argues that Pauls’ writings were not just about “works of the law” that practices did not provide Jews with their Jewish identity. Instead Dunn opposed this idea and argued that Paul was saying that some cultic practices were no longer

Writght’s variations on Dunn’s views. Wright’s new addition to the Pauline Perspective is known as the Sanders-Dunn-Wright trajectory which is outlined and titled “main lines.” Do not misunderstand this outline as an agreement on all subjects and views regarding Paul and Judaism. In fact Yinger introduces more “perspectives” from advocates such as Francis Watson’s sociological theory where he argues Paul had more interests in saving faith in the Gentiles than having debates of theology. Heikki Raisanen’s claims that a non-systematic approach is more helpful in understanding Paul’s stance on social location and identity. Each provides support for each view, whether it was pro or against theological legitimations, coherent theology or simple new Christian