Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The perils of indifference by elie wiesel introduction paragraph
The perils of indifference by elie wiesel introduction paragraph
The perils of indifference Elie Wiesel
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Alexis Barton Mrs. Turner English 2 Honors 4/14/22 [Title]: [Subtitle] Over 6 million Jews tragically died in the Holocaust. Elie Wiesel was fortunate enough to survive it. He suffered greatly and still continued his life as an educator and as an advocate for those involved in the Holocaust. Elie Wiesel gave the speech “The Perils of Indifference,” and used ethos, pathos, and loaded words throughout the speech as strategies to keep the audience actively listening.
American Jewish writer, and political activist Elie Wiesel, in his sympathetic speech “The Perils of Indifference” to send a strong message to the audience. As a survivor of the Holocaust, he supports his claim through his speech explaining the dangers of indifference from first hand experience. Specifically in his speech he refers to himself, “A young Jewish boy [..] woke up in a place of eternal infamy called Buchenwald”(par 1).. In addition, Wiesel use of rhetorical questions is for the audience to question or to think about indifference. Wiesel’s purpose is to warn people about indifference in order to “save” our future.
Holocaust survivor and author of the novel, Night, Elie Wiesel in his speech, “The Perils of Indifference,” claims that indifference is not only a sin, but is an act of dehumanization. He begins to develop his claim by defining the word indifference, then enlightens the audience about his personal experiences living through the war, and finally asks the audience how they will change as they enter a new millennium. Wiesel’s purpose throughout his speech is to convince his audience not to be indifferent to those who were and are being treated cruelly and unjustly. He creates tones of guardedness , disappointment, abandonment, and hopefulness in order for his audience to see his perspective during the horrific times of the war.
Elie Wiesel’s “The Perils of Indifference” uses pathos, loaded words, and rhetorical questions to persuade his audience that one must act when they see injustice, suffering, or unfair treatment. The use of pathos in “The Perils of Indifference” persuades the audience that one must act when they see injustice. “He was finally free, but there
He also inform the audience about the indifference that happened during the holocaust .Elie wiesel uses another rhetorical questioning to start off his second main idea and to bring the audience attention to what he is about to point out. In his speech he said, “ what is indifference?” To make the listener ask themselves do they really know what the meaning of indifference is referring to the event. He also use the technique of comparing and contrasting by stating “more dangerous than anger and hatred”.
Holocaust Survivor Elie Wiesel delivered a powerful speech titled “The Perils of Indifference” in which he expressed his disapproval of those who chose to ignore the suffering of others. he uses personal stories, historical truth, and a call to action, as well as ethos, logos, pathos, and repetition. Elie highlighted the fact that indifference can be more harmful than any other emotion or feeling of humans. his speech was a strong reminder of the consequences of our indifference and a call to action to make a difference in the world. Eli uses ethos in his speech when he constantly says “us” and “we” because it originated from his personal experience and others' experiences.
Samuel Boren Block English II Honors 21 April 2023 An Analysis of “The Perils of Indifference” History scholars often ask how a tragedy as egregious as the Holocaust could have possibly happened. Why didn’t anyone stand up for Jewish people? In his speech, Eliezer Wiesel, a survivor of the Holocaust, argues it was due to indifference. He aims to raise awareness by speaking out about this dangerous mentality.
In the “Perils of Indifference” speech Elie Wiesel persuades his readers to understand that no one should ever be judged for being different from others. During Wiesel's speech he was explaining when he woke up one morning close to an internal infamy called Buchenwald where he was free and no longer felt joy; he never would again. “In a way indifference to the suffering is what makes the human being inhuman.” This quote shows that Wiesel thinks that indifference is a sin, and that indifference is worse than hatred. Wiesel came from a place where society was composed of the killers, victims, and bystanders, of which he was a victim of indifference.
According to Elie Wiesel, our sorrow and suffering are little in compared to the apathy with which we have not responded. The fact that we choose to ignore other people's pain shows that the problem of indifference will never be overcome. As a child, Wiesel observed horrific injustices that inspired him to not only teach people about indifference, but also to show them the risks of indifference's anguish and despair. “Indifference, after all, is more dangerous than anger or hatred.(Wiesel)”This comment also helps him comprehend apathy since he utilizes words like "hate" to make his audience feel wounded in some way because no one appreciates being a target. Wiesel used rhetorical questions and references to make his point relatable to every individual in his audience, making his address clear, dependable, and, most importantly, pleasant by putting the audience in his shoes and the shoes of those who have suffered as a result of apathy.
During the Holocaust, six million men, women, and children were tortured and died. In the autobiography, “Nights” by Elie Wiesel he describes his experience being in the camps of torture during the Holocaust. Indifference is a main theme throughout the book and the Holocaust however, indifference can cause coldness in others and within themselves. Indifference shows how others make people not believe in themselves, giving up on things people love, and refusal of care.
American Jewish writer, professor, political activist, and Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel speaks with passion and truth in his speech, “The Perils of Indifference” (April 12, 1999), argues that indifference is the worst trait a person can conceive due to its intolerable traits as well as telling America of its mistakes during World War II. He supports his claim by first thanking his audience for rescuing him in the concentration camps and allowing him into this country, then teaches his audience the true meaning of indifference, then confronts the U.S. government in a calm manner for their mistakes during the war, and finally finishes his speech with refreshing the idea of indifference and why it is so important. Wiesel’s purpose is to identify
James Boyce Ms.Whitt Stem Sophomore Honors English 24 May 2023 Choosing Not to be Indifferent With great injustice comes greater indifference. The speech given by Elie Wiesel called “The Perils of Indifference” touches on the Indifference of certain governments during the holocaust. He himself suffered greatly from this indifference of international powers as he was one of the people found in a concentration camp at the end of the war. Indifference suffered him to this injustice, so it must be bad.
Near The end of the twentieth century, writer and Nobel laureate, Elie Wiesel gave his speech “The Perils of Indifference” as a part of the millennium lecture series. And through his anaphora, diction, and rhetorical statements; he conveys his message of the negative effects indifference has on the individual and society. Through his referencing some of the things he experienced during The Holocaust.
Wiesel pinpoints the indifference of humans as the real enemy, causing further suffering and lost to those already in peril. Wiesel commenced the speech with an interesting attention getter: a story about a young Jewish from a small town that was at the end of war liberated from Nazi rule by American soldiers. This young boy was in fact himself. The first-hand experience of cruelty gave him credibility in discussing the dangers of indifference; he was a victim himself.