ipl-logo

The Perks Of Being A Wallflower: Book Censorship

704 Words3 Pages

The Perks of Being a Wallflower Book Censorship is an argument that many people may come across, because of differing viewpoints. There was a Supreme Court case in 1982 where people said that if they removed books from public school libraries violates the First Amendment if the school actually would deny the students the right to access new ideas. The Pico case is by far the most important court decision that talks about school libraries and people’s right to the First Amendment. Throughout the years, certain aspects have changed when it comes to book banning. Nowadays, if a member of a certain community, school board member, or parent doesn’t agree with the book being in the school or public library, they can “challenge” that specific book. Most of the time, books are challenged because they contain bad language or violence, sex, homosexuality, witchcraft, or racist or sexist language. …show more content…

It was about a kid that was a little bit of an outcast, you could say, named Charlie. After Charlie lost one of his best friends, Michael, he was basically alone. He ended up meeting two more friends, Sam and Patrick, that ended up being the best friends he has ever had. Those three went everything together and did everything together. It was all fun and games until Charlie started catching feelings for Sam, more than friend feelings. Patrick was gay, and that is one of the reason why the book has been challenged so many times. Charlie was going through trouble ever since his favorite Aunt Helen died, and he was just very emotionally unstable throughout the whole

Show More
Related
1535 Words | 7 Pages

Parents were going into schools demanding books be taken off the shelves because of language, sexuality and “lack of moral.” Book banning satisfied their need to feel in control of their kids lives. I found myself at the center of the storm, said Judy. Her books were being challenged daily, often put on restricted shelves.

Read More
1029 Words | 5 Pages

Some books were banned not because of content but they were banned for the accuracy of the content which leads to the over arching question that is

Read More
1091 Words | 5 Pages

The board then removed the books claiming they were “anti-American” and that it was the board’s duty to protect their children from moral danger as well as physical and mental ones (FindLaw). Of course, this angered some students so much that some of them -- most notably Steven Pico -- decided to take it to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. At the district court, the defendants argued that since “the books offended their [the board’s/PONYU] social, political, and moral tastes and not

Read More
489 Words | 2 Pages

In the article,”How Banning Books Marginalizes Children” the author Paul Ringel brings attention to an event called, “Banned Books Week” which has been occurring every year since 1982. This week gives prominence to “literary works frequently challenged by parents, schools and libraries” (Ringel 1) due to the context that relates to violence, religion, offensive language or the mentioning of drug use. 52 percent of the books that are obliged to be challenged in Ringel's opinion includes material that delivers “diverse content--which explores issues such as race, religion, gender identity, sexual orientation, mental illness, and disability” (1). Ringel believes books that create controversy and forces the reader to explore should not be banned, because it “end(s) up marginalizing the lives and experiences of many young readers, rather than protecting them” (2) from diverse content.

Read More
668 Words | 3 Pages

Books are banned for various reasons including religious views, racial themes, alternative lifestyles, profanity, sex, violence, negativity, witchcraft, and political views. Banned books even include holy books, like The Bible or The Quran. Even children’s books have been banned; like Green Eggs and Ham by Doctor Suess. Some studies show that making a chapter, or even an entire book challenged is a much more effective way to get kids to read it, rather than making it homework. Even though people challenge books, we do have the right to read what we want.

Read More
1800 Words | 8 Pages

Many claims have been made stating that sexual content, offensive language, and unsuitable for all ages are reasons some books shouldn’t be on shelves. Censorship is continuing to affect authors each and every day,

Read More
233 Words | 1 Pages

Would you rather read a book of your choice or read a book that has been banned. ”Often challenges are motivated by a desire to protect children from “inappropriate” sexual content or “offensive” language. The following were the top three reasons cited for challenging materials as reported to the Office of Intellectual Freedom: content was considered to be sexually explicit, contained offensive language, and the materials were unsuited to any age group.” Banned books give people a sense of curiosity and excitement, which is why more and more people want to read banned books; to see what the hype was about.

Read More
316 Words | 2 Pages

Each book that is banned due to its content are for reasons, such as racial issues, violence, negativity,

Read More
2745 Words | 11 Pages

The reasons those books were challenged is because the topics of homosexuality, suicide, being sexually explicit, drugs/smoking/alcohol, and being unsuited for the age group. (2014 Books Challenges Infographic) To define it, book censorship is the official examination and suppression of certain books or parts of books that some deem to be unacceptable. (Censorship in Young Adult Literature

Read More
1750 Words | 7 Pages

Books can create portals to different life experiences and encourage reading. A few schools and libraries have challenged the educational value of some books, however, therefore leading them to eventually be prohibited in a particular place. Each reason may be different depending on the book and the location of the exclusions. Books are icons of literature and their value should outshine the occasionally offensive topic. Be that as it may, there are multiple reasons why books should be taught and included in a curriculum.

Read More
1235 Words | 5 Pages

“Let readers be leaders” is the motto of Martha Hickinson, a school librarian who after hearing completely compelling and false statements about books at a school board meeting rallied and gathered around four hundred other people against the ban to speak out. There were speeches by adults and even students, and the fight dragged on where Hickinson received an immense amount of hate but in the end, the book was restored. This is a demonstration of how one person can change a lot. Overall, book banning is an ongoing issue happening right now. It is not only happening in schools, but at a national level.

Read More
709 Words | 3 Pages

“American citizens who care about the improvement of education are urged to join students, teachers, librarians, administrators, boards of education, and professional and scholarly organizations in support of the students’ right to read” (The Students Right to Read). Citizens should be allowed to stand up if they believe books should not be banned. It is important that writers should be able to have their books out to the public without getting banned. “Challengers often employ a definition that maintains that banning materials is the only true form of censorship,”(Knox 740). Censorship of books is common and a real problem.

Read More
880 Words | 4 Pages

“over 1500 books are challenged becuase of “explisit” sexcual content..” (“Banned and challenged books by the numbers”).(12 infographics about banned and challenged books). Books are one of the best sources for information Kids are missing out on the great quality of books that have/will be banned. “Parents who don 't like specific books can have their kids "opt out" of an assignment without infringing on the rights of others. The National Coalition against Censorship explained that "Even books or materials that many find 'objectionable ' may have educational value, and the decision about what to use in the classroom should be based on professional judgments and standards, not individual preferences." [6] In the 1982 Supreme Court ruling on Board of Education v. Pico, Justice Brennan wrote that taking books off of library shelves could violate students ' First Amendment rights, adding that "Local school boards may not remove books from school libraries simply because they dislike the ideas contained in those books."

Read More
709 Words | 3 Pages

“American citizens who care about the improvement of education are urged to join students, teachers, librarians, administrators, boards of education, and professional and scholarly organizations in support of the students’ right to read” (The Students Right to Read). Citizens should be allowed to stand up if they believe books should not be banned. It is important that writers should be able to have their books out to the public without getting banned. “Challengers often employ a definition that maintains that banning materials is the only true form of censorship,”(Knox 740). Censorship of books is common and a real problem.

Read More
609 Words | 3 Pages

At one point in time, over 7,220 books have been challenged to be banned. Though these books have been removed for the safety of children, not all books should be banned for many reasons. These include the fact that banning books is infringing on the First Amendment, keeping children from understanding the real world, and, even though there are many reasons for book banning, not banning books could help a student’s education and can even work against itself. Banning a book from a school or public library could go against a person’s First Amendment of the freedom of press.

Read More

More about The Perks Of Being A Wallflower: Book Censorship

Related Topics

Open Document