ipl-logo

The Perks Of Being A Wallflower: Book Censorship

704 Words3 Pages

The Perks of Being a Wallflower Book Censorship is an argument that many people may come across, because of differing viewpoints. There was a Supreme Court case in 1982 where people said that if they removed books from public school libraries violates the First Amendment if the school actually would deny the students the right to access new ideas. The Pico case is by far the most important court decision that talks about school libraries and people’s right to the First Amendment. Throughout the years, certain aspects have changed when it comes to book banning. Nowadays, if a member of a certain community, school board member, or parent doesn’t agree with the book being in the school or public library, they can “challenge” that specific book. Most of the time, books are challenged because they contain bad language or violence, sex, homosexuality, witchcraft, or racist or sexist language. …show more content…

It was about a kid that was a little bit of an outcast, you could say, named Charlie. After Charlie lost one of his best friends, Michael, he was basically alone. He ended up meeting two more friends, Sam and Patrick, that ended up being the best friends he has ever had. Those three went everything together and did everything together. It was all fun and games until Charlie started catching feelings for Sam, more than friend feelings. Patrick was gay, and that is one of the reason why the book has been challenged so many times. Charlie was going through trouble ever since his favorite Aunt Helen died, and he was just very emotionally unstable throughout the whole

Open Document