The Persuasive Essay Of Banning Books

Some people believe that books should be banned because they believe it ti unsuitable or inappropriate for others. Even though some people think that they have no right to decide what others can and can not read. So banning books should not be allowed because people should have the right to choose what they can and can not read. For example, banning books would be taking away a person’s first amendment. Another example is, that just because some people do not agree or believe something a book is about is appropriate does not mean they should get banned. Finally another example, that books that someone does not agree with or like should get banned because of that reason and that reason only. When books are being banned it goes against the

For example, “And yet the ALA views parental challenges to these books as being somehow akin to book-burnings and government censorship, as if there were no legitimate reason why a group of parents might not want their children reading novels which gratuitous and epilict sex, violence, drug use, and the like other major elements of the story (Text 2). This shows that parents want some books banned because their kids are too young for some of the books that they read, but that is not the school or library’s fault because the parents can not allow their kids to read the books instead of trying to get all the books banned like that. Another example from the text is, “It isn’t censorship, to teach our children that they can’t trust their teachers or librarians to give them good, wholesome books. It’s just the fallout from our fractured culture, which insists on calling evil, good and then handing it to our children” (Text 2). This shows that people believe that is it the schools or libraries give children books that are not appropriate for their age but that is not true the school or library would not give a child a book if it was not appropriate for their age