The Controversy Of Banning Books In Schools

Opponents may say that books should be banned. However,the reality is that they should not be banned. The reason being is because it can be a violation of the First Amendment, it can limit a persons education, and banning books can also restrict ideas.

You know that most libraries ban books based on their content.Media censorship is when a piece of media gets banned or changed because of how inappropriate the content is. Book banning can be a debatable topic because people view this topic on different sides.there are people who want to ban books based on their content but there are some people who feel like books should not be banned no matter what content they show.some people argue that banning books based on their content should not be

In an article by Morgan Gilbard titled “What you need to know about the book bans sweeping the U.S” it states “discretion must be exercised in a manner thatabides with the transcendent imperatives of the first amendment.” It also states “The first amendment hinges on the existence of evidence that books are banned for political reasons and violate freedom of expression.” This evidence demonstrates that banning books can violate the first amendment because it takes away the freedom/ability of being able to read what you want to read. Furthermore, it will not only violate the freedom of being able to read what you want, it also violates the freedom of expression. Thus, banning books based on their content can violate the First Amendment mainly because it violates the freedom of

One reasoning is from an article by Harold Jackson titled “Mistake to ban mockingbird” that states “school districts have been banning the novel that takes on racial prejudice.” However, this claim is less convincing because banning books can restrict our ideas of what we want to write. For example, this argument is undermined by an article titled “Book bans are really about oppression of diverse ideas” by Minerva Canto, which argues that books should not be banned because it states “Banning books is not just about removing certain reading material from school and library shelves, but about restricting ideas.” This example can prove that banning books can restrict our ideas because it can restrict our artistic freedom and freedom of speech. Therefore, the counterclaim that books can show racial or even say racial content, is less convincing because it can restrict our artistic