ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of A Hydrogen Bomb

1021 Words5 Pages

The first test of a Hydrogen bomb also known as a fusion bomb immediately vaporized the island, it was tested on and left a mile wide crater. A Hydrogen fusion bomb is an atomic bomb made from nuclear isotopes of trinitan and deuterium. A neutron is fired at a nuclei and adds to the weight of the bomb, causing a chain reaction of exploding. The effects of a Hydrogen bomb are extensive. History shows this because when the first hydrogen bomb was tested it vaporized the island immediately and left nothing but a crater. Like all nuclear bombs the hydrogen bomb leads to nuclear fallout. The H bomb has never been used in warfare, but has been used for many tests. Hydrogen bombs or any fusion bomb should be banned in warfare because the nuclear fallout is damaging to human organs and we are exposed to fallout all the time, in addition the power and force of this bomb …show more content…

Hogan 's notes it is stated clearly that we can control fission bombs which is where you have an element and brealit apart, but fusion bombs where we have a small element and we make it bigger we cannot control. This shows that scientists are messing with things that are uncontrollable which can lead to dangerous outcomes and mankind is unaware of the drastic damages we can do to our world. According to the website “How Stuff Works” it states that “Fusion bombs are also dangerous because they are 700 times more powerful than the little boy bomb which is a fission bomb.” This is another reason the H bomb should be banned since government officials have these weapons and the use of them it is highly dangerous. This amount of power should not be able to be used by anyone since its ending outcome, but not intended outcome is the slow extinction of mankind. Because the Hydrogen bomb is so deadly it should be banned. If we continue to use the Hydrogen bomb we will continue to be at risk of nuclear fallout and human extinction as well as nuclear

Show More
Related
761 Words | 4 Pages

hydrogen bomb or H-bomb, weapon inferring an extensive bit of its vitality from the atomic combination of hydrogen isotopes. In a nuclear bomb, uranium or plutonium is part into lighter components that together weigh not exactly the first iotas, the rest of the mass showing up as vitality. Not at all like this splitting bomb, the hydrogen bomb capacities by the combination, or joining together, of lighter components into heavier components. The deciding item again weighs not as much as its parts, the distinction afresh showing up as vitality. Since to a great degree high temperatures are required with a specific end goal to start combination responses, the hydrogen bomb is otherwise called an atomic bomb.

Read More
690 Words | 3 Pages

In 1945, Japan was losing World War Two, but was split between surrendering or fighting till the end. As they chose to fight instead of surrender, that is when Harry Truman was notified about the successful test of the “most terrible bomb in history”. Multiple hours were spent doing research, and billions of dollars were used for its production. Since an atomic bomb is serious the heat released in a nuclear explosion creates a sphere of burning gas that can range from hundreds of feet. Since Harry Truman was president at the time it was his decision whether or not he was going to use the bomb to end the war.

Read More
627 Words | 3 Pages

When America got that warning, they began to work on an atomic bomb, making progress at a rapid rate (Carnes, Garraty, pg. 727). The first successful bomb explosion occurred in Alamogordo,

Read More
1207 Words | 5 Pages

The United States wanted to increase their amount and strength of the atomic bomb, like the ones used in japan in WWII. While the americans were in the support of the development of the atomic bomb, the soviets also wanted to gain the power of the bombs and began creating their own atomic bombs. Both the United States and the Soviet Union were testing their own set of weapons of mass destruction, beginning the atomic age of the cold war. The United States wanted to be on top of the soviets, so in response to the creation of the soviet’s own atomic bomb, americans created the hydrogen bomb, which was way more powerful the the original atomic bomb. The soviets followed and also created their own hydrogen bomb soon after the creation of the hydrogen bomb made by the americans.

Read More
1345 Words | 6 Pages

If a nuclear war happened, the chemical fallout would not only harm people that were not affected by the bombing. Not only is the blast deadly also, the after math is just as bad “The five-year death total may have even exceeded 200,000 as cancer and other long term effects took hand” (Manhattan project). The fallout would get into the air and water and contaminate everything, then people would be eating and drinking the chemicals. Also with it getting in the water it will stick to ships and boats and be transported to other countries that did not get hit by the nuke or by it getting transported by wind. Not only do people have to worry about a war, but where they store these missiles at and what would happen if one was to go off.

Read More
1294 Words | 6 Pages

Daisaku Ikeda said “Japan learned from the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki that the tragedy wrought by nuclear weapons must never be repeated and that humanity and nuclear weapons cannot exist.” The United States ended World War II by bombing Japan which caused radiation damage and devastation to all of Japan. The United States had three main reasons why they dropped the atomic bomb in such a rush. They wanted to limit American casualties from fighting future battles. The United States wanted to establish dominance over the war before Russia could join in.

Read More
872 Words | 4 Pages

Who has the right to decide who lives and who dies? It has always been a moral debate for centuries. In order to save oneself is it worth the lives of others? Is it better to be a martyr or a murderer. For every soldier saved from the atomic bombs in Japan, how many civilians were lost?

Read More
460 Words | 2 Pages

The development of the atomic bombs wasn’t the problem but the effect of it creating a nuclear race between nations, as we can see in the statistics in Document A. More than 100,000 people were killed in the impact over the years. Also stated in Document D “Unless an effective international control of nuclear explosives is instituted, a race of nuclear armaments is certain to ensue following the first revelation of our possession of nuclear weapons to the world.” This demonstrates the mortal potential of the bomb which killed a large number of people in just seconds, and how the recognition of the power of the weapon could be crucial if we do not take limiting measures worldwide.

Read More
852 Words | 4 Pages

In the twentieth century, the United States dropped two atomic bombs, which were the most powerful weapons at that time, on Japan. It happened on August 6 and August 9, 1945. The atomic bombs killed 226,000 Japanese and ended the war. However, America should not have dropped the atomic bombs for two reasons. First, it was not necessary to drop the bomb to win the war militarily or to get the Japanese to surrender.

Read More
1551 Words | 7 Pages

Yes, the Atomic bomb was tragic and had a lot of sorrow and loss but should be seen as something that prevented world havoc and caused even more destruction than what was already occurring. It also gives the countries that do have nuclear weapons a sense of security if a war were to break out since they can be used to defend their country or better yet end future wars all together. Also they have the highest form of national defense, nuclear weapons serve as a deterrence against all possible enemies. For more than 50

Read More
1838 Words | 8 Pages

Soon the U.S was attacked by Japan. The President then decided to drop the atomic bomb to end this war and quickly. The use of the atomic bomb on Japan was justified because it ended the war, was a better alternative than the others given, and helped save lives. The atomic bomb used on Japan was justified because it ended the war.

Read More
800 Words | 4 Pages

Just as mentioned before in Mary Shelley’s days, scientists believed that someday they would be able to reanimate corpses, so although Frankenstein’s ‘mad scientist’ studies, examinations and experiments seem to be intense, Shelley, even if just loosely, based them on some of the scientific debates and discoveries. Her main influencer being Charles Darwin’s grandfather Erasmus Darwin and Luigi Galvani. Back then, it was not uncommon to share scientific ideas in poem form, which is why Darwin published a poem called “The Temple of Nature”.

Read More
466 Words | 2 Pages

Nuclear bombs is a sort of technology that would hurt the human race if released into the world more than once. As well as our technology use to “help” us, but instead gets rid of our focus in life and makes us lazy to do anything to the world or try to succeed in helping the world. Technology humans created would soon be our desintegration. Once again as Omar Bradley once told the world, we shouldn’t be arrogant or incoherent to continue with technology without the proper safety regulations that needs to be sent across the universe. Without the proper security humanity will soon perish with the use of our own

Read More
862 Words | 4 Pages

Rough Draft Jacob Berry In 1941, is the year the Atomic bomb changed warfare and human life forever. Many projects around the United States worked on the race to create the atomic bomb. One project, The Manhattan Project, led by Julius Robert Oppenheimer, created enough U-235 to create one of these deadly weapons.

Read More
1172 Words | 5 Pages

If nuclear weapons were ever used again it could wipe out all of humanity. The United States created the first nuclear weapon in 1945, and with those nuclear weapons they bombed two Japanese cities called Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Nuclear Weapons should be banned, Countries should not have weapons that could wipe out the civilization. Nuclear weapons pose a direct threat to everyone. They cause distrust among nations and they are useless in addressing any of today 's real security threats.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of A Hydrogen Bomb

Related Topics

Open Document