ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of A Nationalistic Ideology

1384 Words6 Pages

The question consists of stating “We are a proud, strong people and it is our destiny to unite our people, then take our rightful place in history and subjugate those that oppose us.” The main issue of this statement is saying that people should be able to make her “rightful” place in history and punish/subjugate those who oppose their ideology and beliefs, regardless of the circumstances, to apparently “unite our people”. An Nationalistic ideology is what the author would support as it basically states that regardless of why people are opposing their views, they shall be subjugated. It is in support of nationalists/ultra nationalist because people may do whatever they need to do to support their national interest, which supposedly would benefit …show more content…

Others may believe that those who want to benefit one's own country should be able to whatever is necessary to benefit the greater good of their Nation, some Nationalists would also say that those decisions are to benefit their Nation only, and not others, is a good thing, Ultra nationalism would be considered benefiting one's country strictly, it could also mean not benefiting people in another minority. It is unfortunate but is the truth, that these actions did occur in our history, take Canada and the Native Indians, the British and Westerners came to Canada and took over their homeland, build out stores, polluted the air, and subjected them by opposing and trying to fight for what they …show more content…

Despite it being less cruel back them to tier standards, such actions in today's world would be impossible as the world has changed so much. Seeing the internment camps and the killing of 6 million Jewish people can be connected to how the quote is not good and how I disagree with it. Many human rights violations took place, catastrophic genocide and an attempt to exterminate a whole race. It was one of the world most deadly mass killings in history moreover will always be remembered of being that. November of 1938 was a time of pure hatred towards the Jewish population, as it was for all the years during this time, the Jewish people were fined for the destruction they had apparently caused both economically and politically, and Jewish shops and stores were destroyed by the Nazis. On July 14th, 1933, the Nazi Government banned all political parties except for the Nazis, creating a silent vibe for the opposing parties, and that a great, and bloody threat was imminent It was the drive to benefit one's nation only, Ultra nationalism nevertheless embracing true self identity towards one nation only. This correlates and connects with the how I do not support the quote, as it can be seen what truly can happen when people who oppose certain things are subjugated to great degrees, causing suffering and inhumane deaths on a large scale. On the 23rd of March, 1933, Adolf Hitler created the Enabling Act, meaning

Open Document