Posse Comotatus Act: 18 U.S. Code, Section 1385, an original intent of which was to end the use of federal troops to police state elections in former Confederate states, proscribes the role of the Army and Air Force in executing civil laws and states The PCA is concerned with preserving state authority (McGrane, 2010, p. 1311). According to Sean McGrane (2010), members of the U.S. military can not enforcing domestic laws if they are activated under the PCA (p. 1310). Meaning military member are not allowed to enforce any law enforcement duties once activated under PCA.
The Pendleton Civil Service Act was passed due to public disdain for the old spoils system. The spoils system had become too indoctrinated in the government and led to the assassination of President Garfield. Approved on January 16, 1883, the Pendleton Act established a merit-based system of selecting government officials and supervising their work. Following the assassination of President James A. Garfield by a disgruntled job seeker, Congress passed the Pendleton Act in January of 1883. The Civil Service Reform Act (called "the Pendleton Act") is an 1883 federal law that created the United States Civil Service Commission.
While researching this topic I have found multiple pros and cons of the three strikes law. Some of the pros that were mentioned include: repeat offenders will stay in prison; can deter offenders who have had two felony convictions from committing another crime; and it only applies to convictions. The first pro of the Three Strikes law is that repeat offenders will stay in prison for at least 25 years after their third conviction. If criminals choose to continue to break the law then will have to pay for their crimes. These criminals will not have a fourth chance to break the law.
The HITECH Act is a big portion of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act that promotes the widespread adoption of electronic health records/health information technology. It was passed because of the aforementioned and it provided benefits to patients/providers alike. The ARRA itself (which, of course includes the HITECH Act) was in response to the economic crisis of 2007-2009. The HITECH Act was ultimately designed to improve safety, quality, and efficiency. By responding to the Act's incentives, healthcare organizations can have patients discharged quicker because having information through technology is quicker and easier to maintain than paper-based, there would be improved clinical outcomes, as patient quality would improve, and medical
This act increased the federal powers imposed on the citizens in order to help their efforts towards investigating terrorists. These powers included telephone taps, internet taps, voice mail, grand jury information, immigration, money laundering, and crime. While these powers made it easier for the government to track down possible suspects of terrorism, it interfered with the people’s right to privacy. All the provisions under the Patriot Act can be used on the citizens with the approval of a court order. Furthermore, it interfered with the Fourth Amendment.
Introduction Signed into law on 26 October 2001, the US Patriot Act was meant to strengthen security controls and provide Americans with an opportunity to act in the defense of their freedom. Caused by the September 11 terrorist attacks, this rule was intended to help Americans protect themselves from future similar strikes. However, since its enactment 16 years ago, this legislation has provided a veil with which impunity and civil rights violators can hide behind as they perpetrate crime in the name of national security. The act augmented safety and intelligence agencies' powers to acquire confidential information.
Introduction The Wagner Act established by the federal government in 1935 as a control, as well as the final arbitrator of labor relations in the United States. Robert Wagner, a Democrat Senator of New York sponsored this Act. After is enactment , it established the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), with the power to defend the rights of most workers. In connection with the act, workers were in a position of organizing their own unions in that having the power of collective bargaining.
The United States of America made a Patriot Act which it was signed by President George W. Bush with the Act of Congress on October 26, 2001. It was titled a ten-letter backronym that stands for “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001”. In the essay will bring up defending or advocating the merits of the Patriot Act. Secondly, will talk about does the Patriot Act falls within the purview of the U.S. Constitution. Lastly, will talk about the suggest methods with the perceived racial/religious bias.
The Patriot act when passed it was overlooked, rushed and it did hinder our rights and privacy, however at that time who was thinking about their right and privacy when such an act had just happened. I was in high school when the Patriot Act went into law and all I cared was to make sure that the people that planned the attack get what they deserved for killing so many Americans. Maybe, they waited for the time that the American people were vulnerable to pass the Patriot Act, because they knew it wasn’t going to get everyone’s attention. Now, that a lot of people know how the Patriot Act works and how it has been used, we the American people want it gone or to have a better supervision so that individuals with malicious intent wont misuse it
Seventeen years ago, the United States and her people weren’t officially in any war or conflicts. Very few citizens had even heard of Al-Qaeda or Osama Bin Laden, and ISIL was not even a blip on her radar. America’s involvement in middle eastern affairs and the War on Terror – a reaction to the 9/11 terror attacks – created a drastic change in our nation’s political and social landscape. The aftermath of the attacks forced America to reevaluate their ideas regarding, safety and privacy. After the attacks of September 11th, the laws and regulations that have since passed have drastically improved national security, although the reduction in privacy, effects on foreign relations, and the lasting consequences of the War on Terror have had negative
The Castle Doctrine should not have any special circumstances that restrict the home owner from using self-defense. In Springfield, Oregon, a mechanic went into a small restaurant, walked up behind a man eating, and shot him in the back of the head. The mechanic believed the man had threatened his daughter. The mechanic was not persecuted; he was protected by the Castle Doctrine. Some state’s
Do you have a phone? Chances are you do. Would you be surprised if I said that people can view close to anything on your phone, computer, or any electronic device, without you knowing? The NSA (National Security Agency) listens to phone calls, looks at texts, and checks emails from over 300 million people, without them knowing. And the worst part: it is perfectly legal.
Does the castle law do more harm than good? Yes, there is no doubt that although we already have the self-defense law which involves crime and causes harm, the states that have adopted the castle law the numbers of murder and homicide have increased. Does having the castle law better crime or escalate violence? The increase in crime has been very traumatic since the castle law has been adopted by several states. Many would say that “his or her home is their castle”, and would do anything to protect it and their belongings.
In today’s society, tort reform remains an exceedingly controversial topic. There are some individuals who argue that tort reform bills should be stricter, while others argue that tort reform bills should be ruled in favor of citizens. Although the debate continues on in society, Congress has full authority in deciding which bills it wants to pass. Recently in an effort to make changes in our civil justice system, Republicans in the House of Representatives have introduced four bills: The Innocent Party Protection Act (HR 725), The Fairness in Class Action in Litigation Act (HR 985), Lawsuit Abuse Reduction Act (HR 720), and Protecting Access to Care Act (HR 1215). Each of the reform bills introduced has received both support and opposition
Introduction Dear Alexis, For you to have legal rights against Donald there must be required elements to be met, in your situation the law that we will be discussing is Intentional Torts. This covers Battery, Assault and False Imprisonment. I have found the following issues in the statement you have provided; 1) Moving the plants into your bedroom 2) The throwing of the glass causing minor cuts 3)
